Stalker: Clear Sky - Is Your System Ready?

Test--The Benefit Of Changing Range Of View

We conducted this test with maximum graphics quality (extended dynamic illumination of objects) with DirectX 10. Anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering were deactivated and the range of view was set to maximum. The test system consisted of a Core 2 Duo E6750 at its standard frequency of 2.66 GHz, 4 GB of memory, and a GeForce 8800 GTS 512. The test resolution was 1920x1200 pixels.

In total, you can set the range of view in 12 steps. In the pictures, you can see the setting of the slide bar, which you usually find in the extended graphics menu. In order to make it easier to see the setting, we put a number next to it: 12 is the maximum range of view, 1 is the minimum.

Here are all 12 ranges of view of Stalker Clear Sky.

You can hardly see any difference between level 8 and 12, where the frame rate stays at 24 fps. Beginning with level 8 the frame rate goes up by one and reaches 25 fps, but the illumination clouds of the anomaly are hardly visible. At level 4 or less, the number of objects in the background decreases and it’s strange that the frame rate actually drops down to 22 or 23 fps. A significant increase in performance only comes from the minimal range of view, with the frame rate shooting up to 27 fps at setting 1.

Playing with the settings doesn’t make sense here, because the gain is simply too small. If you want to see all the details, you can go back from level 12 to 8, which results in a gain of only 1 fps at maximum graphic quality. You would be better off staying at the maximum range of view and change the graphics or illumination mode; the potential for improvement there is a lot higher.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
62 comments
    Your comment
  • V3ctor
    Page 7 is not available... It gives an error, as if the page doesn't exist.
    2
  • magicandy
    Aside from the numerous pages that don't work, was a 24-page analysis of STALKER, a fairly mediocre shooter, really necessary? Is a 24-page analysis of any game necessary? Sigh anything to please devs and grab ad dollars -_-
    -6
  • pogsnet
    Now crysis is obsolete =p
    0
  • haplo602
    hmm ... I loled when I saw the graphics error in the water tests. the camo-net disappeared everywhere it obscured water in all modes other than static. but you get a nice looking water effect :-)

    I was wondering if I can get this game to run on reasonable terms on a HD4670 or HD3850. Based on the HD3870 results, it looks like it would be playable ...
    0
  • cangelini
    V3ctorPage 7 is not available... It gives an error, as if the page doesn't exist.


    Not sure what you're seeing (or not, in this case), but everything is working over here. Any more detail?
    0
  • randomizer
    magicandySigh anything to please devs and grab ad dollars -_-
    Dude, the GSC can't even afford to hire a dozen half-decent developers, let alone pay for ads.
    1
  • blackwidow_rsa
    I had 'page not found' errors too, but they seem fixed now
    0
  • randomizer
    No page errors here.
    -1
  • ravenware
    Nice article, I liked the quality comparisons a lot
    3
  • xx12amanxx
    I like the article ive been playing this on a 4870 for about a week now and absolutly love it!
    1
  • dimaf1985
    magicandyAside from the numerous pages that don't work, was a 24-page analysis of STALKER, a fairly mediocre shooter, really necessary? Is a 24-page analysis of any game necessary? Sigh anything to please devs and grab ad dollars -_-


    A fairly mediocre shooter? Youre obviously an idiot.

    The real question here is what was the point of the first 9 pages? Is this a review on a graphics analysis article? C'mon on, Tom's, get it together.

    Other than the first 9 pages, nice article. Very in-depth.
    5
  • Luscious
    No 4870x2 in that roundup? What about some CF/SLI numbers?
    0
  • radnor
    Well, i found it a decent review. I liked how they categorized the cards and presented the game. This review might not ring you bells but it is not too bad.

    Not that I'm going to buy this game atm. Its too hilarious to see the stock market now. Oh, well :)
    0
  • V3ctor
    cangelini

    It posted as a bad link... as if i got a link (for example 1 year ago, and now doesn't work)... But it's fine now... never mind :)

    Good review... 24 pages is a lot, u covered a lot of angles... including the graphics cards.
    0
  • Anonymous
    The game is definitely an improvement on the first one - on paper at least.
    The problem is the huge amount of game crashes. I played the game for about 8 hours, progressing all the way to The Garbage level when my crashes started. I was forced to install the latest patch, but that meant I had to start all over again. Although I this time got twice as far, the game still crashes - although now instead of rebooting the PC, it is caught by a built-in bug tracker.
    I am really dissapointed now, cause after one of these crashes, my game is now stuck at the Yantar level - where I'm supposed to meet up with a character, but when you get to the character, he is completely inactive. I've moved backwards and forwards in levels, but I cannot get this dude to react to my presence.

    I suspect I will probably have to restart the game, but I think I am going to abandon - at least untill a newer patch, and then hope the new patch will recognize my current saves.

    Advice: Make regular custom saves - not just quicksaves...
    1
  • mr roboto
    More like is STALKER ready? From what I've heard it's not. Numerous bugs and crashes, but then again the first game was like that so would you expect anything less?
    0
  • modtech
    Patch 1.5.05 is out. The game never crashed or glitched for me and I've gone from start to finish, joined in on 3 different faction wars and explored the crap out of every area. I also finished crysis warhead and that CTDed twice from the start to the end.
    0
  • ahslan
    I dont know if Im convinced on getting this STALKER...I was hugely disappointed with the first one (especially since sooo many people said it was a great game)...
    For me, its the exact opposite of crysis...I didnt get crysis for the longest time because soo many people said it wasnt worth it, but once I took a chance on it, I loved it...now I got warhead which so far has be amazing...
    1
  • modtech
    Warhead is short and shallow. Not a bad game but anyway. If you're talking about Stalker:SOC then you would do well to look at the modding community which really made the game the memorable experience it is to many. (Notably the oblivion lost mod)

    I've played and finished both crysis games. They are in no way comparable to the atmospheric freedom that the stalker games have. You just can't compare them. Change the point of view to multiplayer and things might be different. Otherwise I you comment comes across as poorly thought out and shallow.
    1
  • Yuka
    Very nice review indeed. I missed the 4870X2 and 9800GX2 though, but it was a nice review indeed.

    I liked the "Performance Comparison" at the end the most. That's the most usefull piece of info you guys can give the reader: easy to digest pointers and info for overall game experience. Two thumbs up for that =)

    Esop!
    1