RAID 1.5 With IDE: Added Value Or Eyewash?
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Test Setup
| Test System | |
|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Athlon XP 2200+ |
| Motherboard | DFI LANParty KT400AVIA KT400A ChipsetBIOS : May 6, 2003 |
| RAM | 256 MB DDR333/PC2700, CL2 Corsair Micro |
| Controller & Hard Drives | VIA VT8235 UltraATA/133HighPoint HPT372N On-BoardBIOS 2.3422x Western Digital WD2000BB |
| Display Adapter | nVIDIA GeForce3 Ti4200, 64 MB |
| Network Card | 3COM 905TX PCI 100 MBit |
| Operating System | Windows 2000 Professional5.00.2195, Service Pack 3 |
| Benchmarks and Tests | |
| Performance Measurements | HD Tach 2.61, c’t h2benchw |
| I/O performance | Intel IOMeter |
| Drivers and Settings | |
| Graphics Driver | NVIDIA Reference Driver 41.09 |
| Drivers | Intel Application Accelerator 2.3 |
| DirectX Version | 9.0 |
| Resolution | 1024 x 768, 16 Bit, 85 Hz refresh |
Owing to time restraints, we limited the capacity of the RAID array to 25 GB. Tests on total capacities of up to 400 GB would have taken much longer and would not have produced a different result. All the low-level measurements (IOMeter, HDTach) are only run without partitions anyway and refer to the total capacity of the RAID array.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Test Setup
Prev Page RAID 1.5 From HighPoint: Striping With Parity Data Next Page Benchmark Results
Patrick Schmid was the editor-in-chief for Tom's Hardware from 2005 to 2006. He wrote numerous articles on a wide range of hardware topics, including storage, CPUs, and system builds.
-
lifeisstudy So RAID 1.5 won't work because the heads of the disk still need to move to the next data block to read... If you skip blocks, you still have to move past them.Reply
What about RAID 1.5 with Solid State disks. You have nothing to move, yet you can double your read speed with mirroring. Sounds perfect for server caches.