PowerColor Radeon RX 8000 'Reaper' series rumored to debut at CES 2025 next month

AMD
(Image credit: AMD)

PowerColor is rumored to be working on a new series of GPUs codenamed "Reaper" for AMD's upcoming Radeon RX 8000 GPUs leveraging the RDNA 4 architecture, per Videocardz. The Reaper series likely targets the budget/mainstream segment and should slot in with PowerColor's current offerings rather than replace any existing lineup.

PowerColor is one of AMD's longest and most loyal AIB partners, with over a decade of experience as a licensed producer of Radeon cards. The brand employs several GPU series to diversify its offerings: Liquid Devil, Red Devil, Hellhound, Red Dragon, and Fighter, ranked from most premium to budget-oriented. PowerColor decided not to release any Red Dragon models for the Radeon RX 7000 series. - but that lineup is expected to return with AMD's next-gen Radeon RX 8000 GPUs in January.

Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • -Fran-
    "Reaper" series? Are they making GN-based cards now? LOL

    Oh, man...

    Anyway; I just hope AMD doesn't screw up this launch. They've set expectations on "mid tier" compelling performance for the price, so they better deliver.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • munkee_zero
    I would hope both the 8600 and 8800 are outfitted with over 8Gb VRAM. I think Intel have cottoned on that with their Battlemage GPUs.
    Reply
  • Notton
    8GB on an 8600?
    Jeepers Creepers, they're gonna get bleepered.
    Reply
  • Mama Changa
    Notton said:
    8GB on an 8600?
    Jeepers Creepers, they're gonna get bleepered.
    Especially since it will also be old GDDR6 memory. Still 5060 is 8GB only too. But I don't know if this level of card gets GDDR7. It'll probably rely on L2 cache but that only get so you so far and won't help if you run out of memory.


    I consider 7600 and 7600XT as trash tier and misnamed 7500 parts like 4060 is misnamed 4050 and looks like 8600 will continue that trend.
    Reply
  • Hotrod2go
    8600 with 8GB memory translates into AMD have done their market research & are confident a return on investment will be adhered to like all good business practice in the first place. The complaints on here for 8GB limitation are from end users who think consumers of these cards only play PC games & ultra settings & that's all they ever do with their card. AMD certainly doesn't see it this way unless you think their marketing dept & researches don't know their backside from their brains.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Hotrod2go said:
    8600 with 8GB memory translates into AMD have done their market research & are confident a return on investment will be adhered to like all good business practice in the first place. The complaints on here for 8GB limitation are from end users who think consumers of these cards only play PC games & ultra settings & that's all they ever do with their card. AMD certainly doesn't see it this way unless you think their marketing dept & researches don't know their backside from their brains.
    Did you totally miss the B580 review?
    It is $250 and trades blows with the 7600XTThe 7600XT is $315.

    Where as the 7600 is also $250, but gets left in the dust, and is well known to run out of VRAM, even at 1080p.
    Reply
  • Hotrod2go
    Notton said:
    Did you totally miss the B580 review?
    It is $250 and trades blows with the 7600XTThe 7600XT is $315.

    Where as the 7600 is also $250, but gets left in the dust, and is well known to run out of VRAM, even at 1080p.
    It's not $250 where I could obtain the B580 from my part of the world. It's nearly double that in my country, so the age old argument of relativity comes into play. Value for money is what most PC enthusiasts consider before purchases in line with their user case. Lots of nuances in that argument,,, but go for it, I'm all ears...
    Reply