Star Citizen gets DLSS and Vulkan support, as new Nvidia driver adds support for F1 24, Hellblade 2, and more

F1 24
(Image credit: EA)
20

Nvidia announced a new game-ready driver that adds support for several new games and eleven new G-Sync compatible monitors. The 555.85 drivers add support for EA Sports' F1 24, Senua's Saga: Hellblade II, Serum, and Ubisoft's XDefiant free-to-play shooter. Nvidia also announced new game integrations with DLSS, one of which includes Star Citizen, which now boasts DLSS 2 upscaling and Vulkan support in the latest Alpha 3.23 update.

That's a big jump in driver versions, incidentally. Nvidia does this on occasion, often signifying a more significant overhaul of some of the underlying software. The previous driver release was 552.44, which came out May 9, an update to the 552.22 drivers from mid-April. We've been on 551/552 drivers from Nvidia since the start of 2024, but now the version jumped up to 555. Perhaps that's just the mid-year bump, though there are quite a few updates to discuss this round.

F1 24 is the latest iteration of EA Sport's Formula 1 game. The new title represents the most extensive update to the game since F1 2016. Not only are there new cars to drive, but the handling model has been reworked to provide a more realistic driving experience. Suspension has been updated to provide different driving behavior under various steering inputs. Tire degradation has been massively overhauled to behave more like real F1 cars, changing grip levels and wear characteristics depending on the environment and load on the tires. Aerodynamics has also been updated to incorporate fluid dynamics, leading to changing grip levels depending on how closely a driver is chasing another car in its "dirty air." F1 24 launches on May 28th, sporting Nvidia's DLSS 3 upscaling and frame generation technology, DLAA, Reflex, and ray tracing graphics.

Sensua's Saga: Hellblade 2 is the sequel to the award-winning Hellblade: Sensua's Sacrifice. Hellblade 2's story continues where Hellblade left off, showing her journey of survival in Iceland during the Viking era. The game leverages Epic's latest Unreal Engine 5, with impressive-looking visuals from top to bottom. Hellblade 2 launches today, featuring DLSS 3 upscaling, frame generation, and Nvidia Reflex technology.

Serum also utilizes Unreal Engine 5. It's a survival-horror game focused entirely on time. A timer on your arm decides if you live and die, and your goal is to fight through all obstacles in your way to find a special potion called Serum that will replenish your time. The game enters early access on May 23, with day-one support for DLSS 3 upcaling and frame generation, DLAA, and Reflex.

Last in the list of game ready options for this driver, Ubisoft's XDefiant is a brand new free-to-play competitive first-person shooter. The game takes inspiration from numerous outgoing shooter games, featuring fast-paced gunplay mixed with special character abilities. The game has teams of six with different factions to diversify the gameplay. XDefiant launches today featuring Nvidia Reflex technology to reduce latency.

Additional DLSS Game Integrations

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • gggplaya
    Star Citizen is also FREE TO PLAY until May 29th.
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    gggplaya said:
    Star Citizen is also FREE TO PLAY until May 29th.
    When's the release date?
    Reply
  • helper800
    peachpuff said:
    When's the release date?
    Yes!
    Reply
  • gggplaya
    peachpuff said:
    When's the release date?

    They have a few more years to go. But 4.0 Alpha release is scheduled for Q3 this year, so roughly 3-5 months from now which should give us Pyro(new star system) and Server Meshing version 1. The server load is really the thing holding this game back from ever being released. It makes the combat hard to enjoy due to desync. But once server meshing is complete, it should remove alot of the cpu and memory load off servers to have responsive gameplay. Right now, the whole star system is all loaded into a single server instance, which puts too much demand on a single server.

    Once, server meshing is complete with a 2.0 version with individual planets or areas are on a single server instance, meshed with multiple servers to make up a whole star system. Then I think we can finally talk about an actual beta and full release date. Personally I think, server meshing 1.0 in 2024, server meshing 2.0 by the end of 2026 along with base building. Vulkan multi-threading in 2025. Beta in 2027, so maybe a 2028 release.
    Reply
  • There is still no ETA on when Star Citizen will come out. I guess 2-3+ more years to go for the final version, IMO.

