Gigabyte AI TOP 100E SSD features incredible 219,000 TBW endurance rating — 183X more than the venerable Samsung 990 Pro

AI TOP 100E SSD
AI TOP 100E SSD (Image credit: Gigabyte)

Gigabyte launched its AI TOP 100E series of SSDs, aiming to rival the best SSDs around town. With an unparalleled endurance rating of up to 219,000 TBW on the 2TB model, the AI TOP 100E drives target very intensive workloads, such as AI training.

The AI TOP 100E SSD comes in a standard M.2 2280 form factor and utilizes the PCIe 4.0 interface. It's not going to win any pure performance races, especially if you pitch it against the more modern PCIe 5.0 drives. However, its durability ratings are the AI TOP 100E SSD's primary selling point. Sadly, Gigabyte doesn't reveal what kind of 3D NAND flash the company utilizes in the AI TOP 100E SSD or what type of magic it uses to achieve that level of durability. Perhaps it just has a lot of spare NAND, but even that on its own wouldn't be enough to hit the 60 drive writes per day (DWPD) rating.

The company only mentions an "AI TOP" utility that seemingly offloads the processing work of large datasets from the graphics card's VRAM or the system's RAM to the AI TOP 100E SSD. The approach intends to expand the memory pool size so the user can fine-tune large AI models. That's why Gigabyte made the AI TOP 100E SSD as durable as it is.

Gigabyte rates the 1TB and 2TB models for an eye-popping 109,500 TBW and 219,500 TBW, respectively. That's equal to nearly 17 hours per day of continuous 2 TB/s writes for five years on the larger drive — an imposing figure that rivals enterprise and data center-grade SSDs. Comparing the AI TOP 100E SSD to the Samsung 990 Pro, one of the top PCIe 4.0 SSDs, Gigabyte's drives offer up to 183X more endurance at the same 1TB and 2TB capacities. The math isn't far from Gigabyte's claims that the AI TOP 100E SSD has a 150X higher TBW rating than a conventional PCIe 4.0 SSD (1,400 TBW).

Gigabyte AI TOP 100E SSD Specifications

Swipe to scroll horizontally
SSDCapacity (TB)Sequential Read (MB/s)Sequential Write (MB/s)Random Read (IOPS)Random Write (IOPS)DRAM Cache (GB)Endurance (TBW)
AI100E2TB27,0005,900??2219,000
AI100E1TB17,2006,500??1109,500

The AI TOP 100E comes in two variants, 1TB and 2TB, with the latter doubling the endurance rating. If we look past the endurance, the AI TOP 100E SSD performs similarly to other PCIe 4.0 SSDs. The 1TB has the higher performance of the duo, with sequential read and write speeds up to 7,200 MB/s and 6,500 MB/s, respectively. The 2TB model has slightly slower specs, with the same 7,200 MB/s sequential reads but only 5,900 MB/s for sequential writes. The 1TB and 2TB models have 1GB and 2GB of LPDDR4 memory, respectively.

Gigabyte didn't reveal the random performance for the AI TOP 100E SSD, so we'll have to work with the sequential numbers to make a comparison. The AI TOP 100E SSD's performance is in the same alley as the Samsung 990 Pro — at least on paper. The Samsung 990 Pro offers sequential read and write speeds up to 7,450 MB/s and 6,900 MB/s, respectively, so it's only around 3.5% and 6.2% faster than the AI TOP 100E SSD.

Gigabyte doesn't market the AI TOP 100E SSD as an enterprise SSD or anything else. The company simply highlights the drive's strong endurance as being great for AI workloads, with the features page stating that "the AI TOP 100E SSD is designed exclusively for intensive AI workloads." Like many consumer drives, Gigabyte backs the AI TOP 100E SSD with a limited five-year warranty or until the TBW is up. The company only recently listed the SSD, so pricing and availability are unknown.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor and Memory Reviewer

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • usertests
    Hard to believe they could get that endurance rating with the usual TLC flash. MLC, SLC?
    Reply
  • Drazen
    My Samsung 970 Pro as MLC drive has 1200 TBW. SLC FLASH goes in 100,000 range but capacity is low and does not exist in consumer world anymore.
    Today everyone in consumer world uses TLC with max 600 TBW.
    So, no way.
    Reply
  • CmdrShepard
    Gigabyte AI TOP...
    Stopped reading right there.
    Reply
  • Li Ken-un
    Unless there is a huge catch (like crappy random I/O or huge latency), this product should put all extant M.2 Optanes out to pasture. The highest capacity M.2 Optanes won’t fit on most motherboards and enclosures. And the M.2 2280 ones are capped at 118 GB.
    Reply
  • Notton
    CmdrShepard said:
    Stopped reading right there.
    Why? If you glossed over that part, you get to see it has 219,000TBW endurance with a modest 7000/5900 MB/s read and write speeds.

    That seems pretty amazing, so long as the price isn't equally insane.
    Reply
  • CmdrShepard
    Notton said:
    Why?
    Because I am not going to reward their decision to randomly include a buzzword "AI" in the name of an unrelated product.

    The name is engineered for SEO -- it has both "AI" and "TOP" in it so if you search for AI TOPS you will find it. You may think it's clever, I find it disgusting.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    usertests said:
    Hard to believe they could get that endurance rating with the usual TLC flash. MLC, SLC?

    It's easy to believe. They can use a large amount of NAND for overprovisioning combined with a more optimistic TBW figure since they figure most will either be replaced or fail in some non-NAND way before then. It's been a while since one has been performed, TheTechReport did one 10 years ago, and the Samsung 840 lasted over 2.5x past its 73TBW rating before any uncorrectable errors popped up, and much longer past that while still in a usable state. Drive controllers have much greater ECC capabilities than they used to, and NAND is more durable, so the TBW figure is just what they feel comfortable with warranting it at, not the actual lifespan.

    Reply
  • USAFRet
    And in normal consumer use, or even most corporate use...100 times infinity is still infinity.

    I've asked this before, but I'll ask again...

    Have any of you ever had a solid state drive die from too many write cycles?
    Not just dead (I've had that), but specifically from going over the warranty TBW, AND it actually went into read only mode, or whatever that particular drive does.

    If so, please list the specific drive make/model, and the relevant numbers.
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    CmdrShepard said:
    Because I am not going to reward their decision to randomly include a buzzword "AI" in the name of an unrelated product.

    The name is engineered for SEO -- it has both "AI" and "TOP" in it so if you search for AI TOPS you will find it. You may think it's clever, I find it disgusting.

    It is for a specialized AI workload so why not have AI and/or TOPS in the name? It's an amazing piece of technology that is unmatched in the industry.
    Reply
  • parkerthon
    CRamseyer said:
    It is for a specialized AI workload so why not have AI and/or TOPS in the name? It's an amazing piece of technology that is unmatched in the industry.
    Sure, it’s unmatched, but to what end? Who is running AI workloads on a workstation? And what are they running exactly? Like this is gigabyte. Who is running an expensive AI model, where the highest cost is the GPU, on a consumer brand ssd? It’s like taking a ford fiesta but dropping in an engine that runs 200k miles between oil changes.
    Reply