Noctua NH-L9x65 Review: Noctua Nano?

Can premium compact cooling provide premium compact cooling?

Noctua NH-L9x65
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

For our CPU cooling tests, we use the same hardware, overclock and configuration for each test to minimize environment variables in testing. This allows for all results across all coolers tested on the platform to be viable as side-by-side examination for direct compare and contrast. Note though, that our test setup for compact systems uses a different CPU and case than our standard cooling setup.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CPU Intel i3-8350k LGA1151 (Coffee Lake), all 4 cores  4.0 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock H370M-ITX/ac
Memory SuperTalent DDR4-3000 (2x8GB)
Storage Inland m.2 2280 NVMe, 256GB
Graphics Gigabyte GTX 1050Ti
Power Supply Silverstone SX800-LTI (SFX-L)
Chassis Silverstone LD03
Monitoring CrystalFontz CFA-633-TMI-KU, 4x Dallas One Wire WR-DOW-Y17 sensors
Fan Control Corsair Commander Pro, 100%/50% PWM Speed profiles (liquid cooling pump always @100%, if applicable)
OS Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Networking  Disconnected, not used
Thermal Compound Arctic MX-4
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Garrett Carver
CPU Cooling Reviewer

Garrett Carver is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering thermal compound comparisons and CPU cooling reviews; both air and liquid, including multiple variations of each.

  • MasterZoen
    I used this in a ITX build for a friend, but Noctua changed their compatibility listings a year later and claim it's no longer suitable for the CPU in his rig, an i5-4690K . I'm curious as to how the cooler compares to a 120 AIO like the Corsair H60.
    Reply
  • agello24
    i have been a fan of TH for years. i STILL dont understand their graphs for cpu coolers. why not post the temp vs this over ambient temp stuff? the max fan temp is 49 over ambient, but 50% is 36. i dont get this.
    Reply