Core i5-14600 is only 5% slower than the Core i5-14600K in leaked benchmark — cheaper chip is only slightly slower but a lot more power-efficient

Intel Raptor Lake processors for desktops
(Image credit: Intel)

Benchmarks for Intel's upcoming Core i5-14600 (the non-K model) have leaked, detailing the CPU's boost clock speeds, multi- and single-threaded performance, and power consumption. X user @ECSM_Official shared screenshots of AIDA64, CInebench R23, and CPU-Z running on the Core i5-14600, and it seems like this lower-power chip is a 154-watt version of the Core i5-14600K, one of the best CPUs.

CPU clock speed and power data were measured during AIDA64's FPU stress test runt, which usually maxes out a CPU's power draw. Theoretically, this should confirm that the Core i5-14600 boosts to 4.8 GHz on its six P-cores and 3.9 GHz on its eight E-cores. A power consumption of 156 watts should also mean a TDP of 154 watts, which is what the Core i5-13600 is rated for.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0 P-Core Boost ClockE-Core Boost ClockTDP
Core i5-146004.8 GHz*3.9 GHz*154W
Core i5-136005.3 GHz3.7 GHz154W
Core i5-14600K5.3 GHz4.0 GHz181W

*Specifications are unconfirmed

These frequency results don't make complete sense as the Core i5-14600's P-cores boost 200 MHz lower than the Core i5-13600's when the Core i5-14600 should be faster or at least tied. What's most likely happening here is that the Core i5-14600 runs at a lower frequency than it drops to in sustained workloads. The screenshot shows that the AIDA64 FPU benchmark has been running for nearly three minutes, well past the window for the 14600 to be running at its maximum clock speed.

We saw similar behavior in our Core i5-13400F review. Though rated for a 4.6 GHz boost frequency, it could only hit that clock speed briefly before declining to 4.1 GHz. That's likely what's happening with the Core i5-14600 in this AIDA64 test, and although that E-core clock speed should be accurate, we ought to expect the Core i5-14600 non-K to hit at most 5.3 GHz on its P-cores, and only for a short time.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Cinebench R23 Performance
Header Cell - Column 0 Multi CoreSingle Core
Core i5-1460022,7681,992
Core i5-14600K25,2162,082

Given that the Core i5-14600 is running lower core frequencies, a moderately lower score in Cinebench R23 is unsurprising. In the multi-threaded test, the Core i5-14600 was only about 90% as fast as the Core i5-14600K, but in the single-threaded test, this increased to 95% of the speed of the Core i5-14600K. Shaving off about 30 watts in power consumption would clarify this result when Intel launches the Core i5-14600 and other non-K 14th Gen SKUs. Still, it would make it possible to launch them at CES, given it's just around the corner. Retail samples of the Core i5-14600 are soon at hand.

Matthew Connatser

Matthew Connatser is a freelancing writer for Tom's Hardware US. He writes articles about CPUs, GPUs, SSDs, and computers in general.

  • punkncat
    I honestly find this a bit surprising. There have been many generations of Intel CPU where the i5 K skew was the budget king of performance in the line. For them to release a xx400 skew that close in performance is hamstringing themselves. Poor marketing strategy on that. Will be interesting to see where prices land after this becomes more widely realized.
    Reply
  • ThomasKinsley
    I once bought an unlocked Intel chip and told myself that I would overclock when the PC got sluggish. By that time multiple components bottlenecked the boost, so I never bothered. Lesson learned.
    Reply
  • punkncat
    ThomasKinsley said:
    I once bought an unlocked Intel chip and told myself that I would overclock when the PC got sluggish. By that time multiple components bottlenecked the boost, so I never bothered. Lesson learned.

    Admittedly, I think the days of great gains overclocking are gone, outside of exotic cooling and 'just for the benchmark' type stuff these reviewers do.

    With that said, I have gone both ways on this. The K skew, even when on a board that can't OC is still slightly faster on its stock clocks. I have found that useful a time or two.
    Reply
  • Bubba Jones
    Huh? The 13600 does not exist! (at least not in retail channels...) Everything below a 13600k was warmed-over Alder Lake, without the vastly enlarged L2 cache.

    Yes, it "exists" on Intel datasheets, but that does not mean they ever actually sold them in relevant quantities or in consumer channels!

    See: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/230574/intel-core-i513600-processor-24m-cache-up-to-5-00-ghz/specifications.html
    The 14600 might exist in retail, but it would eat-in to the 14600k sales and offer very similar performance. Seems Intel is now separating retail CPU sales from channel sales and is being more careful about tier segregation in retail.
    Reply
  • richardvday
    Your title is wrong.
    Core i5-14600 is only 5% slower than the Core i5-14600K
    Reply
  • ilukey77
    well if they do a 14600 and the price is right i may buy that over the 13600k or 13600kf for my all intel build !!

    Personally the 14th is a joke and a waste of money but current AU prices puts the 14600k cheaper than the 13600k and the 13600kf cheaper again by $40aud if the 14600 comes in under the 13600kf ill buy it for my system !!
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    ilukey77 said:
    Personally the 14th is a joke
    https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-7600-non-x/22.htmlhttps://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i5-14600k/22.html
    With people crying all the time that intel is using too much power it's really weird that everybody keeps saying that intel making steps towards less power and better clocks at the same time is a waste or a joke...
    Just don't use a mobo that pumps all of the cores with way more power than allowed and don't use the e-cores for things they weren't meant for.

    12600k 23W @ ? 4.9Ghz ? (they don't have an analysis on techpowerup) single core
    13600k 21W @5.1Ghz single core
    14600k 18W @ 5.3Ghz single core

    Cinebench single, gain from 12th gen to 14th gen is 20%
    12600k 89.2
    13600k 95.3
    14600k 109.5
    Reply
  • ilukey77
    TerryLaze said:
    https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-7600-non-x/22.htmlhttps://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i5-14600k/22.html
    With people crying all the time that intel is using too much power it's really weird that everybody keeps saying that intel making steps towards less power and better clocks at the same time is a waste or a joke...
    Just don't use a mobo that pumps all of the cores with way more power than allowed and don't use the e-cores for things they weren't meant for.

    12600k 23W @ ? 4.9Ghz ? (they don't have an analysis on techpowerup) single core
    13600k 21W @5.1Ghz single core
    14600k 18W @ 5.3Ghz single core

    Cinebench single, gain from 12th gen to 14th gen is 20%
    12600k 89.2
    13600k 95.3
    14600k 109.5
    dude show me all the Graphs you want the 14th is a joke for little to no uplift over the 13th on a dead platform what would you call it ??

    20% uplift where are you getting them numbers on Liquid nitrogen OCed 14600k vs a stock 13600k !!
    at best it 5% if that

    seriously at this point you must work for Intel because anybody else with half a brain wouldnt defend them so much!!
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    With my Computer... Can idle about 38w on the wall.
    Gaming the cpu goes to about 70w at wall (13500t gpu wii u emulator)
    Gaming with the 6700XT 250w - 300w max
    With frame locked undervolt and other hacker things gaming 160w at the wall

    Only draw back only four ghz some cpu intensive games can smash the cpu

    The good I don't cook with the hardware.
    Reply