Intel's new CPU socket may not need custom contact frames to improve chip temperatures anymore — the LGA1851 socket allegedly features optional "Reduced Load ILM" to improve temps
It looks like you won't need to invest in an aftermarket contact frame to tame high CPU temperatures.
Hardware leaker Jaykihn on X (Twitter) claims that Intel's LGA1851 socket for Arrow Lake processors will support two independent loading mechanisms (ILMs): a default one similar to LGA1700 and a secondary model dubbed "Reduced Load ILM" or RL-ILM that is aimed at enthusiasts and overclockers looking for improved thermal performance.
The LGA1700 socket was one of Intel's most unfriendly sockets for overclockers and enthusiasts. The problem is the socket's notoriously bad ILM, which causes 12th Generation Alder Lake, 13th Generation Raptor Lake, and 14th Generation Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs to bend in the center when installed. That leads to poor contact with the CPU cooler, causing temperatures to increase by varying amounts.
This new RL-ILM will purportedly be an optional upgrade that Intel's board partners can utilize if they wish to do so. The more advanced ILM design is reported to cost only $1 more than the default ILM, which could sway many board partners into adopting the higher-performing ILM for mid-range, flagship, and overclocking-specific LGA1851 motherboards.
Specifications of the new RL-ILM design are unknown. However, the intended purpose of the RL-ILM is to prioritize cooling performance, so it will inevitably have a significantly altered design compared to the default LGA1851 or LGA1700 ILM. The biggest problem with the existing LGA1700 ILM is that it puts massive pressure on the central part of the CPU, which, over time, causes the CPU to bend ever so slightly in the middle. This bend does not affect the chip's structural integrity or default operation. Still, it affects the IHS's cooling performance regardless, impacting overclockers and enthusiasts pushing their CPUs to their limit.
To rectify this problem, Intel will inevitably adopt a less aggressive design that spreads the contact points of the ILM across more areas of the IHS, reducing the chance of the CPU bending while in the socket. This will cause the chip's IHS to remain more uniform when touching the contact plate on a CPU cooler, boosting cooling performance and efficiency.
If this claim is legitimate, this new RL-ILM will be an excellent update to the LGA1851 socket. Overclockers and enthusiasts running outgoing LGA1700 motherboards and CPUs are virtually forced to invest in aftermarket contact frames to improve thermal performance. In fact, some high-end cooling manufacturers have engineered custom contact frames customers can use to replace Intel's ILM, such as the Arctic Freezer III.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.
-
thestryker All Intel needed to do from the start is use an ILM with the design of the LGA2011/2066 one, but OEMs are cheap. I'm still surprised they didn't have one like that as an alternative, but perhaps that's what this one will end up being though the LGA2011/2066 has more mounting pressure than LGA1700.Reply -
Alvar "Miles" Udell Given how Intel, and AMD, CPU's boost speed is based on temperature, a lower temperature will only help "default operation" as well as manual overclockers. If it only costs board makers $1 to implement, it sounds to me like they're wanting to create more segmentation between "budget" and "premium" models.Reply -
thestryker
Honestly I think the whole thing has a lot more to do with OEM sales than board partners because I'm pretty sure board partners would be fine with the additional cost for retail boards. If you're Dell/HP/Lenovo the added cost becomes millions that they'd rather not spend as it hits their bottom line.Alvar Miles Udell said:Given how Intel, and AMD, CPU's boost speed is based on temperature, a lower temperature will only help "default operation" as well as manual overclockers. If it only costs board makers $1 to implement, it sounds to me like they're wanting to create more segmentation between "budget" and "premium" models.
I'm pretty sure if two ILMs are available though you're right with regards to it being an additional segmentation point. -
YSCCC Why on earth would they not make the improved ILM the default one instead of making it like an upgrade?! a $1 cost to not making your name stinks seems more than worthwhile to make it the defaultReply -
Kondamin
Because practically no one cares about it as the default is good enough and a dollar extra for millions of items sold is millions of dollarsYSCCC said:Why on earth would they not make the improved ILM the default one instead of making it like an upgrade?! a $1 cost to not making your name stinks seems more than worthwhile to make it the default -
TheHerald I've tried a 3rd party Ilm on 2 different boards with 3 different cpus. For the life of me couldn't really tell the difference. There was maybe a 3c difference when pushing 330 watts + on a 14900k but I can't be absolute sure about that either. It really doesn't make much of a difference, especially for normal use cases.Reply -
Marco_il_bello I know there's a lot to do, but I'm starting to see the "changes" of having had finance CEOs for years and now instead there is a CEO who is a technician, one of the industry to be clear, in my opinion he has the cards to compete against LisaReply