Three Core i7 Systems From Boutique Builders
Features
published
Benchmark Results: Productivity
The margin of victory isn’t as wide here, but the faster processor in the CyberPower machine enables it to take yet another first-place finish, with AVADirect following closely behind and Alienware trailing the field.
WinZIP might not be optimized for four-core processors, but CyberPower’s superior clock speed carries the day, leaving Alienware and AVADirect bobbing in its wake.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Productivity
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Media Next Page Benchmark Results: Synthetics (3DMark Vantage)More about desktops
99 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
crisisavatar all 3 suck concidering you can add a 24 inch monitor, high quality speakers, audio card, gaming mouse/keyboard and still have money to spare.Reply
ps. running a couple of gtx 260s at stock will be more than enough to pull 45 fps in crysis and everything else at idk fps. -
crisisavatar ups forgot to add the new OCZ vortex 30g ssd in raid 0 to boot up and still be in budget.Reply -
pivalak Hummm, what I tend to miss on these reviews is an actual measurement of the noise generated by the system.Reply
I mean, the subjective evaluation provided is still useful, but... how noisy is "surprisingly quiet" or "the loudest of the three machines"? -
pivalak Hummm, what I tend to miss on these reviews is an actual measurement of the noise generated by the system.Reply
I mean, the subjective evaluation provided is still useful, but... how noisy is "surprisingly quiet" or "the loudest of the three machines"? -
pivalak Hummm, what I tend to miss on these reviews is an actual measurement of the noise generated by the system.Reply
I mean, the subjective evaluation provided is still useful, but... how noisy is "surprisingly quiet" or "the loudest of the three machines" in this case? -
pivalak Oooops... sorry for the multiple posts. I had some issues with my browser (does anyone know how to delete them?) :(Reply -
nerrawg Kind of surprised that Thomas Soderstrom's (is he swedish btw?) $2,500 core i7 build from December wasn't mentioned from what I could see for comparison.Reply
If anyone is curious how tom's home-build system compares to the boutiques here's the link: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-overclock,2116.html
From the gaming benches on that review it appears that the now slightly outdated december build still trumps the above builds with its triple 260 SLI and 4.0 Ghz overclocked 920. Best value award goes Tom's own Build! Now if only that one came pre-built with a 3 year warranty .... guess I'll still be getting out my toolkit (no pun intended)
-
MrMick pivalakHummm, what I tend to miss on these reviews is an actual measurement of the noise generated by the system.I mean, the subjective evaluation provided is still useful, but... how noisy is "surprisingly quiet" or "the loudest of the three machines" in this case?Reply
Hi, I'm the author of the story. Trying to objectively measure a system's noise levels without sophisticated measurement equipment is as problematic as describing them subjectively.
I have a level meter, but decided not to use it because it wasn't sensitive enough to measure noise levels where it mattered--at ear level where I was seated. I needed to measure the ambient room noise with no computers running to set a basis for comparison, and the meter wasn't sensitive enough to do that.
And even if the meter was sensitive enough for my purpose, the decibel measurement would be relevant only for the environment in which I was testing (my home office, which measures 13.6x8 feet).
-
“No one ever got laughed at for buying an Alienware.”Reply
Are you kidding? They have to be the most overpriced POS on the market.
Pfft. Alienware = glorified console.
Real PC gamers build their own. Period.