Can Your Old Athlon 64 Still Game?
Game Benchmarks: F.E.A.R.
F.E.A.R. is an intense, edge-of-your-seat shooter released in October 2005. It’s very GPU-intensive and does not support multi-threading. For our tests, we use the game’s built-in performance test and ran it at max details, max system specs, and 16x anisotropic filtering.
Taking a look at the performance without FSAA, at 1024x768 we see a 10 FPS average frame rate separation between each CPU on with the dual-core X2 4200+ providing the least performance. The A64 4000+ is able to pull halfway up to the X2 5600+ in average FPS.
Things change quickly as we up the resolution. At 1280x1024, just 5 FPS separate the bottom and top CPU in average frame rates. At 1600x1200, we see just how demanding of GPU horsepower F.E.A.R. really is, as performance is close between all three processors.
Increasing the GPU strain more with 4x FSAA, we see almost no difference between the three processors. As we raise the resolution, the 8800 GS is clearly the limiting factor.
We are able to see at low resolutions that dual core provides no real advantage in this game. But it’s also clear that all three of these CPUs are fine for this game, while at stock clock speeds the 8800 GS was unable to handle 1600x1200 max details and 4X FSAA.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Game Benchmarks: F.E.A.R.
Prev Page Synthetic Benchmarks Next Page Game Benchmarks: Far Cry-
Schip FIRST POST!!! Nice Article though. I knew my brother would soon be doomed with his P4 2.8c ;)Reply -
"AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200 + dual-core, which has a 2.2 GHz Manchester architecture with 512 MB L2 cache per core."Reply
oau! that's a lot of cache :D -
neiroatopelcc I haven't read the actual article yet, but I bet the simple answer is no!Reply
I've got a backup gaming rig at home that barely cuts it. An x2 1.9ghz (oc'ed to 2.4) with an 8800gtx and 3gb memory. That rig struggles at 1280x1024 in some situations, and it can only be attributed to the cpu really. -
bf2gameplaya 2.8GHz Opteron 185 (up from 2.6GHz) with 2x1MB L2 cache is the ultimate s939 CPU....blows these weak benchmarks away.Reply
Who would have thought DDR would have such durability? There's something to be said for CAS2! -
neiroatopelcc But your opteron cpu still limits the modern graphics cards.Reply
Two years back I bought my 8800gtx, and realized it wouldn't come to its full potential in my opteron 170 (@ 2.7). A friend with another gtx paired with an e6400 chip (@ 3ghz) scored a full 30% higher in 3dmark than I, and it showed in games. Even in wow where you'd expect a casio calculator would deliver enough graphics power.
In short - ye ddr still work if you've got enthusiast parts, but that can't negate the effect a faster cpu would give. At least at decent resolutions (22" wide) -
dirtmountain This is a great article! It will give me something to show when i'm talking to people about a new system or just a GPU/PSU upgrade. Great job by Henningsen.Reply -
NoIncentive I'm still using a P4 3.0 @ 3.4 with 1 GB DDR 400 and an nVidia 6800GT...Reply
I'm building a new computer next week. -
randomizer I can echo the findings in Crysis. It didn't matter what settings I ran with a 3700 Sandy and an X1950 pro, the framerate was almost the same (albeit low 20s because the card is slower). Added an E6600 to the mix and my framerate tripled at lower settings.Reply
It would have been interesting to see how a 3000+ Clawhammer (C0 stepping) would do in Crysis. Single-channel memory, poor overclocking capabilities... FAIL! -
ravenware bf2gameplaya2.8GHz Opteron 185 (up from 2.6GHz) with 2x1MB L2 cache is the ultimate s939 CPU....blows these weak benchmarks away.Who would have thought DDR would have such durability? There's something to be said for CAS2!Reply
Thia ia true about the DDR. I recall an article on toms right after the release of the AM2 socket which tested identical dual core processors against their 939 counterparts; the tests showed little to no performance gains.
Great article, their has been some discussion about this in the forums as well.
I currently own a 939 4200+ x2 that's paired with a 7800GT; and this article shows what I thought to be accurate about the AMD64 chips. Their not as fast as some of the C2D's but they still kick ass.
Good job pointing out the single core factor in newer games too. As soon as the crysis demo was released I upgraded my San Diego core to a dual core and noticed the difference in crysis immediately.
This article gives me further confidence in my decision to hold on upgrading my system. I want to hold out for Windows7 D3D11 and more money to build an ape sh** machine :D
Nice article!!