PNY LX3030 M.2 NVMe SSD Review: Chia Plot Master Flex

Great things happen when you run QLC as SLC

PNY LX3030
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

PNY’s LX3030 is a Chia-plotting workhorse that delivers fast, consistent performance to handle the rigorous demands of plotting and also has the high endurance needed to survive the wear it causes.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    + Fast PCIe 3.0 performance

  • +

    + Write speed does not degrade until full

  • +

    + Very high endurance ratings

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Costly

  • -

    Limited availability

  • -

    Short warranty for 1TB model

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

While standard-grade SSDs will serve the average PC user for years on end, they typically can't handle the rigorous performance demands of plotting Chia. PNY's LX3030, on the other hand, is built specifically with Chia plotting in mind. As a result, it provides both high-performance and enterprise-level endurance, making it a perfect pick if you're starting or still building multi-petabyte Chia coin farms.

The PNY LX3030 is an interesting piece of hardware. It comes powered by Phison's PS5012-E12S SSD controller but it is outfitted with Micron's 96-Layer QLC flash to take on the grizzly challenges of Chia plotting. Now, you may think to yourself, 'wait a minute, QLC flash on a supposedly high-performance and endurance SSD?' In short, yes.

Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • Lord_Moonub
    Great review - really interesting kit. There’s a few extra things that would be great to discuss though.

    Anyone deciding whether to use this for Chia plotting today would probably be comparing to using Intel Optane storage. Since XCH is first came out, a lot of changes have taken place and plotting is now possible using a RAM disk for most of the writes, instead of burning through lots of SSD endurance. Using tools like MadMax, farmers are using all the CPU threads to create one plot very quickly, instead of creating lots of plots in parallel. This also means we need less SSD space in total. We only need maybe 200GB of SSD space, tied with 128GB RAM; rather than “the old days” where we were plotting lots of plots in parallel and used a lot of SSD space (maybe a few TB of SSD space).

    So a great plotting system today probably uses 128GB RAM, and 250GB of Intel Optane storage as the scratch disk. The Optane storage is fast and (like this PNY drive) doesn’t see a performance degradation when the “cache” is filled.

    with this in mind, the comparison for Chia performance probably comes down to the endurance of the drives. This is really what the article is missing right now. What is the cost per plot between these two approaches. (It’s obviously also worth calls this out for the comparison with the other drives. The Corsair and Samsung drives are offering TBW warranties around 600 to 900, and Sabrent have a few up in the 3600TBW. I think from memory Optane is massively higher … but is it still a winning option on $ per TBW versus this PNY drive ?)

    anyway, thanks for the continued interest and coverage on Chia stuff. It isn’t very mainstream so great to see it still covered.
    Reply
  • escksu
    Chia coin mining is basically dead...
    Reply