Scaling Down Gulftown: From Six Cores To One
After having looked at AMD’s six-core Phenom II X6 across all of its possible core configurations, it’s time to do the same with Intel’s Core i7-980X flagship. How do performance, power consumption, and power efficiency change when fewer cores are utilized? Is the 32 nm Core i7 top model best with all six cores, or does some combination of fewer core deliver the optimal experience?
The testing we did on AMD's Thuban-based six-core chip revealed two important things.
First, we had to realize that many applications still don't benefit from multiple cores. Users would realize much more performance if software did a better job of supporting the available hardware. We find it frustrating to see AMD and Intel deliver extremely powerful CPUs only to have their potential remain underutilized, especially in mainstream applications.
Our second finding was about efficiency. The Phenom II X6 shows the best performance per watt with all six cores active, as performance gains are more substantial than the additional power required to operate the higher core count.
Is this also the case on Intel’s flagship? Does using all six cores provide the best power efficiency? Will power consumption in idle decrease if we switch off individual cores? Let’s find out.
Current page: Scaling Down Gulftown: From Six Cores To OneNext Page Turbo Boost And Our Test Platform
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.