GeForce 9600 GT/GTS 250/GTX 260 Non-Reference Roundup
Asus ENGTS250 Dark Knight 1G, Cont’d
The card sports a standard dual-DVI output configuration, along with a composite video output. All of the usual output options are covered with included adapters.
The clock speeds here are similar to those of the reference card: 740 MHz on the core, 1,836 MHz on the shaders, and 1,100 MHz (2,200 MHz DDR) on the memory.
Overclocking
We overclocked the card using Asus’ bundled SmartDoctor utility. It’s a fairly standard utility with all the requisite settings we needed to get a good boost out of our ENGTS250 test sample.
The core overclock we achieved was very good for a GeForce GTS 250. We realized a 100 MHz increase on the core and 104 MHz from the shaders.
The memory also provided a reasonable boost, but it didn’t take us as far as we would have hoped. The highest stable memory clock we could achieve was 1,174 MHz (2,348 DDR).
(Ed.: it's worth noting here that you can achieve similar overclocking results, and set up custom profiles, using Nvidia's own System Tools with ESA support tool, found here)
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Asus ENGTS250 Dark Knight 1G, Cont’d
Prev Page Asus ENGTS250 Dark Knight 1G Next Page Zotac GeForce GTS250 AMP! EditionThere's a budget GeForce GPU selling in China that not even Nvidia knew it made — RTX 4010 turns out to be a modified RTX A400 workstation GPU
US to patch loopholes that allow China to buy banned AI GPUs from other countries — new regulations include national quotas on GPU exports and a global licensing system
-
Mottamort I was rather disappointed with this article. Not the article itself but with the slightly misleading Title/Intro. When clicking the article I thought I was going to find a massive battle between these vendors on different tiers, instead you show us different instances of 2 slightly different cards of the same type from one vendor....if that makes senseReply
I mean you have Gigabyte vs Gigabyte in the 9600gt section, Asus vs Asus in the 250 section and so on.
:-/ -
dragonsprayer Great articleReply
i wish it had more cards, i think you need 4 parts, try some back cards like the 4870x2 darkknight? good stuff as always!
thx! -
crisisavatar wow how is the gts 250 performing so close to the gtx 260 wasn't the gtx 260 20% faster ?Reply -
enterco It's not clear to me why are you comparing '3dmark score' when you should post 'GPU score'.... It's a graphics card comparision, not platform comparision.Reply -
randomizer entercoIt's not clear to me why are you comparing '3dmark score' when you should post 'GPU score'.... It's a graphics card comparision, not platform comparision.Nothing but the cards is changed so you're not comparing platforms.Reply -
acasel We cannot see clearly the bang for the buck card there if we ain't seeing some ati cards like the 4770 and others..Reply
The drop down menu sure is fast... :-) -
enterco randomizerNothing but the cards is changed so you're not comparing platforms.Sure. A reason more to show GPU score. 3dmark score is too much influenced by CPU's power, and it's no longer relevant, the way it used to be once...Reply
By using a Quad Core and a low-performing GPU you can achive same 3dmark score as using a dual core combined with a considerably stronger GPU, 3dmark Vantage gives too much credit to CPU. But the overall FPS in games it's often higher in the second case: dual core + better GPU. -
marraco Recent review showed the 260 being neck to neck with the 4870; both in price and performance, those cards are in the same point.Reply
Since my 8800GT should be between the 9600 and the 250, I guess that the best upgrade path is to buy a second 8800GT, reaching probably 260/4870 performance.
I searched the web for 8800GT SLI benckmark running in i7 920, but got no one single review...
I think that tomshardware should review non up-to-date cards as the 8800 and the ATI equivalents, in crossfilre/SLI, since for many users, it should make sense to buy a second card that to upgrade to a 260/4870.
older reviews on those cards does not accounted for the scalability on I7 x58 platform, and probably ATI and Nvidia dedicated more time tweaking drivers for newer cards, so maybe the 8800GT does not perform well today (the SLI on core 2/Quad did not worked very well in the past)