Page 1:Time To Follow-Up
Page 2:Test Methodology: How Do You Make It A Fairer Fight?
Page 3:Test System And Benchmarks
Page 4:Synthetic Benchmarks: 3DMark And PCMark Vantage
Page 5:Synthetic Benchmarks: SiSoftware Sandra
Page 6:Application Benchmarks: Audio Encoding
Page 7:Application Benchmarks: Video Encoding And Image Rendering
Page 8:Application Benchmarks: General Usage
Page 9:Game Benchmarks
Page 10:Multitasking Benchmarks
Page 11:Simulated Dual-Core Versus Actual Dual-Core Comparison
Page 12:Performance Analysis
Now that we've seen the evidence, our overall conclusion remains consistent with the previous one: we still don't think you need to be a power user to enjoy the benefits of a multi-core CPU. Call us spoiled, but we wouldn't seriously consider living with a single-core CPU on a day-to-day basis given the amount of multitasking going on regularly. The benchmark results clearly show that increasing numbers of CPU cores perform better when multiple applications are run at the same time.
We must point out that CPUs with fewer physical cores are often clocked somewhat higher to help make up for the performance deficit, so the situation certainly isn't dire for those of you who chose dual-core CPUs.
In the final analysis, we'd recommend at least a dual-core CPU to most folks out there. As for the power-user, three or four CPU cores will likely be appreciated and can't be considered overkill if concurrent applications are running.
- Time To Follow-Up
- Test Methodology: How Do You Make It A Fairer Fight?
- Test System And Benchmarks
- Synthetic Benchmarks: 3DMark And PCMark Vantage
- Synthetic Benchmarks: SiSoftware Sandra
- Application Benchmarks: Audio Encoding
- Application Benchmarks: Video Encoding And Image Rendering
- Application Benchmarks: General Usage
- Game Benchmarks
- Multitasking Benchmarks
- Simulated Dual-Core Versus Actual Dual-Core Comparison
- Performance Analysis