Page 1:The SSD DC S3700: Meet Intel's Flagship Enterprise SSD
Page 2:Inside Intel's SSD DC S3700
Page 3:Performance Consistency
Page 4:Test Setup, Benchmarks, And Methodology
Page 5:Results: 4 KB Random Performance And Latency
Page 6:Results: Enterprise Workload Performance
Page 7:Results: Sequential Performance
Page 8:Results: Enterprise Video Streaming Performance
Page 9:Power Consumption
Page 10:Intel's SSD DC S3700 Redefines The Way We Look At Performance
With the recent announcement of the SSD DC S3700, Intel is firmly targeting enterprise customers with something not normally seen on spec sheets: performance consistency. Will their latest offering live up to expectations, or fall short? Lets find out.
Intel took a long and winding road to get to its SSD DC S3700. When the company launched its X25-E almost four years ago (oh yeah, we were there: Intel’s X25-E SSD Walks All Over The Competition), it outperformed pretty much everything on the market. A home-grown 3 Gb/s controller, 50 nm SLC NAND, unprecedented write endurance, and amazingly consistent performance were all cutting-edge at the time. To this day, the X25-E remains one of our favorite enterprise drives.
Available capacities were small, though, and the drive was extremely expensive throughout its life. Of course, that didn't matter to many of the companies that bought X25-Es, since performance and reliability compared to the competition were outstanding. That advantage was attributable to the fact that Intel not only wrote its own custom firmware, but also designed the controller itself.
The SSD 710's controller: We've seen that one before!
From that point on, though, Intel's storage team didn't come up with anything nearly as groundbreaking. On the NAND side, the company abruptly switched from SLC to HET-MLC in its enterprise-oriented drives. The first X25-E successor, SSD 710, was promising, but suffered a few major flaws. Its controller was simply a revised version of the 10-channel design the company had used for years.
Although its performance was close to that achieved by the venerable X25-E, the SSD 710 surfaced at a time when 6 Gb/s drives were the norm, so its results came across fairly underwhelming. It simply didn't have any other controller options to fall back on. Intel chose to partner with Marvell and then SandForce for its 6 Gb/s client-oriented SSDs. But once it leaned on those other vendors, no amount of firmware tweaking was enough to distinguish its product from other companies using the same ASICs.
And while the SSD 710's HET-MLC flash offered a good compromise between performance, capacity, and endurance, the NAND technology was too expensive. As a result, Intel's enterprise follow-up didn't really differentiate itself in a segment that had become increasingly competitive. The company needed to start over, go back, and do what it does best: innovate.
Meet The SSD DC S3700
It's amazing how much can change in one year. The introduction of Intel's SSD DC S3700 appears to right much of what was wrong with the SSD 710. Equipped with a new eight-channel controller of its own design and mature 25 nm HET-MLC NAND, the company has a much more compelling enterprise-oriented offering, at least on paper.
The SSD DC S3700 is available at four capacity points in a 2.5" form factor (100, 200, 400, and 800 GB), and two capacity points in a 1.8" design (200 and 400 GB). We'd expect 2.5" drives, but the 1.8" offerings are more of a surprise. We've seen vendors increasingly shy away from the smaller form factor. However, Intel claims there is a growing demand for them in the blade and micro-server markets.
|Intel SSD DC S3700 Series|
|User Capacity||100 GB||200 GB||400 GB||800 GB|
|Interface||2.5" 6 Gb/s SATA||2.5"/1.8" 6 Gb/s SATA||2.5" 6 Gb/s SATA|
|Sequential Read||500 MB/s|
|Sequential Write||200 MB/s||365 MB/s||460 MB/s||460 MB/s|
|4K Random Read||75,000 IOPS|
|4K Random Write||19,000 IOPS||32,000/29,000 IOPS||36,000 IOPS||36,000 IOPS|
|Power Consumption (+5 V Active)||2.8 W||4.2 W||5.2 W||5.8 W|
|Power Consumption (+5 V Idle)||0.6 W|
|Write Endurance||1.83 PB||3.65 PB||7.3 PB||14.6 PB|
Although those vendor-supplied specifications aren't aggressive enough to knock Samsung's client-oriented 840 Pro from its perch, they do represent a significant improvement over the SSD 710. The SSD DC S3700 is expected to be 2x faster than its predecessor in random read operations, and 15x quicker in random writes. Sequential performance should also be more than twice as fast.
Those specs won't bowl over anyone current with SSD technology. More attention-grabbing was the pricing. When Intel introduced the SSD 710, it wanted something like $7/GB. Even the PCI Express-based SSD 910 launched a few months ago and equipped with the same 25 nm HET-MLC sells for ~$5.5/GB.
In contrast, the 2.5" SSD DC S3700 at 100, 200, 400, and 800 GB is priced at $235, $470, $940, and $1880, respectively. The 1.8" models are expected to command a roughly $25 premium at each capacity point. But that's only $2.35/GB. So, in the span of a year, what you pay per gigabyte of capacity dropped nearly 65%. Even though Intel is still asking almost two times what you'd spend on an 840 Pro, the SSD DC S3700 incorporates enterprise-oriented functionality you won't find anywhere else.
- The SSD DC S3700: Meet Intel's Flagship Enterprise SSD
- Inside Intel's SSD DC S3700
- Performance Consistency
- Test Setup, Benchmarks, And Methodology
- Results: 4 KB Random Performance And Latency
- Results: Enterprise Workload Performance
- Results: Sequential Performance
- Results: Enterprise Video Streaming Performance
- Power Consumption
- Intel's SSD DC S3700 Redefines The Way We Look At Performance