Today’s tested motherboards offer some of the best features we’ve seen, which should come as no surprise, since many of those features have only recently been introduced. Yet, features aren’t the primary motivation behind the design of these parts.
Instead, we find dual-CPU power connectors on each board that are designed to provide the higher amperage extreme overclockers need to reach CPU limits at extreme voltage levels. Liquid nitrogen is only typical at the competition levels these motherboards were designed to tolerate.
While performance and air-cooled overclock results were a dead-heat for all three boards, MSI’s Big Bang-XPower led in efficiency. If extreme overclockers aren’t impressed by that feat of engineering, then they probably won’t be too impressed by the fact that the board isn’t able to effectively support high-performance SLI or CrossFire configurations in excess of two cards. Though it has six x16-length expansion cards, going even to three cards drops all three slots to x8 mode.
Gigabyte’s X58A-UD9 might be a better choice for overclocking competitions where 3D performance is important, as its seven x16-length slots support up to four-way CrossFireX and SLI configurations at 16 lanes per card. However, buyers do pay for those extra PCIe 2.0 lanes, as the X58A-UD9 costs over twice as much as MSI’s Big Bang-XPower and nearly twice as much as Asus’ Rampage III Extreme. Buyers who want to use this in a PC continue paying for those extra PCIe pathways, as the extended size of the X58A-UD9 requires a 10-slot case to hold four high-end graphics cards.
Four perfectly placed and split slots put Asus’ Rampage III Extreme right in the middle of the PCIe-vs.-price battle. Two-way solutions get the full 16 lanes per card, while the eight-pathway handicap in three- and four-way graphics configurations still beats MSI’s strange eight-four-eight configuration by a wide margin. This board is also designed for overclockers, and that’s where it shines.
The idea of keeping around an extra PC, even a notebook, to access the Rampage III Extreme’s overclocking features at a low level might sound cumbersome, but it works so well that many competitive tuners will likely be drawn to this solution for its convenience. Anyone who still finds the idea a little far fetched might instead be happy with the board’s smart phone interface, something most people carry with them all the time anyway. Builders who already own an OC Station module are also welcome to use it with the Rampage III Extreme, though the fact that it’s not included with this product detracts from the added value of its interface.
The Rampage III Extreme doesn’t have the PCIe multiplication of Gigabyte’s X58A-UD9, but it at least supports four graphics cards at lower cost. Gamers will be happy to see that it fits into a standard case, while overclockers will be thrilled with its added features. That combination makes the Rampage III Extreme a winner in our opinion.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
No EVGA SR-2? :(Reply
Ok, Hold on. Three Flagship LGA 1366 Boards and no overclocked power consumption results? These boards are obviously made for overclocking and those results would be very interesting to see.
A good 250$ X58 board is enough for most people.Reply
9498281 said:No EVGA SR-2? :(
The EVGA Classified SR-2 is based on the Intel 5520 chipset and uses Xeons, so it's not an X58 board technically speaking which is why it doesn't qualify. ;)
If I could spend that much on a motherboard I'd have chosen the Rampage III Extreme, not only does it have good features it also has the best colour scheme. ^^
Does anyone know why I try to submit a comment it doesn't show up, and I have to use the forums instead to post a comment instead?
I want more.Reply
I am totally impressed by ASUS they always come up with best solution in every category, but the price is a killer for me :(Reply
IMO, the only interesting part about motherboard reviews is the overclocking and power consumption portion.Reply
Nice article..I have only catch: Of all the mobos tested, Quad SLI is not possible on the ASUS R3E, courtesy of nVIDIA's driversReply
Whats the point when Intel will come out with new processors with different sockets next year?Reply
avatar_raqNice article..I have only catch: Of all the mobos tested, Quad SLI is not possible on the ASUS R3E, courtesy of nVIDIA's drivershttp://www.guru3d.com/news/quad-sl -possible/Awesome, thanks. Manufacturers don't actually discuss this stuff.Reply
dragonfang18Whats the point when Intel will come out with new processors with different sockets next year?That's what people like you were saying months before LGA 1156 was released. We see which direction that went.
That's what people like you were saying months before LGA 1156 was released. We see which direction that went.
Yeah... they are changing 1366 to some socket R... Well... At least I can look forward to these motherboards going down in price by next year when they go to Socket R's for performance than 1366's. I guess ill be happy with 1366's. Hopefully they go down by at least $100.