Partnership
  • MSI is the official motherboard sponsor for Overdrive, providing Nehalem and P45 platforms for the Championship.
  • HyperX DDR3 modules are specifically engineered and designed to meet the rigorous requirements of PC enthusiasts.HyperX modules rated at DDR3-2000+are used in the Overdrive Championship
  • Samsung Hard Drives and Optical Drives - The Center of Innovation
  • 1,000 W modular 80plus high-efficiency EVEREST 1010 power supplies used for the Overdrive Championship.
  • Logitech's G11 gaming keyboard offers illuminated keys and 18 configurable multi-purpose keys plus a USB hub. The G5 Laser Mouse allows adjustable weight and up to 2000 dpi sensitivity for maximum precision.
Shop for All
GT5674 Desktop GT5674 Desktop

Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left

Eee Box Desktop Eee Box Desktop $349.99
Edge Z15 Desktop - Customizable Edge Z15 Desktop - Customizable $1499.00
iMac 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 20' Desktop iMac 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 20"... $1249.99
TouchSmart IQ504 Desktop TouchSmart IQ504 Desktop $1299.99

See More Products...

Topics:

CPU and Cooler

1:10 AM - April 16, 2008 by Thomas Soderstrom and Shelton Romhanyi
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: cpu, graphic, game
Topics: Build Your Own, Overclocking

Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

CPU and Cooler

CPU: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160

Back in the 1990’s Intel put huge resources into creating its Pentium brand around its fifth-generation processors, using it even for sixth and seventh-generation architectures. The firm’s later Celeron brand came to represent processors with reduced cache and bus speeds compared to the Pentium parts on which these were based. Welcome to the new Celeron Core 2 series of processors, which, just to add confusion to the market, gets the Pentium name.

intel dual core e2160

Based on the same Allendale core as Intel’s “budget” Core 2 Duo E6320, the “cheaper than a budget part” E2160 is further handicapped with reduced cache and a slower FSB. Compared to its 1.86 GHz, FSB-1066, 4 MB Cache sibling, the E2160 runs at 1.80 GHz using FSB-800 and has only 1MB of cache.

The reduction in cache could have a profound effect on games, but the efficiencies of Intel’s Core 2 architecture are impossible to ignore. Yet the combination of low clock speed and small cache size could almost push us towards a competing part if not for the legendary overclocking capabilities of Intel’s Core 2 architecture.

CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper TX2

The System Builder Marathon team had noted the excellent cooling-per-dollar of the Cooler Master Hyper TX2 long before it became the star of our CPU Cooler Comparison.

cooler master tx2

Had our focus not been on overclocking, we might have instead spent the money on a better processor, but we expect that the performance gained from overclocking will far exceed that of the “next model up” CPU.


Talkback
romulus47plus1 04/16/2008 12:41 PM
Hide
-0+
romulus47plus1

Somehow I think this is a better PC than the 1000$ one.

lunyone 04/16/2008 12:54 PM
Hide
-0+
lunyone

Is it me or was their first price list have the Phenom 9500 and when I looked at the next page they were mentioning the e2160 w/DS3L? I'd much prefer this setup over the $1k that they listed last month. I mean, I could build a $1k rig that would compete with their $1.5k or better system.

Coolio_Alert 04/16/2008 2:05 AM
Hide
-0+
Coolio_Alert

Looks cool, still better then my 3 year old $300 one but that will be changing by the summer: Armor Case, Antec 650w, Maximus Formula, E8400, BFG 8800GTS OC, 2 GB Dominator RAM, 500gb 7200.11 (Seagate Barracuda), 2 Lightscribes. Gonna run XP Home (32-bit) and no overclocking for a little bit until its needed or I feel more confident. I CAN'T WAIT!!! :D

radguy 04/16/2008 2:16 AM
Hide
-0+
radguy

I asked for another 500 dollar build after the last sbm. This overclocked might throw up some really interesting results. Just make sure we have some real gaming benchmarks this time please. Also I really like what you guys picked.

zenmaster 04/16/2008 2:28 AM
Hide
-0+
zenmaster

Excellent Shopping.
Truly Impressive build.

Gotta love those falling GPU prices.

TechnologyCoordinator 04/16/2008 2:47 AM
Hide
-0+
TechnologyCoordinator

I like the article, but I'm consused by the price list on the first page, what does it reference!?!? I'd love to see the price list of the $500 build on the first page.

Eric Tardes 04/16/2008 2:48 AM
Hide
-0+
Eric Tardes

Nice roundup.
Very nice configuration for 500 bucks.

Curious about the review,and overclocking results :).

The price on the first page is from previous "System builder marathon - Low cost system", so don't worry about the first page, it's there just for the reference!

