Two Seagate Barracuda ST3500620AS (500 GB) in RAID 0
Fujitsu MBA3147RC SAS (147 GB) and Seagate Barracuda ST315003141AS (1.5 TB)
Two Hitachi Deskstar (500 GB) in RAID 0 and Western Digital WD10EACS (1 TB)
Optical
LG Electronics Super-Multi GH22NP20
Two TSST CDDVDW SH-S223Q
Sony BR-5100S 20X Blu-ray, plus Sony 20x DVD-RW
CPU Cooling
Alienware custom heatsink/fan
CoolIT Domino ALC
Asetek LCLC
GPU Cooling
Stock heatsink/fan
Stock heatsink/fan
Stock heatsink/fan
LAN
Marvell Yukon 88E8056 (dual Gigabit)
Marvell Yukon 88E8056 (dual Gigabit)
Marvell Yukon 88E8056 (dual Gigabit)
Media Reader
None
68-in-1
12-in-1
Operating System
Windows Vista Home Premium (64-bit)
Windows Vista Home Premium (64-bit)
Windows Vista Home Premium (64-bit)
Enclosure
Alienware Custom
Thermaltake V9
Cooler Master Storm Sniper
Power Supply
Alienware Custom (750 watts)
Corsair TX750W (750 watts)
Thermaltake Toughpower (600 watts)
Benchmarks and Settings
Swipe to scroll horizontally
3D Games Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmarks
Details
Far Cry
Version: 1.02, Video Mode: 1280x960, no AA, Overall Quality Very High and 1920x1200, 4x AA, Overall Quality Very High, Demo: Far Cry 2 benchmark tool, Ranch Mediu
Supreme Commander
Version: 1.5.359, Video Mode: 1920x1200 Fidelity Preset: Low and 1920x1200 Fidelity Preset: High, Demo: WallaceTX_006_00, Benchmark: Fraps 2.9.4 – Built 7037
Unreal Tournament 3
Version: 1.2, Video Mode: 1920x1200, Texture and Level Details 1; and 1920x1200, Texture and Level Details 5, Sound and DirectX 10; Window off, Demo: CTF-Reflection_fly, Time: 12/60
World In Conflict
Version 1.0.0.9, Video mode: 1920x1200, Very Low Details and 1920x1200, Very High Detail, Demo: Game Benchmark
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Media Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmarks
Details
DivX
Version: 6.8.3,- Main Menu -, Default, - Codec Menu -, Encoding Mode: Insane Quality, Enhanced multi-threading, Enabled using SSE4, Quarter-pixel search, - Video Menu -, Quantization: MPEG-2
iTunes
Version: 8.0.2Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 minDefault format to AAC
LAME MP3
Version 3.98Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 minWAV to MP3, 160Kbps
MainConcept Reference Reference H.264 Plugin Pro
Version 1.5.1 MPEG2 to MPEG2 (H.264) MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec28 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG2)Audio: MPEG2 (44.1KHz, 2 channel, 16-bit, 224Kbs)Codec: H.264Mode: PAL (25 FPS)Profile: Tom’s Hardware Settings for Qct-Core
Nero 8 Recode
Version: Nero Recode 3.1.4.0 Record entire DVD to DVDDefault settings
Version: 1.02, GPU and CPU Scores obtained with Performance Preset
PCMark Vantage
Version 1.00, System, Memories, Productivity and Hard Drive Benchmarks
SiSoftware Sandra XII
Version: 2008.5.14.24, CPU Test=CPU Arithmetic/MultiMedia, Memory Test=Bandwidth Benchmark
Swipe to scroll horizontally
A/C Power Consumption
Kill-A-Watt P4400
Each system’s A/C power draw measured at the wall in watts at idle and then while running the Far Cry 2 benchmark using a P3 Kill-A-Watt P4400 power meter
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hummm, what I tend to miss on these reviews is an actual measurement of the noise generated by the system.
I mean, the subjective evaluation provided is still useful, but... how noisy is "surprisingly quiet" or "the loudest of the three machines" in this case?
Kind of surprised that Thomas Soderstrom's (is he swedish btw?) $2,500 core i7 build from December wasn't mentioned from what I could see for comparison.
If anyone is curious how tom's home-build system compares to the boutiques here's the link: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-overclock,2116.html
From the gaming benches on that review it appears that the now slightly outdated december build still trumps the above builds with its triple 260 SLI and 4.0 Ghz overclocked 920. Best value award goes Tom's own Build! Now if only that one came pre-built with a 3 year warranty .... guess I'll still be getting out my toolkit (no pun intended)
pivalakHummm, what I tend to miss on these reviews is an actual measurement of the noise generated by the system.I mean, the subjective evaluation provided is still useful, but... how noisy is "surprisingly quiet" or "the loudest of the three machines" in this case?
Hi, I'm the author of the story. Trying to objectively measure a system's noise levels without sophisticated measurement equipment is as problematic as describing them subjectively.
I have a level meter, but decided not to use it because it wasn't sensitive enough to measure noise levels where it mattered--at ear level where I was seated. I needed to measure the ambient room noise with no computers running to set a basis for comparison, and the meter wasn't sensitive enough to do that.
And even if the meter was sensitive enough for my purpose, the decibel measurement would be relevant only for the environment in which I was testing (my home office, which measures 13.6x8 feet).