AMD teases Ryzen 9000X3D chip coming November 7, cuts pricing on all other Ryzen 9000 chips
Jumping in front of Arrow.
AMD is jumping ahead of Intel's pending Arrow Lake launch by making a rather vague announcement that its next-gen Ryzen 9000X3D processor will launch on November 7. AMD also announced that it is trimming the recommended customer pricing (RCP) for its standard Ryzen 9000 series via a holiday promo starting yesterday, October 20. The promo cuts $50 off the price of its flagship Ryzen 9 9950X and $30 off the 9900X, Ryzen 7 9700X, and Ryzen 5 9600X.
The current-gen Ryzen 7000X3D processors are the unquestioned fastest gaming CPUs on the market. It doesn't look like Intel's Arrow Lake, which launches this week, will change that — in fact, Intel's new lineup appears to offer little in the way of gaming performance improvements, if any at all, over the company's prior-gen lineup. That leaves the door wide open for AMD to continue dominating the gaming market with its X3D chips.
AMD isn't divulging how many new Ryzen 9000X3D models are coming to market or what they will cost, but it does use the singular 'processor' in the announcement. Additionally, recent sightings of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which should take over the mantle of the best CPU for gaming from the existing Ryzen 7 7800X3D, point to its possible release soon.
We've also already seen the Ryzen 7 9800X3D listed for sale at several retailers for around $500 (early listings are typically inaccurate but do indicate pending launch). Combined with the fact that the existing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is now out of stock at every US retailer, there is little doubt that this model is on the cusp of release. AMD had three X3D models with the last generation of chips, and two pricier Ryzen 9 models with higher core counts were also available. Although it doesn't appear that the other two next-gen models will be in the first wave of the X3D launch, it is possible that they could also be listed in the coming days.
CPU | Street (MSRP) | Arch | Cores / Threads (P+E) | P-Core Base / Boost Clock (GHz) | E-Core Base / Boost Clock (GHz) | Cache (L2/L3) | TDP / PBP or MTP | Memory |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen 9 9950X | $599 ($599) | Zen 5 | 16 / 32 | 4.3 / 5.7 | — | 80MB (16+64) | 170W / 230W | DDR5-5600 |
Core Ultra 9 285K | $589 | Arrow Lake | 24 / 24 (8+16) | 3.7 / 5.7 | 3.2 / 4.6 | 76MB (40+36) | 125W / 250W | DDR5-6400 |
Ryzen 9 9900X | $429 ($469) | Zen 5 | 12 / 24 | 4.4 / 5.6 | — | 76MB (12+64) | 120W / 162W | DDR5-5600 |
Core Ultra 7 265K / KF | $394 / $379 (N/A) | Arrow Lake | 20 / 20 (8+12 | 3.9 / 5.5 | 3.3 / 4.6 | 66MB (36+30) | 125W / 250W | DDR5-6400 |
Ryzen 7 9700X | $326 ($329) | Zen 5 | 8 / 16 | 3.8 / 5.5 | — | 40MB (8+32) | 65W / 88W | DDR5-5600 |
Core Ultra 5 245K / KF | $309 / $294 (N/A) | Arrow Lake | 14 / 14 (6+8) | 4.2 / 5.2 | 3.6 / 4.6 | 50MB (26+24) | 125W / 250W | DDR5-6400 |
Ryzen 5 9600X | $279 ($249) | Zen 5 | 6 / 12 | 3.9 / 5.4 | — | 38MB (6+32) | 65W / 88W | DDR5-5600 |
Core i9-14900K / KF | ($445 K) / ($417 KF) | Raptor Lake Refresh | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.2 / 6.0 | <2.4 / 4.4 | 68MB (32+36) | 125W / 253W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
Core i7-14700K / KF | ($354 K) / ($327 KF) | Raptor Lake Refresh | 20 / 28 (8+12) | 3.4 / 5.6 | 2.5 / 4.3 | 61MB (28+33) | 125W / 253W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
Core i5-14600K / KF | ($256 K) / ($204 KF) | Raptor Lake Refresh | 14 / 20 (6+8) | 3.5 / 5.3 | 2.6 / 4.0 | 44MB (20+24) | 125W / 181W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | $599 ($699) | Zen 4 X3D | 16 / 32 | 4.2 / 5.7 | — | 144MB (16+128) | 120W / 162W | DDR5-5200 |
Ryzen 9 7900X3D | $599 ($599) | Zen 4 X3D | 12 / 24 | 4.4 / 5.6 | — | 140MB (12+128) | 120W / 162W | DDR5-5200 |
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | $449 ($449) | Zen 4 X3D | 8 / 16 | 4.2 / 5.0 | — | 104MB (8+96) | 120W / 162W | DDR5-5200 |
AMD's standard Ryzen 9000 series has had a tepid launch, largely due to small gen-on-gen gains in gaming performance that often make the heavily discounted prior-generation Ryzen 7000 series the better value.
To help rectify that in the face of Intel's pending Arrow Lake launch, AMD has announced that it reduced its recommended customer pricing (RCP) by $50 for its flagship Ryzen 9 9950X, and $30 for the Ryzen 9 9900X, Ryzen 7 9700X, and Ryzen 5 9600X.