MisterChef 04/16/2008 2:51 AM
Hide
-0+
MisterChef

Quote :a few swore by “Absurdly Cheap” components that our experience has proven are likely to fail within the first few months of use


Yeah, I was one of those "absurdly cheap" bastards. :) But this $500 build has indeed got my interest. I eagarly await testing results.

woodstock827 04/16/2008 3:03 AM
Hide
-0+
woodstock827

there seems to be come inconsistencies in the component list on first page and the rest of the article.. the obvious ones are the CPU (AMD vs Intel?) and the Graphics card (AMD vs nVidia). It'd be great if that's fixed. ;)

woodstock827 04/16/2008 3:06 AM
Hide
-0+
woodstock827

o.. wait.. nvm.. I got confused.. the front page is for the low-cost system a month back? a bit confusing there..

blader15sk8 04/16/2008 3:09 AM
Hide
-0+
blader15sk8

A very similar build to my $~650 build, except I ended up buying a 9600GT and an Antec 900 with a 560W PSU which is where my premium in price comes in. Great build and I after the benches I may recommend it to a few friends.

Wild9 04/16/2008 3:10 AM
Hide
-0+
Wild9

If price is the prime consideration here then I think you could save a few pennies by going AMD. The one thing I hate about these latest systems is having to use DDR II memory, so unlike AMD S939 you can't save money by using existing memory you may have lying around. Aside from that I can't find a bad part..they're all branded and no corners have been cut with the PSU or memory. Historically those things are usually the one's that can cause the most grief.

Anonymous 04/16/2008 3:22 AM
Hide
-0+

Motherboard Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L $66.99

CPU Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 OEM $234.99 or Intel Core 2 Duo E2220 $91.99

RAM: Mushkin DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 1.9v $31.99 after MIR

Case hec 6K28BB8F /w 585W PSU $54.99

HD WD Caviar 320GB $69.99

Optical Drive PHILIPS SPD2513BM/17 (DVD,CD Burner) $24.99

Graphics Card XFX 8800GS $99 after MIR or Sapphire HD3870 $149.99 after MIR

HSF Zerotherm BTF92 $32.99 after MIR $149.99 after MIR

Quad setup: 619.92(88GS) after rebates, $669.92(3870) after rebates
Duo setup: 476.92(88GS) after rebates, $526.92(3870) after rebates

Gota LOVE newegg's low prices.

lightfoot__ 04/16/2008 3:31 AM
Hide
-0+
lightfoot__

This is pretty much my setup only I did the 9600gt for $119 after mail in rebate. I moved over an x-fi from my last system and I definitely found my pc better then their $1k build. I even have a 600watt ultra PSU that was 8$ after rebate. My whole system (including vista, excluding monitor) was about $385. GeminII heatsink was free after rebate and vista was free from playing club live games! Great job on part selection! This baby will fly with an oc.

It needs an oc too because I scored 6800 in 3dmark06 until I overclocked the cpu to 3.0 then got 9700 marks, oc'ed video card and cpu @3.16 and got 11050 3dmark06 pts! Beat that tom's!

night_wolf_in 04/16/2008 3:34 AM
Hide
-0+
night_wolf_in

lunyone wrote :

Is it me or was their first price list have the Phenom 9500 and when I looked at the next page they were mentioning the e2160 w/DS3L? I'd much prefer this setup over the $1k that they listed last month. I mean, I could build a $1k rig that would compete with their $1.5k or better system.




yeah, the table on first page is not the right one. they have to fix it

jtt283 04/16/2008 4:07 AM
Hide
-0+
jtt283

I could see that the table was from a previous article, but I would like to have seen an identical table for the current build, or a column added for direct comparison.
I like this one though, and will look forward to the next piece concerning performance.

night_wolf_in 04/16/2008 4:13 AM
Hide
-0+
night_wolf_in

^yeap. n i loved this system. it shows a true sub 500$ system

animehair 04/16/2008 4:26 AM
Hide
-0+
animehair

Interesting...ive been doing my own research the last several weeks for a new sub 500$ build...I picked out the same mobo, cpu, and hard drive. I look forward to seeing some good benchmark results.

lunyone 04/16/2008 4:51 AM
Hide
-0+
lunyone

This build is much smarter than the one last month. I'm going to see how well they actually test this setup. It'll only be as good as the GPU that they use, so it'll do well, but not as good as the 3870 rig last month.

zenmaster 04/16/2008 5:26 AM
Hide
-0+
zenmaster

animehair wrote :

Interesting...ive been doing my own research the last several weeks for a new sub 500$ build...I picked out the same mobo, cpu, and hard drive. I look forward to seeing some good benchmark results.




And I happen to have that exact case in my office awaiting an upcoming build.
I actually got the combo for an absurd price of $35!


Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.