LaCie 12big Thunderbolt 3 DAS Review

Early Verdict

The LaCie 12big is in a class of its own. Creative Professionals can't get enough Thunderbolt 3 and LaCie delivered with more of everything. We wish the system had a little more power to increase redundant storage performance, but if you need more than 100 TB, the 12big can deliver.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Highest drive count in a ThunderBolt 3 storage system

  • +

    RAID 5 ready out of the box

  • +

    Several RAID and strip options

  • +

    Easy software and system Setup

  • +

    Consumes less desk space than a 6x2 device

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    High cost of Entry

  • -

    Inconsistent performance in some workloads

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Features & Specifications

LaCie's new 12big Thunderbolt 3 breaks the direct attached storage mold. The 12big houses up to 12 drives, making it the largest storage tower we've ever tested. The Thunderbolt 3 interface provides twice the raw performance of Thunderbolt 2, and combined with the 12-drive capacity, this tower gives professional users the capacity and throughput to work with 4K, 5K, and even 6K video in real time. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • bjornl
    Your available storage for raid 50 and 60 are wrong. In both cases you double the available data by counting both sides of a mirror when you can only write to one.

    Your wrote:
    Raid 50 60/12
    Raid 60 48/24

    While the correct values are:
    Raid 50 30/6 x 2(mirror) or usable data of 30tb
    Raid 60 24/12 x 2(mirror) or usable data of 24tb
    Reply
  • the nerd 389
    @BJORNL

    You're thinking of RAID 51 and 61 (very rare, to say the least). In raid 50, it's not a mirror, it's a RAID 5 array of RAID 0 arrays. The RAID 0 arrays have two drives worth of capacity, and you lose one of those arrays to the RAID 5 array. The numbers in the article are correct.
    Reply
  • walter.iandolo.work
    Hi, can somebody explain why the distinction between DAS and NAS? Why not pluggin in a GigE port on a DAS and make the same piece of hardware suitable for bot DAS and NAS? I can't imagine how a GigE card would change the price of a 2K system...
    I realize that the scenarios are a bit different, but I don't understand the practical advantages, from the manufacturer's perspective, to distinguish.
    Reply
  • Rookie_MIB
    20518312 said:
    Hi, can somebody explain why the distinction between DAS and NAS? Why not pluggin in a GigE port on a DAS and make the same piece of hardware suitable for bot DAS and NAS? I can't imagine how a GigE card would change the price of a 2K system...
    I realize that the scenarios are a bit different, but I don't understand the practical advantages, from the manufacturer's perspective, to distinguish.

    That really is the main difference between a DAS and a NAS. DAS is Direct Attached Storage, as in via USB, TB, etc. It connects to a host system and is used only by that system. NAS is Network Attached Storage, has it's own operating system, and is only connected to a network via whatever networking protocol is being used. It can be accessed by any other computer system on the network (assuming proper permissions and logins).

    Now, you can take a DAS unit like this, connect it to a computer, and present that on a network as a NAS. So - you have a NAS made up of one (or many) DAS units. Theoretically you could take a TB card which has two TB3 ports per card, put it on a low cost motherboard which has x8/x8, and attach 4 of these to it for 400TB+ of space.

    Reply