Just Buy It: Why Nvidia RTX GPUs Are Worth the Money

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Avram Piltch
Managing Editor: Special Projects

Avram Piltch is Managing Editor: Special Projects. When he's not playing with the latest gadgets at work or putting on VR helmets at trade shows, you'll find him rooting his phone, taking apart his PC, or coding plugins. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram developed many real-world benchmarks, including our laptop battery test.

  • Cryio
    "you won't be able to take advantage of key RTX features like real-time ray tracing"

    You actually can. If your GPU can do DX12, it can do ray tracing. It's just that the option itself will be more heavy on older GPUs than on new GPUs. The same with how tessellation was a heavy effect on HD 5000/GTX 400 compared to really low cost on current Vega 64 or GTX 1080.
    Reply
  • feelinfroggy777
    While I do tend to agree with the philosophy as a whole, this is a very different launch than before. Given this is really a new way to run games, I believe it is wise to see some unbiased performance information.

    While you wont see prices fall below MSRP, after supply catches up in several months, these RTX cards can be had at MSRP. This happens with every launch. When the 1080 was launched prices were sky high for the first few months due to limited capacity and high demand.

    The only real advantage for pricing yo may have is the resell value of your current hardware. Barring another Crypto craze, the 10xx series used cards wont be worth more than they are today. As every day and month passes, the value of those cards will drop. So if you can flip your 1080 or 1080ti for a decent price today, it may be worth taking the risk of selling and preordering a RTX card.

    But for me, I will wait till I see unbiased performance data before dropping 1k+ on a PC component.
    Reply
  • siuwarren
    Not if you just like playing Anime games :)
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Avram, I bet you bought a physix card when they were released. How did that turn out for you? Nobody can enjoy an RTX card until September 20th, so why spend so much on a card that nobody has an apples to apples performance comparison yet? This article is awful and peddles uninformed buying decisions for the consumer
    Reply
  • JimmiG
    TU104 isn't that big a chip, it's the cut-down, mid-range, gaming oriented chip, just like GP104 and GK104 before it. Don't be so eager to throw money at Nvidia and fuel their monopoly, their profit margins are already insane. Wait until the excess stock of Pascal-based cards has been sold off. Around the holidays or Q1 2019, Q2 at the latest, you should be able to buy an RTX card for a more reasonable price.
    Reply
  • Biga101011
    Depends on what the actual rtx performance is. I can with my 1080ti hey 100+ fps in all games at high settings in 1440p. I would not be willing to except lower frame rates to make a game look better, I will always turn down settings to keep my frame rate up.

    Since rtx appears to be all or nothing, if the new cards can not hit 100+ fps at 1440p with rtx there is literally no advantage for me. I won't ever turn it on and sacrifice the performance. So the argument of it having anything over the 1080ti doesn't really apply to me. Stuttering gives me a headache, and all the demos were stuttering like crazy. New games and better optimization may help some, but I don't think I would turn it on anyway until the hardware got more powerful to do raytracing at a high frame rate.

    Maybe the next gen will hit a reasonable frame rate with rtx. If so I will probably buy into it then, because the games look fantastic with it. Despite my disagreement about it being the better card in the long run, I am genuinely excited about the technology.
    Reply
  • GeoffCoope
    Marketing has a way of sounding better than it is, take Magic Leap for instance. Yes they are selling out in many places, maybe the initial batch was very low to make it appear this way. Another batch will come. Where are the independent game benchmarks why was this not shown. The Siggraph demos were OK but not amazing. This is an era where FPS seems more important than eye candy yet all we have so far is eye candy and marketing.

    It is wiser to hold off until they are in the wild and real users and independent reviewers have hands on experience rather than buying blind just because, I find this article a bit reckless to suggest otherwise.
    Reply
  • tooterfishes
    wait for AMD to respond
    Reply
  • timf79
    It would be great to see real benchmarks with games like DOTA 2 (where I doubt an RTX will do better than a Titan XP) and X-Plane (which is single GPU hungry)
    Reply
  • lomaxrobert
    i dont think i have ever read a more poorly thought out reason to buy a new component with no data to back it up, "its just a dont think buy it now approach". myself im getting a bit tired of the power creep from nvidia bleeding gamers dry
    Reply