System Builder Marathon, March 2012: $650 Gaming PC

Making The Most Of Limited Overclocking

With no access to base clock settings, a locked processor multiplier, and memory data rates that top out at 1333 MT/s, we're limited to pushing lower latencies. DRAM voltage settings are available in increments of one-tenth of a volt, from 1.5 V up to 2.2 V. At 1.6 V, our inexpensive kit rated for CAS 9 timings was fully stable at 7-8-7-22 1T. Despite dialing-in and testing the memory, our discussion of tuning is far from over, though. 

I have hundreds of system builds under my belt, and I’ve never witnessed such quirky behavior when changing memory timings as what I saw from Gigabyte’s DualBIOS UEFI. Every attempt to make a latency change was met with a series of rapid beeps, followed by a power-down and restart with the new settings applied. Even going from Auto to Quick, without altering anything, invoked the same behavior.

The cycle looked a lot like the recovery you'd see after a failed overclock, only it was a lot faster, and the settings actually stuck. The platform would boot fine after that until another setting was altered.

The XFX Radeon HD 6950 was fully stable at AMD Overdrive’s maximum available 840 MHz core and 1325 MHz memory frequencies. Despite such modest limits, I stayed consistent with past builds and stuck to AMD's driver rather than exploring the hardware's true ceiling using third-part software. I tend to be conservative with memory clocks, and since there was no way to know the RAM's actual limit, I dialed back to a 1300 MHz memory frequency and retailed the 840 MHz core. This minor 5% core and 4% memory overclock does handicap the current rig some, as December’s Radeon HD 6870 enjoyed a more significant 10% core and 12.4% memory overclock.

  • yukijin
    so now that all the 6950's are deactivated or $289+, is this build invalid? because a 7850 is looking really good right now...
    Reply
  • tristan_b
    What yukijin said.
    Reply
  • whysobluepandabear
    I appreciate what they're doing, but at some points, I can't help but feel like a cheap bitch.

    Making decisions overly measly amounts of money ($10) is just dumb. Work an extra day and just get the hardware you want. Or, don't go to the movies or out to eat for a few weeks.

    To me, there's a certain area, at which being cheap, just rips you off - you'd be better off spending a little more, and getting a much better item.
    Reply
  • How do I win this????
    Reply
  • mortsmi7
    Let me get this straight... you raised the budget $150 "as a result of steep price hikes on mechanical storage", then only spent $85 on a HDD. You really just wanted a more expensive graphics card. You could have taken the $70 processor savings and the $65 under-budget HDD savings and nearly have had a $500 build.
    Reply
  • de5_Roy
    very good read.
    nice to see where core i3's limits lie.
    i wonder if you guys will consider amd's new fx 6200 or fx 8120 for the $1200 build, with 78xx series in cfx.
    Reply
  • serhat359
    if I had $600 for a PC, I would go with i3-21xx, 6870, a better mobo and a better case.
    it is probably the best thing to do
    Reply
  • SpadeM
    whysobluepandabearI appreciate what they're doing, but at some points, I can't help but feel like a cheap bitch. Making decisions overly measly amounts of money ($10) is just dumb. Work an extra day and just get the hardware you want. Or, don't go to the movies or out to eat for a few weeks. To me, there's a certain area, at which being cheap, just rips you off - you'd be better off spending a little more, and getting a much better item.It's not an issues of whether they had the money or not, it's a matter of principle, you set your budget and goals at a certain point and then you make choices. Sure, not everyone will be happy with what they chose but that's what forums are for.

    Anyways, anything a bit over 60fps (on a 60hz monitor) really isn't that bad, i mean you might lack the bragging rights but at the end of the day, it's about gaming and feeling satisfied that you shot enough monsters. To further empathize that having 70 fps constant is not total shit because another GPU can serve you 130 (as if you're going to notice without watching the fps counter) my one suggestion for this SBM would be to introduce a different style of graphs. Below 30fps all the colors of the bars to be grey and over 60 the same thing. This to focus the attention on most relevant (to my opinion) segment. I've seen a lot of ppl chase those fps numbers, buying expensive GPUs only to have them sit in a bad enclosure, sub par motherboard or weak CPU.
    Even in gaming, i believe balance is key.
    Reply
  • confish21
    Great Job! These builds keep me at Tomshardware!

    Only thing 1 thing, you said an I3 was used instead of an I5 on this page...
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/build-gaming-pc-overclock,3159-8.html
    You can check the 600 dec build here...
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i5-overclock-performance-gaming,3097.html
    Pretty sure an I5-2400 was used.
    Reply
  • jerreddredd
    I'm glad they used a i3 2120 for the CPU, but I wish they would have used some of the newer cards like the HD 7950 or the GTX 560 Ti 448. these are roughly the same price. Spending and extra $20 on a PSU was a waste. the EA430D and 380W are the core of the budget build. I would like to see some testing of a few of the less expensive PSU ($50 or less) to see which are junk and which aren't bad.
    Reply