Skip to main content

AMD Radeon HD 7990: Eight Games And A Beastly Card For $1,000

Noise Measurements And Fan Speed

All of our measurements are taken in a semi-anechoic chamber at an ambient temperature of 22° C from a distance of 50 cm (19.7 inches), with the microphone perpendicular to the middle fan of the Radeon HD 7990. As always, we report noise levels in dB(A) to account for the human ear’s idiosyncrasies as much as possible.

These tests employ the same calibrated setup used for our PC audio testing, since our studio microphone enables more precise measurements at frequencies above 8 kHz than a sound-level measuring device. Why go to all of that extra effort? Because sound pressure level doesn’t tell the whole story. Although we actually like the acoustics of the Radeon HD 7990’s triple-fan cooler a little more than GeForce GTX 690’s single-fan solution, we also have to live with the fact that, this time around, fan noise isn’t what you’re most likely to hear while you game. As mentioned earlier on, variable loads cause the card’s ceramic capacitors and PCB to vibrate, resulting in a whining sound that grates on your ears.

The company says it actually did quite a bit to minimize this, and you can further help by enabling v-sync to limit frame rates. This brings us back to our analysis and the fact that subjective impressions are a lot different than what an SPL meter would have reported. Don’t worry—we have video to make all of this clearer.

Temperatures, Fan Curves, and Sound Levels

Our first point of interest is comparing the Radeon HD 7990’s maximum temperature to GeForce GTX 690. Both cards are taxed using a GPGPU-oriented application that generates a continuous 100% load. While Nvidia’s dual-GPU board runs at a constant 914.5 MHz, unable to accelerate its core clock any higher, the Radeon HD 7990’s frequency oscillates between 950 and 1000 MHz even after ten minutes, though it tends to trend closer to the base clock rate.

As we can see, the Radeon HD 7990 runs slightly cooler. But how do those temperatures correspond to fan speed?

Unlike the GeForce GTX 690, which sports a center-mounted axial fan using large blades set at a rather sharp angle, AMD’s Radeon HD 7990 is equipped with three axial fans, each of which employing blades that are more curved and set at a shallower angle. This paves the way for lower noise levels and temperatures, even though the trio of blowers rotate faster, too.

AMD’s fan curve is less granular than Nvidia’s, though it’s also generally more conservative. The 7990’s fans spin slower at temperatures under 60°C. In theory, this could yield very low noise output at idle or when the card encounters a moderate load. That’d be quite a coup for AMD, which struggled with noise in the past, but appears to have a real winner in its Radeon HD 7990. Unfortunately, though, more taxing applications trigger the whining issue that creates more noise than the fans.

What AMD refers to as capacitor and PCB vibration ends up costing the Radeon HD 7990 its theoretical advantage. It’d be great to see AMD fix this and really redefine what it means to sell a flagship dual-GPU card that barely makes a whisper.

This takes us to our next question: How much of the noise is actually generated by the fans themselves?

  • blackmagnum
    If I had 1,000 dollars... I would buy a Titan. Its power efficiency, drivers and uber-chip goodness is unmatched.
    Reply
  • whyso
    Power usage?

    Thats some nice gains from the prototype driver.
    Reply
  • ilysaml
    Nice article!! Unbeatable performance out of the box.
    Reply
  • 17seconds
    Sort of seems like a mess to me. The game bundle is nice.
    Reply
  • timw03878
    Here's an idea. Take away the 8 games at 40 bucks a piece and deduct that from the insane 1000 price tag.
    Reply
  • donquad2001
    this test was 99% useless to the average gamer,Test the card at 1900x1080 like most of us use to get a real ideal of what its like,only your unigine benchmarks helped the average gamer,who cares what any card can do at a resolution we cant use anyway?
    Reply
  • cangelini
    whysoPower usage?Thats some nice gains from the prototype driver.Power is the one thing I didn't have time for. We already know the 7990 is a 375 W card, while GTX 690 is a 300 W card, though. We also know AMD has Zero Core, which is going to shave off power at idle with one GPU shut off. I'm not expecting any surprises on power that those specs and technologies don't already insinuate.
    Reply
  • ASHISH65
    nice article! here comes the Competitor of gtx 690!
    Reply
  • cangelini
    donquad2001this test was 99% useless to the average gamer,Test the card at 1900x1080 like most of us use to get a real ideal of what its like,only your unigine benchmarks helped the average gamer,who cares what any card can do at a resolution we cant use anyway?If you're looking to game at 1920x1080, I can save you a ton of money by recommending something less than half as expensive. This card is for folks playing at 2560 *at least.* Next time, I'm looking to get FCAT running on a 7680x1440 array ;)
    Reply
  • hero1
    Nice article. I was hopping that they would have addressed the whining but they haven't and that's a shame. Performance wise it can be matched by GTX 680 SLI and GTX 690 without the huge time variance and runt frames. Let's hope they fix their whining issue and FPS without forcing users to turn on V-sync. For now I know where my money is going consider that I have dealt with AMD before:XFX and Sapphire and didn't like the results (whining, artifacts, XF stops working etc). Sorry but I gave the red team a try and I will stick with Nvidia until AMD can prove that they have fixed their issues.
    Reply