RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 specs reportedly leaked — up to 4,096 SPs, 16GB VRAM, and 2.9 GHz boost
The only thing that's missing is the pricing.

Thanks to hardware enthusiast momomo_us at X, the beans have been spilled about AMD's upcoming RX 9070 series. The leaked information suggests that the RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 will seemingly carry 16GB of GDDR6 memory and offer a slight uptick in the SPs (Stream Processors) count compared to their RDNA 3 counterparts. As always, sprinkle salt over this leak, even though the leaker has a solid track record.
As a brief reminder, AMD introduced RDNA 4 at CES but was tight-lipped regarding specifications and performance. AMD has promised more details later this quarter despite numerous leaks suggesting a reveal this month. We grabbed a few snippets of Navi 48, the die at the heart of AMD's RX 9070 series, coming in at almost 390mm2. Many performance leaks allege the RX 9070 XT matches the RTX 4080 Super in raster and the RTX 4070 Ti Super in ray-tracing performance, but you should approach these claims skeptically.
The tipster claims that AMD's RX 9070 series will debut with PCIe 5.0 support similar to Nvidia's Blackwell series. The flagship RX 9070 XT is rumored to offer 16GB of 20 Gbps memory across a 256-bit interface and 4,096 SPs. Assuming AMD doesn't alter the core layout with RDNA, 4 equals 64 CUs (Compute Units). Due to the slower GDDR6 memory, the RX 9070 XT's bandwidth is 640 GB/s, shy of the RX 7900-series. The RX 9070 XT is allegedly specified to reach 2.97 GHz (boost), so AIB models should have no problems breaching the 3 GHz barrier.
GPU | Architecture | Stream Processors | Compute Units | VRAM | Memory Speed | Memory Bus Width | Memory Type | Bandwidth | Base / Boost Clocks | PCIe Support |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RX 9070 XT* | RDNA 4 | 4,096 | 64 | 16GB | 20 Gbps | 256-bit | GDDR6 | 640 GB/s | 2.40 GHz / 2.97 GHz | PCIe 5.0 |
RX 9070* | RDNA 4 | 3,584 | 56 | 16GB | 20 Gbps | 256-bit | GDDR6 | 640 GB/s | 2.07 GHz / 2.52 GHz | PCIe 5.0 |
RX 7900 XTX | RDNA 3 | 6,144 | 96 | 24GB | 20 Gbps | 384-bit | GDDR6 | 960 GB/s | 1.92 GHz / 2.49 GHz | PCIe 4.0 |
RX 7900 XT | RDNA 3 | 5,376 | 84 | 20GB | 20 Gbps | 320-bit | GDDR6 | 800 GB/s | 1.38 GHz / 2.39 GHz | PCIe 4.0 |
RX 7900 GRE | RDNA 3 | 5,120 | 80 | 16GB | 18 Gbps | 256-bit | GDDR6 | 576 GB/s | 1.28 GHz / 2.24 GHz | PCIe 4.0 |
RX 7800 XT | RDNA 3 | 3,840 | 60 | 16GB | 19.5 Gbps | 256-bit | GDDR6 | 624 GB/s | 1.29 GHz / 2.43 GHz | PCIe 4.0 |
RX 7700 XT | RDNA 3 | 3,456 | 54 | 12GB | 18 Gbps | 192-bit | GDDR6 | 432 GB/s | 1.43 GHz / 2.54 GHz | PCIe 4.0 |
*Specifications are unconfirmed.
The RX 9070 non-XT, per this leak, retains a 16GB frame buffer and dials down the core count to 3,584 SPs or 56 CUs. With a memory configuration similar to its elder sibling, the RX 9070 can also dish out 640 GB/s of bandwidth. The base and boost clocks take a hit, now limited to 2.52 GHz (boost), almost 500 MHz short of the RX 9700 XT. This large drop should result in a lower TGP (Total Graphics Power), possibly below 200W, but that's a guess.
To tackle DLSS, AMD has developed FSR 4, exclusive to the RX 9000 series and powered by hardware-based machine learning. We won't know how this technology fares against Nvidia's newer stuff until these GPUs launch. AMD may be waiting to gauge how well Blackwell performs and price RDNA 4 accordingly. In any case, we will have to wait a bit longer for AMD's long-anticipated reveal.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
OllyR considering these numbers of SPs, CUs RAM and Watts the performances, if leaks benchmarks will be confirmed are amazing!(y)Reply
This is a what a real improvement gen after gen is. Not double the SPs and watt (and maybe price...) for illude the masses that you have improved something. Also the node it's the same so again if leaks will be confirmed this RDNA4 (in particular the XT version) will be the middle-high (more on the true high end for the XT...) king this year. That is what consumers already show they want to buy, see steam surveys.... -
-Fran-
Also, to add on your optimism: given the Stream count, manufacturing process and use of GDDR6 still, then these should be much cheaper to make than current gen RDNA3 top dies by a lot. This is to say, if AMD was able to discount the 7900GRE to about $600, then these may actually hit the $400 territory at some point, which would be fantastic. I hope I'm not too off the mark here.OllyR said:considering these numbers of SPs, CUs RAM and Watts the performances, if leaks benchmarks will be confirmed are amazing!(y)
This is a what a real improvement gen after gen is. Not double the SPs and watt (and maybe price...) for illude the masses that you have improved something. Also the node it's the same so again if leaks will be confirmed this RDNA4 (in particular the XT version) will be the middle-high (more on the true high end for the XT...) king this year. That is what consumers already show they want to buy, see steam surveys....
For comparison, the 7800XT is ~346mm2@N5 and this one will be ~390mm2@N4. And the 6700XT was ~335mm2@N7.
Regards. -
Amdlova Need to be really cheap. And they need to be better on RT than intel or amd will be in bad shape.Reply -
Notton
Nope. They're focusing their production on MI300 and there's no extra capacity to make yet another chip that works with GDDR7.Mama Changa said:Could they have not offered a 9080XT with 16GB GDDR7 as a flagship?
At least, that's the impression I get. -
usertests The non-XT pricing is going to be interesting. It looks pretty good, but AMD may price it too high to upsell to the other one.Reply
They can't switch from GDDR6 to GDDR7 without a completely different memory controller, possibly more. And if it's not clearly faster than the 7900 XTX, then it probably doesn't need more memory bandwidth.Mama Changa said:Could they have not offered a 9080XT with 16GB GDDR7 as a flagship?
It would be funny if we see a 32 GB model though. -
lmcnabney
AMD learned their lesson. The money-is-no-object consumers are always going to buy Nvidia. Even if AMD is competitive in that sector. They have decided not to waste resources chasing the top of the market and instead focus on taking market share in the second-best tier where the customers aren't as brand loyal and are much more likely to choose the best price/performance option.Mama Changa said:Could they have not offered a 9080XT with 16GB GDDR7 as a flagship? -
Hotrod2go Still no credible info on TBP of RX 9700 XT yet, so there's that to take into consideration.Reply -
YSCCC Considering all this... all I concern is the PRICE. It definitely looked nice just like how RDNA3 was, if they priced similarly bad (which I have confidence they will)... they won't sell, and vice versa if they are like $400-450, they will have a hard time keeping any stock on shelfReply -
usertests
IDK about credible but I heard it was 260-330 Watts depending on the model.Hotrod2go said:Still no credible info on TBP of RX 9700 XT yet, so there's that to take into consideration.
https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-radeon-rx-9070-xt-expected-to-boost-up-to-3-1-ghz-260-330w-tbp-depending-on-a-model
If we accept it as a competitor to the 5070 or 5070 Ti, those have 250W and 300W defaults respectively.