    Star Citizen, even with the new Vulkan renderer, is still a CPU-heavy title. So, DLSS and FSR may not bring major performance improvements. There is still no support for Frame Generation as well.
    Reply
  • helper800
    As someone with a background in game design, it drives me insane that companies use specific terms like 'Alpha,' and 'Beta' for video games that are clearly already 'out.' These terms have become so diluted by people who had no idea what they meant in reference to video games that the words have become meaningless.
    Reply
  • gggplaya
    Metal Messiah. said:
    There is still no ETA on when Star Citizen will come out. I guess 2-3+ more years to go for the final version, IMO.

    Star Citizen, even with the new Vulkan renderer, is still a CPU-heavy title. So, DLSS and FSR may not bring major performance improvements. There is still no support for Frame Generation as well.

    Vulkan is currently single threaded, so no real performance gains until they move to multi-threaded vulkan. They're just laying the groundwork to do that. Solving alot of crashing issues so far.
    Reply
  • gggplaya
    helper800 said:
    As someone with a background in game design, it drives me insane that companies use specific terms like 'Alpha,' and 'Beta' for video games that are clearly already 'out.' These terms have become so diluted by people who had no idea what they meant in reference to video games that the words have become meaningless.

    They allowed people to play it since it was literally just a hangar you could fly your ship around. Ever since then, they've been adding features to the game to make it a full game. Once they implement server meshing and base building. I think it'll be feature complete and can move onto beta for polish, then full release. After release they can add more gameplay loops and solar systems to keep the game going. It's come a long way in the past 10 years, but once server meshing helps solve the issue of running a full solar system on a single server instance, then I think you can finally see a light at the end of the tunnel.

    While traditionally alpha is kept in house for testing, CIG decided to make it externally tested. They make it very clear that the game is in alpha and you're a tester. You will get wiped numerous times and lose all progress. No one gets mad because this is known. Traditionally, alpha for me is software that can be tested, but is not feature complete. You test, validate new features as they make their way into the software and check for regression. Once all the major features of the software are complete, then you move onto beta and work on bug fixes and polish. Then you put out a release candidate for a wider audience and then full release. CIG is being non-traditional by letting everyone be testers, but I think that's awesome.

    While non-traditional I think this game does fall under alpha software level. Not all the major features needed for release are there yet, so it doesn't move onto beta.

    At what point in it's development would you consider this a game that is "out?"
    Reply
  • Eximo
    I think the problem is fatigue. All these micro releases over 8+ years instead of releasing some gaming experience and then releasing DLC/Expansions.
    Reply
  • helper800
    gggplaya said:
    At what point in it's development would you consider this a game that is "out?"
    So to start, the definition of a 'release' is when a game is accessible to play by the public or an internal review process. In game development 'alphas' and 'betas' fall under a game 'release.' An 'alpha' by definition has all major assets and features of the game, but is a bug ridden rat's nest that is used to hammer out all major game breaking bugs internally, or an internal 'release'. A 'beta' is a game that is completely feature complete with minor, non game-breaking, bugs. A 'beta' can be open to the public for testing network loading, and other cloud services. A 'full release' is directly after a 'beta' is finished ironing out all but the most minor bugs. Day one patches means a game was released before it was out of 'beta' and often even still in 'alpha'. Publishers and develops love to outsource bug reporting to people while simultaneously making them pay for the product before they even know whether the game will ever release.

    Star citizen would be considered a released product somewhere between the middle of alpha to the middle of beta. Some aspects of the game are in a beta state while others are in alpha. Considering you have to pay for it you could consider the product that is star citizen fully released whenever you could pay for it if you are being very strict.

    When a game is released with 10% of its planned features, 98% of its total life bugs, and 100% of its price tag you are effectively giving labor for the production and development of a game you don't know will ever be complete for free.
    Reply