Crucial X6 Portable SSD Review: Affordable and Responsive

Powered by a DRAM-less architecture, Crucial’s X6 offers high capacity, portable storage for low cost

Crucial X6 Portable SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Crucial’s X6 is an affordable and very portable USB Type-C SSD that dishes out fast and responsive performance, but its relatively small cache results in reduced performance during larger sustained data transfers.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Sleek, compact, and light design

  • +

    Responsive performance within the cache and fast to recover

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Lacks an activity light

  • -

    Lacks USB-C to USB-A adapter

  • -

    Lacks hardware-based AES 256-bit encryption

  • -

    Slow after cache write is exhausted during sustained workloads

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Crucial’s X6 is a well-designed USB 3.1 Gen-2 Type-C SSD that’s highly portable and compatible with nearly any host with a USB port. With a heavy focus on value over blazing-high speeds, the X6 is based on similar hardware as the company’s popular BX500 SSD and pushes out up to 540 MBps of sequential read throughput.

In fact, at just $0.09 per GB, the X6 is one of the cheapest portable SSDs at the 2TB capacity point, and it will provide ample performance for your games library or backing up your files, but it falls short under heavy write workloads due to the slow native write speeds of its QLC flash.

Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • Shonk.
    You need to do a new review

    It seems there has been a revision and its an nvme drive and not sata now

    Crucial gave me a free one due to delays with my 64GB of DDR5 it arrived today and it's peaking at 911MB/s

    Reply
  • Shonk.
    Updated with a 12900K instead of a 9900KS

    932.7 MB/s

    Reply
  • solfizz
    Shonk. said:
    Updated with a 12900K instead of a 9900KS

    932.7 MB/s

    Hey, if you get this, is your drive still running at those speeds? Also what RAM reader is that? Thanks in advance!
    Reply