Page 1:Did You Know Mobile Haswell Doesn't Support 1.5 V DDR3?
Page 2:Ripjaws DDR3-1866 Low Voltage
Page 3:Ripjaws DDR3-1600 Low Voltage
Page 4:G.Skill Standard DDR3-1333
Page 5:Test Hardware And Software Configurations
Page 6:Results: SiSoftware Sandra
Page 7:Results: 3DMark
Page 8:Results: 3D Games
Page 9:Results: Adobe Creative Suite
Page 10:Results: File Compression
Page 11:Power, Efficiency, And Final Thoughts
When it comes to memory, most of our focus is on the desktop and its replaceable CPUs. The mobile side typically moves slower. But Intel's Haswell architecture imposes interesting changes, and we saw fit to test SO-DIMMs down at their new 1.35 V ceiling.
A straightforward interpretation of the name “Joint Electron Device Engineering Council” tells us a lot about why memory standards improve so slowly. As a multi-member council of memory manufacturing and electronics engineering companies, the standards it sets are defined by ease of adoption. True innovation by one of its members is likely to remain non-standard for months or years as everyone else plays catch-up. Even after a newer standard like DDR3-1600 CAS 9 is finally adopted, most manufacturers revert to older settings, such as DDR3-1600 CAS 11, in order to maintain the highest level of compatibility with previous-generation components.
Of course, this doesn't seem to stifle the enthusiast market. Intel's XMP feature followed Nvidia’s EPP technology to add overclocking profiles on top of the JEDEC-specified table of SPD values. Unfortunately, XMP isn't prolific. Notebooks and tier-one desktops typically don't support the feature, so the potential of high-performance RAM is typically ignored by those machines.
While OEM systems (like the Erazer X700 we just reviewed) continue to restrict RAM selection to SPD settings, Intel’s Haswell architecture more forcefully pushes platform vendors to add JEDEC’s latest standards to their firmware. No doubt, that's largely related to the fact that Intel's mobile Haswell-based CPUs don't support 1.5 V memory.
For enthusiasts upgrading today, this means new systems finally support the rather old DDR3-1866 CAS 10 and DDR3-1600 CAS 9 ratings. In talking to the folks at G.Skill, we agreed that even enthusiasts might not be aware of the changes imposed by Haswell. So, the company sent over some of its low-voltage, high-performance SO-DIMM kits to let us quantify the impact for ourselves.
|G.Skill DDR3 16 GB SO-DIMM Specifications|
|G.Skill Standard Series|
G.Skill gave us a look a three kits of two 8 GB SO-DIMM modules from basic DDR3-1333 to enhanced DDR3-1866. The most common memory we've run across is DDR3-1600 CAS 11, but we didn’t have any 16 GB kits to compare. Previously, however, we've found similar performance between DDR3-1333 CAS 9 and DDR3-1600 CAS 11, so we’ll soldier on with the parts from G.Skill's care package.
We noticed that the company recently announced a DDR3-2133 Ripjaws SO-DIMM kit, but that it tops out at 8 GB (two 4 GB modules). Hopefully it goes to market with a larger 16 GB version in the future.
- Did You Know Mobile Haswell Doesn't Support 1.5 V DDR3?
- Ripjaws DDR3-1866 Low Voltage
- Ripjaws DDR3-1600 Low Voltage
- G.Skill Standard DDR3-1333
- Test Hardware And Software Configurations
- Results: SiSoftware Sandra
- Results: 3DMark
- Results: 3D Games
- Results: Adobe Creative Suite
- Results: File Compression
- Power, Efficiency, And Final Thoughts