Zotac RTX 3080 Ti Amp Holo Review: Too Much by Half

Attractive, but seriously expensive

Zotac RTX 3080 Ti Amp Holo
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Zotac’s tricked-out RTX 3080 Ti Amp Holo has a capable cooler and lots of RGB. But its price puts it above a 3090, while its performance barely edges above a 3080 TI Founders Edition. And of course, it’s sold out everywhere anyway.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    + Good cooling

  • +

    + Lots of RGB bling

  • +

    + Plenty fast

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    More expensive than a 3090

  • -

    Sold out everywhere

  • -

    Negligible factory overclock

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3080 Ti launch isn't exactly a high point for the RTX 30-series Ampere architecture cards, but the Zotac RTX 3080 Ti Amp Holo almost makes the Founders Edition look reasonable. Yes, the 3080 Ti is nearly as fast as the RTX 3090 and theoretically costs $300 less, only with half the memory. That's almost good enough to put it on our list of the best graphics cards. And it outperforms most of the competition, ranking second overall in our GPU benchmarks hierarchy. The problem is that it's only about 10% faster than the RTX 3080, but with a base price that's over 70% higher.

It's a classic case of diminishing returns, coupled with a money grab on the part of Nvidia—because no one is actually able to buy an RTX 3080 for $700, but Nvidia would be under contract to sell the GPUs to its partners at lower prices. The significantly higher MSRP on the 3080 Ti means more money goes into Nvidia's pot, instead of into the hands of the AIB (add-in board) partners and retailers. Zotac comes in with the RTX 3080 Ti Amp Holo, looks at Nvidia's raise to $1,200 and laughs as it bumps the asking price up to $1,800—or at least, that's the list price at Newegg. It's simply too much, surpassing even the RTX 3090 in pricing—and it's still sold out. 

Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • baha_timimi
    So.
    Is 95 to 98 C is normal for the VRAM ?
    Reply
  • asuchemist
    Looks like the specs graph has the AMP listed as the FE.
    Reply
  • Joseph_138
    If they're going to build a card that is more expensive than a 3090, then it should at least outperform a 3090. For .2 frames over a stock 3080 Ti, it's not worth the money. You can pick up .2 frames yourself using MSI Afterburner on a stock 3080 Ti, with no money spent. JayzTwoCents did a brief overview of the EVGA FTW3 card that actually outperformed a 3090 in some games, and is about $170 LESS than a 3090.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    baha_timimi said:
    So.
    Is 95 to 98 C is normal for the VRAM ?
    For GDDR6X, hitting peak temperatures of more than 100C is quite common. Spec lists 105C as the max, but I don't know what that measures compared to what the GPUs report. Anyway, if a bunch of other cards hit 102-104C max while gaming, and 110C while mining, then a card that only hits 96C gaming and 102C mining is indeed better.
    asuchemist said:
    Looks like the specs graph has the AMP listed as the FE.
    Fixed, thanks.
    Reply
  • GoldRidley
    It's actually so much worse than the review lets on; at least for anyone hoping to overlock this. The card is advertised as having a 10% power boost taking it into the 375w region - this is false. It's totally disabled by the firmware. You can't ever get the numbers advertised for this card without flashing another manufacturer's bios, which is a hell of a risk.
    Reply
  • baha_timimi
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    For GDDR6X, hitting peak temperatures of more than 100C is quite common. Spec lists 105C as the max, but I don't know what that measures compared to what the GPUs report. Anyway, if a bunch of other cards hit 102-104C max while gaming, and 110C while mining, then a card that only hits 96C gaming and 102C mining is indeed better.

    Fixed, thanks.
    Thanks for information
    Reply