Six New Phenom II And Athlon II CPUs From AMD

Features
By Don Woligroski
published

For the third time in 2010, AMD is adding more speed to its processor lineup. But this time, both the Athlon II and Phenom II CPUs are being included. We spill the beans about the new dual-, triple-, quad-, and hexa-core chips in today’s article.

Benchmark Results: Multitasking

In order to test multitasking capabilities, we run the Crysis benchmark during a WinRAR archive operation. Here are the results:

We can see that multitasking hits dual-core CPUs the hardest, as we would expect, But the Phenom II X4 and X6 models lose a surprising amount of traction compared to their quad-core Intel counterparts. In the case of the Phenom II X6 1075T, we expect that the extra CPU load is preventing Turbo CORE from engaging.

Don Woligroski
75 Comments Comment from the forums
  • aznshinobi
    Do I hear comeback from AMD? Hopefully the Bulldozer shows results with the AM3+/AM3r2 in benchs.
    Reply
  • gkay09
    Good article and the 1075T is a good addition to the 6-Core line...
    And most of all, thanks for confirming that all the current socket will be replaced next year including AMD.
    Reply
  • scifi9000
    I'd love to see these new chips pitted against the T1000 processor.
    Reply
  • eklipz330
    aznshinobiDo I hear comeback from AMD? Hopefully the Bulldozer shows results with the AM3+/AM3r2 in benchs.this is hardly a comeback, they simply filled in segments on the price range with not-so-new products. a little bump in speed, probably better binned, and a few more bucks. seems like the logical thing to do at this point, until bulldozer anyhow
    Reply
  • duk3
    I'd rather it was a 970T at 3.6 ghz with turbo up to 4.1ghz.
    Then again, who wouldn't?
    Reply
  • Gin Fushicho
    I'm still waiting for Bulldozer, I hope that Bulldozer makes AMD king again. If so I'll buy another AMD system. I've been waiting since the early Dualcore Windsor cores.
    Reply
  • spentshells
    nothing new here good on AMD if they keep the prices the same
    the 645 and 450 are really crazy good deals
    Reply
  • Our 6 or their 4... Yeah, I'll still take i7 4 cores over these crappy 6cores. Not to mention, the i7 920 can be pushed another 50% in speed, 1075T can not, and it's more expensive than i7 920.
    Reply
  • cleeve
    MoreCores...1075T can not, and it's more expensive than i7 920.
    At $145, he 1075T is $40 cheaper than any Core i7 I can find online.
    Reply
  • TheStealthyOne
    Yay! :)
    Reply