Although their attach rates are still surprisingly low, SSDs continue to evolve, allowing them to satisfy a growing number of niches. SanDisk's X210, specifically, is aimed at entry-level servers and desktop-replacement notebooks. But given the family's internals (along with extensive validation and tuning), it's really quite appropriate for most roles, except for enterprise-oriented workloads that quickly wear out the MLC flash. Purpose-built drives fare better in those more taxing applications.
Of course, SanDisk acquired SMART Storage Systems, so the company will no doubt create more hardware akin to what we reviewed in SanDisk Optimus Eco SSD: A SAS Interface And Up To 2 TB Of Flash. Really, SanDisk wants to put solid-state storage into everything. With a patent for MLC flash in one hand and a joint fabrication venture with Toshiba in the other, this organization is unlike most of the other players in that it's solely focused on flash and associated technologies.
OEM sales are where the volume happens. But products like the Ultra Plus and Extreme II matter for visibility, even if they compete for attention in the smaller aftermarket sandbox. SanDisk's X210 has one foot in both segments; it's available from select outfits to both end-users and businesses.
Although it's identical in most respects to the Extreme II, SanDisk's X210 is slightly more conservative, trading in bleeding edge specifications and the Extreme branding for firmware carefully cultivated by demanding OEM partners. To them, reliability is more important. They're responsible for supporting the systems sporting X210s after all, and they shoulder the cost of a returned machine if the SSD fails. No wonder SIs often favor tried-and-true parts.
The thing is, few manufacturers are in the business of building OEM drives. Those customers are very price-sensitive. They're also not happy when a firmware bug affects their bottom line.
Even as an enthusiast, some of the same concerns apply. I don't want some dumb issue that should have been caught killing my boot drive. That's why we tend to recommend the SSDs with which we have the best experiences, and not just the ones that tear through benchmarks quickest. I've had dozens of SSDs die on me over the years, so I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea to follow the lead of demanding OEMs when choosing a storage device.
Fortunately, when it comes to the X210, you don't make much of a sacrifice. It's almost as quick as SanDisk's Extreme II and Samsung's 840 Pro in most metrics, and the price tag isn't overly inflated. SanDisk does say it costs more to manufacture the X210, but market volatility typically masks the premium. Expect to pay less than $1/GB. Tack on five-year warranty coverage, along with the fact that there really aren't any competing OEM-derived SSDs in this performance bracket, and there's no denying the X210's attractiveness to serious client and SMB environments. Shoot, CDW sells the 512 GB model for $320. That's a phenomenal price for any high-capacity drive.
- SanDisk's X210 Adds Strict Validation To High Performance
- Test Setup And Benchmarks
- Results: 128 KB Sequential Performance
- Results: 4 KB Random Performance
- Results: Performance Vs. Capacity
- Results: Write Saturation And Over-Provisioning Tests
- Results: Tom's Hardware Storage Bench
- Results: Tom's Hardware Storage Bench, Continued
- Results: PCMark 7 And PCMark Vantage
- Results: File Copy Performance With Robocopy
- Results: Power Consumption
- TRIM Testing: Our Suite Evolves Yet Again
- SanDisk Creates An OEM SSD With Enthusiast Appeal