Micron and SK hynix unveil new LPDDR5X SOCAMM memory up to 128GB, debuts on Nvidia GB300 systems
2.5X higher bandwidth than RDIMMs at the same capacity

Micron, Samsung, and SK hynix have introduced their small outline compression attached memory modules (SOCAMM) that use LPDDR5X memory and are aimed at AI and low-power servers. SOCAMMs — which will first be used with servers based on Nvidia's GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Superchip systems — are designed to bring together high capacity, high performance, small footprint, and low power consumption.
A SOCAMM measures 14x90mm — one-third of a traditional RDIMM — and carries up to four 16-die LPDDR5X memory stacks. Micron's initial SOCAMM modules will offer a capacity of 128GB and will rely on the company's LPDDR5X memory devices produced on its 1β (1-beta, 5th Generation 10nm-class) DRAM process technology. Micron does not disclose data transfer rates supported by its initial SOCAMM sticks but says that their memory is rated for up to 9.6 GT/s. Meanwhile, SK hynix's SOCAMM demonstrated at GTC 2025 is rated for up to 7.5 GT/s.
Memory consumes a sizeable part of server power consumption. For example, the power consumption of DRAM in servers equipped with terabytes of DDR5 memory per socket exceeds that of CPUs. Nvidia designed its Grace CPUs around LPDDR5X memory, which consumes less than DDR5, but implemented a wide memory bus (taking a page from datacenter-grade processors from AMD and Intel) to offer high memory bandwidth. However, with GB200 Grace Blackwell-based machines, Nvidia had to use soldered-down LPDDR5X memory packages as no standard LPDDR5X memory modules would meet its capacity requirements.
Micron's SOCAMM changes this by offering a standard modular solution that can house four 16-die LPDDR5X memory stacks, potentially offering a rather whopping capacity. Micron says that its 128GB SOCAMMs consume one-third of the power consumed by a DDR5 RDIMM of a 128GB capacity, which is a big deal. Unfortunately, it is unclear whether Micron's SOCAMMs will ever be an industry standard supported by JEDEC or will remain a proprietary solution developed by Micron, Samsung, SK hynix, and Nvidia for servers running Grace and Vera CPUs.
Micron's SOCAMM sticks are already in mass production, so expect systems based on Nvidia's GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Superchip to use this memory. Modular memory simplifies server production and maintenance, which will positively affect the prices of these devices.
"AI is driving a paradigm shift in computing, and memory is at the heart of this evolution," said Raj Narasimhan, senior vice president and general manager of Micron's Compute and Networking Business Unit. "Micron's contributions to the Nvidia Grace Blackwell platform yields significant performance and power-saving benefits for AI training and inference applications. HBM and LPDDR memory solutions help unlock improved computational capabilities for GPUs."
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
das_stig Can SOCAMM come a standard depends if it becomes a free design, if not then no, as nobody will be willing to pay even a fraction of a cent per unit.Reply -
scogar can you add a photo of the back of the SOCAMM, it's not clear how this connects to the motherboard.Reply -
Elrabin
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/a-curious-use-case-for-camm2-memory-modules-on-desktops-liquid-coolingscogar said:can you add a photo of the back of the SOCAMM, it's not clear how this connects to the motherboard.
it's basically the same "pads" in a modern CPU
The "pins" are on the socket on the board -
thestryker Looks like the same exact concept as the LPCAMM design but they lengthened it in order to narrow them so they can be placed side by side more easily.Reply -
bit_user
FWIW, that's not a SOCAMM, but rather CAMM2. Though, the connectivity is probably very similar.Elrabin said:https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/a-curious-use-case-for-camm2-memory-modules-on-desktops-liquid-cooling
it's basically the same "pads" in a modern CPU
The "pins" are on the socket on the board -
bit_user
Maybe, if you're talking about commodity disposable hardware that currently uses soldered RAM. However, the issue for servers is that you don't want to throw out a whole CPU module, just because one of the memory chips has failed. That's why replaceable modules are such a win.das_stig said:Can SOCAMM come a standard depends if it becomes a free design, if not then no, as nobody will be willing to pay even a fraction of a cent per unit.
It's similar to the reason why servers use socketed CPUs, when going BGA would be more energy-efficient and a little cheaper. -
Elrabin
I couldn't find a picture of SOCAMM. CAMM, CAMM2 and SOCAMM all use similar connectivity. Been seeing all of the above in the datacenter for a while nowbit_user said:FWIW, that's not a SOCAMM, but rather CAMM2. Though, the connectivity is probably very similar. -
bit_user
SOCAMM is supposedly only something that came together within the past couple months. As the article said, it's non-standard, and shouldn't (yet) be supported on anything but Nvidia hardware.Elrabin said:I couldn't find a picture of SOCAMM. CAMM, CAMM2 and SOCAMM all use similar connectivity. Been seeing all of the above in the datacenter for a while now
As for the other CAMM stuff, sure. That's been out there, including specs for server-oriented versions. -
Elrabin
I'm a senior principle engineer/architect at a Tier 1 server hardware OEM, i see stuff literally years before it's made public.bit_user said:SOCAMM is supposedly only something that came together within the past couple months. As the article said, it's non-standard, and shouldn't (yet) be supported on anything but Nvidia hardware.
As for the other CAMM stuff, sure. That's been out there, including specs for server-oriented versions.
Can't go into specifics obviously due to NDA, but do you really think that GB300 and the associated technologies surrounding it came into existence in the last few months?