Value In SLI? GTX 260 Core 216 Vs. GTX 280

By Thomas Soderstrom
published

Benchmark Results: First Person Shooters

At $2,500, $1,250, and $625, our System Builder Marathon machines were designed to game at 1920x1200, 1680x1050, and 1280x1024 resolutions. Even though we didn’t build for the 30” display market, we still tested our $2,500 3-way SLI configuration at 2560x1600 pixels to compare it against a former SBM system. The 2560x1600 results have been carried over into today’s 3-way GTX 260 versus 2-way GTX 280 SBM update.

Our 3-way SLI configuration wouldn’t even run Crysis at 2560x1600 pixels with very high settings and AA enabled, but the 2-way GTX 280’s does it so slowly that the results at this high setting are meaningless. At resolutions up to 1920x1200, the 3-way GTX 260’s show remarkably improved performance. (Ed.: If you remember back to our GeForce GTX 295 Preview, the same Crysis problem plagued that card as well--Nvidia has confirmed that this is a driver issue and not some artifact of running a trio of GTX 260s, as we've seen suggested).

Two GTX 280s beat three Core 216 GTX 260s in UT3, but both solutions are so fast that the game doesn’t even need SLI to be playable at its highest settings.

Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
67 Comments Comment from the forums
  • The_Blood_Raven
    ....so 2 GTX 280s generally out perform 3 GTX 260s and you count it as a win because its best in Crysis? Also 2 4870 X2s perform a decent amount above 2 GTX 280s and the extra funds could have been relocated. While I did not mind the last build I do see their point. You have 2 options, you focus on gaming performance even though a $2000+ system should do more, or you focus on a balanced system but at the detriment to gaming. Neither option is truly wrong so its up to the builder and their expectations. I think the builders of that system chose what they wanted to focus on and thats it.

    I thought that the only problem was that one of the builds performed less than the last one at the same price point. But then again I am used to the comments section of such articles being full of whinners and idiots so its not much of a surprise...
    Reply
  • jaragon13
    How about GTX 260 in SLI versus GTX 260 core 216 in SLI,versus a single GTX 280? lol,that'd be single sided.
    Reply
  • kelfen
    interesting to see two be at par with 3! and maybe compare them to 4870x2 to throw into the mix
    Reply
  • ginbong46
    I would choose 280 SLI over 260 TRI SLI anyday even if it was cheaper than the 280 SLI. 1 less card to deal with and less chance for driver problems.

    285 SLI is looking interesting
    Reply
  • Onus
    I think this reinforces the idea that if you're thinking of SLI, don't, unless you're getting all the cards now. If you're getting just one card now and waiting until you can afford the next one(s), your money might be better spent on just waiting for the best of the next generation.
    Reply
  • toosober
    I agree with others, it would benefit the community if a single and pair of 4870x2s were used in this review as well.
    This was a good review, it pointed out to us that buying 3 260s is not so beneficial, Crysis is a great game, but it is not the deciding factor for the purchase of my next video card.
    Reply
  • Pei-chen
    2 really hot girls or 3 above average girls....LOL.

    If I really want SLI I would choose as fewer cards as possible. The driver mess and inefficient scaling makes no sense to get more than two cards. GTX 295 > GTX 280 x2 > GTX 260 x3 > 9800GT x4.
    Reply
  • Pei-chen
    The_Blood_Raven....Also 2 4870 X2s perform a decent amount above 2 GTX 280s and the extra funds could have been relocated....A 4870 X2 costs around $500. A GTX 280 $330. $500 x 2 = $1000 > $330 x 2 = $660 so what extra funds are you talking about?
    Reply
  • PrangeWay
    I sortof dislike how much people depend on Crysis as a benchmark. Despite it's awesome gameplay and graphics, there has NEVER, EVER, been a more poorly optimized game. It seems a crap shoot on what sortof performance even high end graphics card will put out when using it...

    Better to notice the fact the 280x2 consistently beats the 260x3 except in the one game that sets the standards for erratic performance results.
    Reply
  • akandy
    Well I would just like to add..... VALUE SHMALUE!! SPEND SPEND SPEND!!! As long as I have enough money left over to make some katsup soup and play all my games on full rez I'm happy.
    Reply