Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
The $699 Ryzen 9 9950X3D sets a new bar for the company’s potent lineup of gaming-optimized X3D processors, sharing the top spot with the Ryzen 9 9800X3D as the fastest gaming CPUs in the world. AMD’s continued evolution of its ground-breaking 3D V-Cache tech has dramatically reduced the tradeoffs of lower productivity performance that used to be associated with its X3D chips, leaving little reason not to buy the chip if you prize both leading-edge gaming performance and real grunt power in productivity workloads.
Intel doesn't have a chip that can deliver a comparable blend of performance in both gaming and productivity. For gamers interested in Intel chips, the 14th-Gen processors remain the fastest for gaming, but they can’t compete with AMD’s X3D processors, and their aging design isn’t as powerful in productivity workloads as Intel’s newer Arrow Lake Core Ultra 9 285K.
Unfortunately for the Core Ultra 9 285K, while it maintains a lead over the 9950X3D in single-threaded work, it doesn’t establish itself firmly enough in multi-threaded applications to give it a complete win over Ryzen 9 in productivity work, and it is obviously a painfully inadequate competitor in gaming. That leaves Intel without a meaningful competitor for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D.
Below, we have the geometric mean of our gaming test suite at 1080p and a cumulative measure of performance in single- and multi-threaded applications. We conducted our gaming tests with an Nvidia RTX 5090, so performance deltas will shrink with lesser cards and higher resolution and fidelity settings.




It’s a dead heat in 1080p gaming at the top of the chart, with the Ryzen 9 9950X3D matching the 9800X3D. More impressively, the 9950X3D dispatches Intel’s chips easily, beating the 285K by 37% and the Core i9-14900K by 26%. Gaming is simply a no-contest.
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is impressive in productivity work, too, matching the standard Ryzen 9 9950X in our overall measure of both single- and multi-threaded workloads, an impressive accomplishment. It’s also 11% faster than the 285K in threaded workloads, though Intel fires back by taking a 7% lead in single-threaded work.
It isn’t often that a generational increase in TDP and power consumption is considered a good thing, but that’s exactly what we get with the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. The previous-gen 7950X3D had to step back 50W behind its standard counterpart due to its top-mounted L3 cache chiplet, but AMD's decision to move the chiplet to the bottom has drastically improved its ability to dissipate heat effectively. While we saw strong gains from this new technique with the single-chiplet 9800X3D, it is perhaps most important with the dual-CCD models. In the case of the 9950X3D, the extra 50W of headroom unleashes more horsepower for gaming and productivity work, making it the most powerful all-arounder that money can buy.
AMD will also release the 9900X3D tomorrow, but this chip doesn't look as promising. AMD's previous-gen 7900X3D suffered from a sizeable performance gap with its more powerful counterpart, scuttling the value proposition. The company says it has reduced that disparity this time around; however, the price delta is still slim between the two chips, especially given what will be substantial differences between the chips in productivity workloads. Don't pull the trigger on that chip until you see third-party testing.
Meanwhile, Arrow Lake remains a disappointment for us, and pretty much everyone else, too. Despite a string of BIOS, driver, Management Engine, and Windows updates, the Arrow Lake processors remain underwhelming on the multiple platforms we've tested.
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores another walk-in touchdown for AMD, easily earning its $699 price tag. Given the intense demand for the Ryzen 9 9800X3D and the resulting rolling shortages, we expect it might be hard to get your hands on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D at first, especially at MSRP. For those on the hunt for the highest-end performance money can buy, it will be worth the effort. If you can afford it, you won't find a mainstream desktop PC chip that offers a stronger blend of gaming and productivity performance.
Current page: Intel simply can't compete.
Prev Page AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Power Consumption, Efficiency, Test Setup
Paul Alcorn is the Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.
-
salgado18 Cons: pricing
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores another walk-in touchdown for AMD, easily earning its $699 price tag.
Come on, give it a 5 already! There are no cons, it's not a $1000 CPU, it has the perfect price for the performance and features. There won't be another 5 star-worthy processor for a long time.
(not being a fanboy, I'm just challenging the 5-stars-but-not-quite rating system)
https://i.imgflip.com/9mzje0.jpg -
Gururu I hate to ask the question, but will these wins be evident on 5070 ti cards and below? I just don't see the majority of people who go for this chip also forking for a 5090.Reply -
Crazyy8 I don't think I'll have to upgrade from my 7800X3D for a while, and I believe others with similar chips will concur. The 9950X3D is compelling, but not enough. I got my chip for $266(from a bundle), 80% of the performance of a 9950X3D for ~30% of the price was a damn good deal. If I ever do upgrade, it'll be far in the future when I can also afford faster RAM and a new Mobo, perhaps even a new GPU, but that's just me dreaming :smile:Reply -
TerryLaze
intel made 96.8bil in the last 10 years....oofdragon said:RIP Intel 10th consecutive year
that's net income after all expenses including dividends and after all the losses they had.
intel is RIP-ing all the way to bank, laughing.
During the same last ten years amd made 8.5 bil.
10 years ago AMD was still on faildozer................................................................................................................................................ -
Crazyy8
It's going to affect them long term. They are losing space in the gaming market as they haven't released anything competitive as of recent, and they are losing space in the server market as AMD's Threadripper and Epyc lines exist. Intel is subsiding on locked-in server owners who are already on intel's platform, along with the sale of older(relative)CPUs in the gaming market. At least, that's what I think is happening. For all we know, Intel could just be cooking up the hardest comeback ever with all that money! I don't care who has the best, competition lowers prices and that's what we all need.TerryLaze said:intel made 96.8bil in the last 10 years....
that's net income after all expenses including dividends and after all the losses they had.
intel is RIP-ing all the way to bank, laughing.
During the same last ten years amd made 8.5 bil.
10 years ago AMD was still on faildozer................................................................................................................................................ -
Gururu The one review that includes Wukong actually shows it losing to 285K, 7800X3D and 9950X. Very strange, how come noone is running Wukong benchmark?Reply -
salgado18
I honestly belive that, if Intel were cooking a comeback, they would be doing it since first-gen Zen. All they managed to do was to join two bad cores together, and disable hyperthreading. I'm not holding my breath for them, although the future might indeed bring surprises.Crazyy8 said:It's going to affect them long term. They are losing space in the gaming market as they haven't released anything competitive as of recent, and they are losing space in the server market as AMD's Threadripper and Epyc lines exist. Intel is subsiding on locked-in server owners who are already on intel's platform, along with the sale of older(relative)CPUs in the gaming market. At least, that's what I think is happening. For all we know, Intel could just be cooking up the hardest comeback ever with all that money! I don't care who has the best, competition lowers prices and that's what we all need. -
TerryLaze
You don't need to make a comeback if you are never gone in the first place...salgado18 said:I honestly belive that, if Intel were cooking a comeback, they would be doing it since first-gen Zen. All they managed to do was to join two bad cores together, and disable hyperthreading. I'm not holding my breath for them, although the future might indeed bring surprises.
Amd is still barely making any money,
and things are only going to get worse, they will have to pay for more advanced nodes and they will have to add more cores and maybe add x3d to more CPUs all of that is going to eat into amds earnings. -
jeremyj_83
In August I upgraded my old desktop from an i7-4770k to an R7 9700X. I kept the GPU during the upgrade, RX6700XT, and I have noticed higher FPS and consistently better lower FPS. Depending on what your current CPU is with something like the 5070Ti will matter quite a bit as to if you see huge gains or not.Gururu said:I hate to ask the question, but will these wins be evident on 5070 ti cards and below? I just don't see the majority of people who go for this chip also forking for a 5090.