Discrete GPU sales dip while Nvidia continues to dominate — iGPUs increase while discrete GPUs decline

AMD Radeon GPU
(Image credit: AMD)

According to Jon Peddie Research, third-quarter graphics processing unit shipments were up both year over year and quarter over quarter. However, sales of integrated GPUs were up both QoQ and YoY as the processor market was up, whereas supplies of discrete GPUs were down as AMD and Nvidia were preparing new offerings.

According to JPR, the market shipped 73.6 million iGPUs and dGPUs during the quarter. GPU shipments grew 3.4% compared to the previous quarter and 2.4% year-over-year. Notebook GPUs saw a significant 5.9% increase, while desktop graphics fell 5.6%. The industry also supplied 66.5 million PC CPUs (almost all feature integrated graphics), so shipments of processors rose 12% quarterly and 7.8% year-over-year. AMD outperformed its competitor Intel with a 15% increase in CPU shipments, while Intel experienced a 12% decline, something that Mercury Research reported last month.

On the graphics front, Intel dominated the market with a 65% share, followed by Nvidia with 18% and AMD with 17%. Yet AMD's GPU market share grew by 0.8% compared to the previous quarter, Intel's share increased by 1.1%, and Nvidia's share dropped by 1.9%.

When it comes to discrete GPUs, sales of standalone graphics processors for desktops and laptops totaled 7.1 million units, which is significantly lower than shipments in the third quarters of 2022 and 2023. That decline explains Nvidia's drop in market share.

PC makers and retailers typically buy discrete graphics cards and processors in the third quarter to prep for the holiday season. However, it does not seem that this was the case this year, perhaps because the lifecycles of AMD's Radeon RX 7000 and Nvidia's GeForce RTX 40-series are nearing their end, and people who would like to buy one of these graphics cards have probably done so by now. Furthermore, now that the next generation of AMD's Radeon RX 8000 and Nvidia GeForce RTX 50-series are nearing, it is unlikely that many people would like to get a current generation product.

"A surge led to the jump in overall GPU and CPU shipments in Q3," said Dr. Jon Peddie, president of Jon Peddie Research. "AMD and Intel released new CPUs, and there was some pent-up demand for them. However, looking forward, we think that if the proposed tariffs are imposed, the PC market will suffer a recession due to increased prices and unmatched increases in income."

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • User of Computers
    where are muh graphs?
    Reply
  • ekio
    Since Apple crushed the competition in single thread perf with its M4, and that you can easily make a 32 Arm core CPU, with tons of power, it makes sense that keeping CPU/GPU as dedicated chips feels more and more useless.

    If Nvidia or AMD was selling a SOC system with a premium gpu perf (4080/4090 level), with an included arm cpu system all-in-one, I would be glad to ditch my x86 cpu.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    ekio said:
    Since Apple crushed the competition in single thread perf with its M4, and that you can easily make a 32 Arm core CPU, with tons of power, it makes sense that keeping CPU/GPU as dedicated chips feels more and more useless.

    If Nvidia or AMD was selling a SOC system with a premium gpu perf (4080/4090 level), with an included arm cpu system all-in-one, I would be glad to ditch my x86 cpu.
    What does Apple having a good CPU core have to do with the modularity of computer components? Am I missing something?

    (AMD already has something like this with their MI300A, combining a powerful compute GPU and some general-purpose CPU cores)
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    ekio said:
    Since Apple crushed the competition in single thread perf with its M4, and that you can easily make a 32 Arm core CPU, with tons of power, it makes sense that keeping CPU/GPU as dedicated chips feels more and more useless.
    you mean apples $3000+ machine (that goes much higher when you add an actual acceptable amount of ram/storage) thats only aroudn a 4080 super tier of graphics?


    you can build a better system (and not be locked into a locked down ecosystem that wont let you do what you want but only what Apple says you can do) with a 4080 super and have an upgrade path going forward instead of a e-waste paperweight. (as nand has limited lifespan and WILL die and apple doesnt let you swap em out)

    also fact you can't truly compare x86 to arm (which apples are) & better off waiting few yrs until amd (and possibly intel) release arm designs.

    Also fact Nvidia might actually be getting into ARM cpu market.
    Reply
  • Heat_Fan89
    ekio said:
    Since Apple crushed the competition in single thread perf with its M4, and that you can easily make a 32 Arm core CPU, with tons of power, it makes sense that keeping CPU/GPU as dedicated chips feels more and more useless.

    If Nvidia or AMD was selling a SOC system with a premium gpu perf (4080/4090 level), with an included arm cpu system all-in-one, I would be glad to ditch my x86 cpu.
    Gotta love synthetic benchmarks. It's like trying to compare vehicles for average MPG. It means little in the real world. What I do know as a long time Mac user is that Apple computers still suck badly at playing games, especially AAA titles. I laugh when I read about Mac users wondering why their overly expensive Mac struggles to play certain games that an Intel or AMD box has no trouble with.

    People buy the best Nvidia and AMD GPU's primarily for the purpose of playing the latest AAA games at 4K 30-60FPS with all the graphical bells and whistles turned on. Nvidia and AMD GPU's are popular because they specialize primarily for graphics.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Is the article referring to the global market or US only?

    I can understand CPU sales being up. The R7 9800X3D is selling so well, I can't find stock of it anywhere in the world.
    Gaming dGPU sales are down because people are waiting for the RTX 50 and RX 8000 series, but they aren't arriving until 25'Q1, unlike what was expected with a 24'Q4 launch.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    It's a bad idea to combine iGPU and dGPU sales together
    Reply
  • usertests
    Giroro said:
    It's a bad idea to combine iGPU and dGPU sales together
    Yup, it's a nonsense number. Intel likes it though.
    Reply
  • prtskg
    Notton said:
    Is the article referring to the global market or US only?

    I can understand CPU sales being up. The R7 9800X3D is selling so well, I can't find stock of it anywhere in the world.
    Gaming dGPU sales are down because people are waiting for the RTX 50 and RX 8000 series, but they aren't arriving until 25'Q1, unlike what was expected with a 24'Q4 launch.
    This is for global market. Most of the sales are dominated by OEMs buying from manufacturers. Correlating these data with DIY market may result in wrong conclusion.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    prtskg said:
    This is for global market. Most of the sales are dominated by OEMs buying from manufacturers. Correlating these data with DIY market may result in wrong conclusion.
    ^^^ this. DIY numbers are around 1% of all PC components sold.
    Reply