Intel Battlemage GPU has surfaced in the wild — GPU spotted with 24 Xe2 cores, 19 Gbps memory, 12GB VRAM, 192-bit bus

Gunnir Arc A770 Photon 16G OC W
(Image credit: Gunnir)

More Battlemage specs have been leaked ahead of the discrete GPU architecture's purported launch later this year. Gaav87, on the AnandTech forums, discovered a Linux boot-up log containing a Battlemage GPU featuring 24 Xe2 cores and 12GB of video memory.

The log purportedly discloses a GPU bus width of 192 bits and 12GB of 19 Gbps memory, resulting in a bandwidth of 456 GB/s. In a follow-up post, Gaav87 shares more core specifications. The GPU has 24 Xe2 cores, 192 execution units, 15 TFLOPs of single precision performance, and a 1.8 GHz base clock. He also made some performance implications, suggesting the Battlemage GPU is 50% faster than the Arc A750 but slower than the RX 6800 or RTX 3070 Ti.

Assuming these specs are accurate, the new memory configuration reveals that Intel is switching things up on the memory side to a more mainstream configuration, indicative of modern mid-range GPUs. The previous Arc A750 and A770 used an unorthodox 256-bit wide interface with just 8GB of memory — 8GB and 16GB on the Arc A770. This config offered Intel's flagship and runner-up GPUs class-leading memory bandwidth. Still, both GPU's 8GB memory capacity held it firmly as a competitor only to other mid-range 8GB GPUs (only a few ARC A770 variants were equipped with 16GB).

The Battlemage GPU's 192-bit interface and 12GB of memory offer a more balanced approach. The new configuration provides less memory bandwidth than the Arc A750/A770. However, adding 4GB more video memory offsets the bandwidth reduction. This 192-bit 12GB memory configuration is prevalent among mid-range GPUs and is used in the RTX 4070 Super, RX 6750 XT, and RX 7700 XT, to name a few GPUs.

Based on current leaks surrounding Battlemage GPU core counts, 24 Xe2 cores suggest this new GPU is a mid-range offering in Intel's next-generation GPU lineup. Previous reports indicate that Intel will have GPUs with up to 32 Xe2 cores for Battlemage. 

Battlemage is Intel's next-generation graphics architecture, purported to debut before 2025. The architecture has undergone a massive overhaul, featuring next-generation "Xe2" graphics cores, more powerful AI processing capabilities, and better ray tracing compute power. In iGPU form, Battlemage is 1.5x faster than Meteor Lake Arc Alchemist integrated graphics.

Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    He also made some performance implications, suggesting the Battlemage GPU is 50% faster than the Arc A750 but slower than the RX 6800 or RTX 3070 Ti.

    That puts it about 4060 Ti levels of performance, which is roughly 10% slower than the 3070 Ti. Not bad for entry level if they can market it for $250.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    That puts it about 4060 Ti levels of performance, which is roughly 10% slower than the 3070 Ti. Not bad for entry level if they can market it for $250.
    No way that markets for $250. My guess is $399.00 just because its new mid-range silicon.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Gururu said:
    No way that markets for $250. My guess is $399.00 just because its new mid-range silicon.

    The 5060 won't cost that and it's going to be faster, so why would anyone pay $400 for a slower card from Intel?
    Reply
  • Mattzun
    The 7700xt is faster than this and frequently available for 380.
    It would need to be 20 percent below that to have a lot of sales (10% performance, 10% driver rep)

    Based on current competition, it would be compelling at 300$ and interesting at 350.

    I don’t see that changing with the next gen.
    The 5060 is supposed to be another 8gb card and not a real competitor.
    I’m not expecting an amazingly good 12gb 8600 out of AMD.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    The 5060 won't cost that
    have you not seen Jensen's take on the vlaue of a 60 tier card?
    it very well could be that much & the increased vram on intel would make it have more reason to buyunless they increase vram as games keep wanting more as time goes on.
    Reply
  • DerKeyser
    The sad part is that I’m guessing this will be the last GPU series from Intel. They ALWAYS buy up things or develop from scratch only to to do what they always do:

    If they are not 100% successfull and completely OWN the market for a new product in less than 3 - 5 years - like they used to do for x86, they cancel or sell of the productline completely.

    I’m guessing Battlemage will be their swansong for GPUs - especially now when their intire business is in the gutter.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Sorry but the 5060 will be a 4070 with same price tag...

    Cheap cards are done. You will have cheap 5050 with a price tag of 350usd
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    Cheap cards aren't done, it is just that a cheap card will be able to eke out 60fps on whatever the current popular titles are and that is about all they will do.
    Anything over that or 1440 cards aren't going to be cheap on release.
    That is on the consumer. No one is forcing people to overpay, they are getting in line willingly.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    The 5060 won't cost that and it's going to be faster, so why would anyone pay $400 for a slower card from Intel?
    A 5060 might not even exist. Why would Nvidia even bother? They're an AI company now, not gaming.
    Why would Nvidia waste silicon on a $200-$300 RTX 5060 when they could slap some extra memory on the board and sell that same chip as an entry level AI card for $1000+?
    Reply
  • Mattzun
    Cheap cards are on life support - the low end is migrating to integrated graphics.

    The new Zen 5 mobile chips show that low end laptop GPUs aren't really needed.
    Consoles and handhelds have shown that AMD can release APUs that cover the low end.
    I assume that Intel will be leveraging its Arc lessons and drivers to radically improve its integrated graphics.

    I suspect that the real hope for Arc to to continue past battlemage is that a lot of the work is also needed for better integrated graphics and/or AI cards.
    Reply