AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX and 5975WX Review: Sheer Threaded Dominance

Threadripping with 64 Zen 3 cores.

Threadripper Pro 5995WX 5975WX
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Threadripper Pro 5995WX and 5975WX deliver simply unmatched performance and capabilities courtesy of industry-leading core counts and connectivity that easily outstrips all competitors.

Pros

  • +

    Unmatched performance in threaded work

  • +

    Competitive single-thread performance

  • +

    Industry-leading 128 lanes of PCIe 4.0

  • +

    Octo-channel memory

Cons

  • -

    Expensive chip pricing

  • -

    Expensive motherboard pricing

  • -

    Limited DIY motherboard options

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The new 64-core AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX and 32-core Threadripper Pro 5975WX are finally available at retail, breaking free from the confines of pre-built OEM systems to contend for a spot on our list of best CPUs for workstations. They have a tough act to follow: AMD's previous-gen Threadripper CPUs delivered a crushing blow to the entrenched Intel's HEDT and workstation lineup, with the consumer models essentially muscling Team Blue out of the high end desktop (HEDT) market entirely while the Pro models relegated Intel to an also-ran in the workstation market.

But there's a problem for enthusiasts — Intel abandoned the consumer-oriented high end desktop (HEDT) market after its crushing defeat three years ago, and now that AMD is the only game in town for HEDT chips, it's also dropping the segment.

AMD says it will no longer make the more affordable non-Pro Threadripper models. Instead, we get the Threadripper Pro chips that are priced for professionals and come with all the trimmings to justify the price tag, like the Zen 3 architecture, clock speeds up to 4.5 GHz, 128 lanes of PCIe 4.0, and eight DDR4 memory channels that deliver unmatchable workstation performance.

AMD's original Threadripper chips (and supporting motherboards) were geared for HEDT, meaning they came with higher core counts and access to more memory and PCIe connectivity than mainstream desktop PC chips. However, pricing was still mostly within reach for enthusiasts. After several generations, AMD released its Threadripper Pro models with twice the number of memory channels (eight) for professional users and unique motherboards, but the beefy chips carried the eye-watering pricing to match their incredible performance.

AMD then maintained two lineups, one for consumers and one for professional workstations, but they had different pricing tiers even though they were based on the same underlying architecture. AMD changes that with the Threadripper 5000 WX-series, unifying the standard HEDT models with the professional lineup, meaning there's now only one line of chips and motherboards for both OEM workstations and DIYers — Threadripper Pro and the WRX80 platform. 

Swipe to scroll horizontally
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5000 WX-Series Specifications
Row 0 - Cell 0 Cores / Threads MSRP/SEP Base / Boost (GHz) L3 Cache (MB) TDP PCIe
Threadripper Pro 5995WX 64 / 128 $6,499 2.7 / 4.5 256 (8CCD + I/OD) 280W 128
Threadripper Pro 5975WX 32 / 64 $3,299 3.6 / 4.5 128 (4CCD + I/OD) 280W 128
Threadripper Pro 5965WX 24 / 48 $2,399 3.8 / 4.5 128 (4CCD + I/OD) 280W 128
Threadripper 5955WX 16 / 32 OEM-only 4.0 / 4.5 64 280W 128
Threadripper Pro 5945WX 12 / 24 OEM-only 4.1 / 4.5 64 280W 128
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • -Fran-
    I love the latching mechanism of sWRX8. They should consider using it in consumer as well. I mean, they're already going to ask for a pretty penny on the current one, so why not just make the mechanism the best in the industry?

    And this looks quite impressive, specially since these can also do games quite well it seems. I wonder if AMD will ever put a "mini-Milan-X" in sWRX8 for whomever can pay for it? XD

    Regards.
    Reply
  • escksu
    I am hoping tomshardware could test on win11 or server 2022. This is because these 2 OS by default will allow apps to use all available threads

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/procthread/processor-groups
    Reply
  • Wisecracker
    Snagged an OEM ThinkStation P620 Workstation 16 or so months ago from RTP for $2,400 with ...AMD Ryzen TR Pro 3945WX
    32GB DDR4-3200 RDIMM ECC
    Quadro P2200 5GB - 4x DP_1.4
    Marvell 10Gb Ethernet
    512 GB M.2 Gen 3 PCIe SSDBuilt software RAID with 1TB Samsung SSDs, updated softwares (primarily Vegas Pro) with Canon SLR stuff and fancy appurtenances. Will do a minute -- in 30 seconds.

    Other than a !%$@!*^ noisy PSU fan, it has been bulletproof ___ BUT, our good friends at AMD are taking advantage of their captured market. OEM prices easily are up 50% ...
    Reply
  • Sylwah
    Not a great article: this is a workstation processor and you're leading with gaming benchmarks, and continue to mostly cover gaming.

    Then there's the Windows 10/11 discussion.

    Please do better next time.
    Reply
  • Guy Rouillier
    "The problem is AMD has left the two lower-end 12- and 16-core Pro models as OEM-only, so they won't come to retail."

    NewEgg has the Threadripper PRO 5955WX available now for $1299:

    https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro-5955wx/p/N82E16819113776
    That's a pretty hefty entry price for a home system, but it is available. The quad channel memory of the 3000 series was also better matched to the enthusiast market; only servers and high-end workstations benefit from the 8-channel memory. But I understand AMD's position; they are supply-constrained, so might as well go for the highest-priced markets available.
    Reply
  • This is not an option for home DIY builders, unless they have more money than sense

    This is a workstation class processor and this is what we use at work on our workstations with tons of RAM and lots of storage so we can run as many virtual machines at once as we need for software development and testing

    Threadrippers are all we use. we don’t bother with intel because they have NOTHING to touch it
    Reply
  • Guy Rouillier
    Mandark said:
    This is not an option for home DIY builders, unless they have more money than sense

    I wouldn't necessarily disagree with that, given the cost of a complete system on this platform. I was also a professional software developer, now retired. The last system I built for myself around 2013, which I'm still using, is a dual AMD Opteron 4234 with 16 GB of memory and all SSD storage. If I were to build a new system today, it would be with Threadripper. Though as I mentioned, for software development 8 memory channels is overkill; 4 really was the sweet spot. I ran our complete runtime environment on my system: a DBMS (Oracle or PostgreSQL), a web server with a JavaEE stack, a JBoss app server, plus all my development tools (Eclipse, etc.)

    So, there is still a need for powerful workstation-class systems for individual end-users, but the numbers are small compared to the overall size of the market.
    Reply