Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Advanced Transient Response Tests
For details about our transient response testing, please click here.
In the real world, power supplies are always working with loads that change. It's of immense importance, then, for the PSU to keep its rails within the ATX specification's defined ranges. The smaller the deviations, the more stable your PC will be with less stress applied to its components.
We should note that the ATX spec requires capacitive loading during the transient rests, but in our methodology, we also choose to apply a worst case scenario with no additional capacitance on the rails.
Advanced Transient Response at 20% – 20ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 12.126V | 11.927V | 1.65% | Pass |
5V | 5.017V | 4.879V | 2.75% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.318V | 3.152V | 5.01% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.010V | 4.938V | 1.44% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 20% – 10ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 12.126V | 11.969V | 1.30% | Pass |
5V | 5.017V | 4.903V | 2.27% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.318V | 3.145V | 5.21% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.010V | 4.956V | 1.07% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 20% – 1ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 12.126V | 11.963V | 1.35% | Pass |
5V | 5.017V | 4.896V | 2.41% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.318V | 3.145V | 5.23% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.010V | 4.938V | 1.44% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 50% – 20ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 12.074V | 11.905V | 1.40% | Pass |
5V | 5.008V | 4.893V | 2.30% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.304V | 3.127V | 5.37% | Fail |
5VSB | 4.975V | 4.907V | 1.36% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 50% – 10ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 12.074V | 11.896V | 1.47% | Pass |
5V | 5.008V | 4.865V | 2.86% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.304V | 3.129V | 5.30% | Fail |
5VSB | 4.976V | 4.908V | 1.37% | Pass |
Advanced Transient Response at 50% – 1ms
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 12.074V | 11.916V | 1.31% | Pass |
5V | 5.007V | 4.889V | 2.35% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.304V | 3.121V | 5.54% | Fail |
5VSB | 4.976V | 4.918V | 1.17% | Pass |
Transient response is good at 12V, decent at 5V and mediocre at 3.3V.
Turn-On Transient Tests
In the next set of tests, we measure the PSU's response in simpler transient load scenarios—during its power-on phase. Ideally, we don't want to see any voltage overshoots or spikes since those put a lot of stress on the DC-DC converters of installed components.
There is a notable step at 5VSB, and the 12V slopes are not so smooth. Nonetheless, these results won't create any issues.
Power Supply Timing Tests
There are several signals generated by the power supply, which need to be within specified, by the ATX spec, ranges. If they are not, there can be compatibility issues with other system parts, especially mainboards. From year 2020, the PSU's Power-on time (T1) has to be lower than 150ms and the PWR_OK delay (T3) from 100 to 150ms, to be compatible with the Alternative Sleep Mode.
T1 (Power-on time) & T3 (PWR_OK delay) | ||
---|---|---|
Load | T1 | T3 |
20% | 32ms | 133ms |
100% | 39ms | 133ms |
PSU Timing Charts
The PWR_OK delay is within the 100-150ms region, so the PSU supports the alternative sleep mode recommended by the ATX spec.
Ripple Measurements
Ripple represents the AC fluctuations (periodic) and noise (random) found in the PSU's DC rails. This phenomenon significantly decreases the capacitors' lifespan because it causes them to run hotter. A 10-degree Celsius increase can cut into a cap's useful life by 50%. Ripple also plays an important role in overall system stability, especially when overclocking is involved.
The ripple limits, according to the ATX specification, are 120mV (+12V) and 50mV (5V, 3.3V, and 5VSB).
Test | 12V | 5V | 3.3V | 5VSB | Pass/Fail |
10% Load | 8.3 mV | 8.5 mV | 12.9 mV | 10.9 mV | Pass |
20% Load | 9.4 mV | 8.4 mV | 15.2 mV | 11.2 mV | Pass |
30% Load | 10.4 mV | 9.6 mV | 16.7 mV | 11.7 mV | Pass |
40% Load | 11.9 mV | 11.0 mV | 17.7 mV | 13.6 mV | Pass |
50% Load | 12.1 mV | 11.6 mV | 18.7 mV | 13.9 mV | Pass |
60% Load | 14.7 mV | 12.2 mV | 20.2 mV | 15.9 mV | Pass |
70% Load | 19.3 mV | 11.6 mV | 22.4 mV | 18.7 mV | Pass |
80% Load | 24.3 mV | 12.3 mV | 24.8 mV | 33.3 mV | Pass |
90% Load | 29.4 mV | 13.6 mV | 25.9 mV | 39.4 mV | Pass |
100% Load | 38.3 mV | 18.0 mV | 30.8 mV | 23.5 mV | Pass |
110% Load | 45.8 mV | 20.9 mV | 31.7 mV | 25.3 mV | Pass |
Crossload 1 | 23.4 mV | 13.0 mV | 22.8 mV | 40.5 mV | Pass |
Crossload 2 | 11.0 mV | 11.3 mV | 10.7 mV | 24.8 mV | Pass |
Crossload 3 | 16.9 mV | 10.0 mV | 21.8 mV | 32.4 mV | Pass |
Crossload 4 | 39.2 mV | 15.6 mV | 21.1 mV | 14.0 mV | Pass |
Ripple suppression is decent. It would be nice, though, to see the same ripple levels with the previous CM750M unit.
Ripple At Full Load
Ripple At 110% Load
Ripple At Cross-Load 1
Ripple At Cross-Load 4
EMC Pre-Compliance Testing – Average & Quasi-Peak EMI Detector Results
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) is the ability of a device to operate properly in its environment without disrupting the proper operation of other nearby devices.
Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) stands for the electromagnetic energy a device emits, and it can cause problems in other nearby devices if too high. For example, it can cause increased static noise in your headphones or/and speakers.
΅We use TekBox's EMCview to conduct our EMC pre-compliance testing.
EMI emissions are low. The corresponding filter does a splendid job!
MORE: Best Power Supplies
MORE: How We Test Power Supplies
MORE: All Power Supply Content
Current page: Transient Response Tests, Timing Tests, Ripple Measurements and EMC Pre-Compliance Testing
Prev Page Protection Features, DC Power Sequencing, Cross-Load Tests and Infrared Images Next Page Performance, Noise, Efficiency and Power FactorAris Mpitziopoulos is a contributing editor at Tom's Hardware, covering PSUs.
-
Co BIY Another great review!Reply
Why do you prefer a full modular cable set up to this semi-modular ? At this price point I think semi-modular is "best". One less failure point and greater efficiency. I don't think custom cabling is a consideration for this range. I think Semi-modular should be considered best practice outside of Vanity/RGB/Bling focused lines.
For appearance sake I do think the exit point of a semi-modular "main cable" of could be made to visually match the other cables without giving up the advantages.