However, AMD's recommended pricing often has little to no correlation to retail pricing. For instance, the Ryzen 9 9900X has been available for $439 for over a month, but now AMD has adjusted its pricing to $469, which is $30 higher than street pricing. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 7 7700X are already selling at the reduced pricing level, but perhaps that will come down further. Or perhaps the market may have already adjusted pricing on some of these models.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
The Ryzen 5 7600X sees the biggest win. This chip currently retails for $279, right at the RCP, but the new RCP lands at $249.
We'll see how pricing pans out in the market over the coming days to see if all of AMD's Ryzen 9000 will see further discounts. In the meantime, we're working on reviews of Intel's latest chips to see how they stack up. Stay tuned.
Paul Alcorn is the Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.
-
Heat_Fan89 I'd rather buy one of these than to buy a PS5 Pro. The only issue is the timing of the RTX 5 Series GPU's. As those are expected to drop early next year and could easily turn into the middle of next year. I'm looking to build this time instead of going the pre-built route. I seriously doubt HP, Lenovo or Alienware will offer the X3D series chips. Perhaps Corsair but that will probably turn into a $4,000+ machine.Reply -
DS426
If you're ready for a new gaming PC now, I wouldn't worry about RTX 5 series. If it was early 2025, sure, but just as you mentioned, it could actually end up being 6 months from today. Just grab a good holiday deal on a RX 7 series or RTX 4 series and call it a day.Heat_Fan89 said:I'd rather buy one of these than to buy a PS5 Pro. The only issue is the timing of the RTX 5 Series GPU's. As those are expected to drop early next year and could easily turn into the middle of next year. I'm looking to build this time instead of going the pre-built route. I seriously doubt HP, Lenovo or Alienware will offer the X3D series chips. Perhaps Corsair but that will probably turn into a $4,000+ machine. -
-Fran- Really looking forward how AMD will fumble this one.Reply
Because, come on. We all know AMD will do something to trip itself and screw this launch.
Regards. -
Heat_Fan89
Nah, I can wait for the RTX 5xxx series to appear.DS426 said:If you're ready for a new gaming PC now, I wouldn't worry about RTX 5 series. If it was early 2025, sure, but just as you mentioned, it could actually end up being 6 months from today. Just grab a good holiday deal on a RX 7 series or RTX 4 series and call it a day. -
rluker5 I would call it more an official announcement than a tease.Reply
with a release date and everything. -
redgarl
Games are so unoptimized and broken on PC that I would recommend just getting a PS5 Pro.Heat_Fan89 said:I'd rather buy one of these than to buy a PS5 Pro. The only issue is the timing of the RTX 5 Series GPU's. As those are expected to drop early next year and could easily turn into the middle of next year. I'm looking to build this time instead of going the pre-built route. I seriously doubt HP, Lenovo or Alienware will offer the X3D series chips. Perhaps Corsair but that will probably turn into a $4,000+ machine.
I played Jedi Survivor yesterday, and I got a bug preventing me from attacking enemies, healing or saving... my keyboard and my mouse lost half of their inputs.
And you take games like Alan Wake 2 and Wukong running barely at 1080p with Ray Tracing on a 4090...
And we are not talking about windows crippling performances like demonstrated lately.
This is the state of PC gaming, and you need to be a fool to think it is a better experience. -
redgarl
If Intel cannot match the 14900k gaming performances with Arrow Lake, which is already slower than the 7800x3D and even the 9700x, then there is no chance in hell that the 285k can beat the 9800x3D in gaming even with 0% performance increase over the 7800x3D.-Fran- said:Really looking forward how AMD will fumble this one.
Because, come on. We all know AMD will do something to trip itself and screw this launch.
Regards. -
Heat_Fan89
I already have a PS5. The minimal performance gains of the PS5 Pro are not worth the $800 asking price when I add a disc drive and vertical stand. I’ll wait for the PS6 instead.redgarl said:Games are so unoptimized and broken on PC that I would recommend just getting a PS5 Pro.
I played Jedi Survivor yesterday, and I got a bug preventing me from attacking enemies, healing or saving... my keyboard and my mouse lost half of their inputs.
And you take games like Alan Wake 2 and Wukong running barely at 1080p with Ray Tracing on a 4090...
And we are not talking about windows crippling performances like demonstrated lately.
This is the state of PC gaming, and you need to be a fool to think it is a better experience.
The games I have played have been rather good on my aging gaming rigs. It seems most of the egregious offenders have been Sony games ported to the PC. -
-Fran-
Both AMD and Intel have a problem with their respective launches: cheap-ish 7800X3Ds and 5700X3D/5800X3D.redgarl said:If Intel cannot match the 14900k gaming performances with Arrow Lake, which is already slower than the 7800x3D and even the 9700x, then there is no chance in hell that the 285k can beat the 9800x3D in gaming even with 0% performance increase over the 7800x3D.
AMD needs to think really hard on the price, otherwise it'll be another value clowns launch like Zen5 was.
3D is, first and foremost, a gaming CPU and value is king there. So I'd expect AMD will be able to read the room from all the Zen5 criticism. Unlikely given recent past history.
At least, I hope they now know how to test :D
Regards.