SCSI Vs. IDE
While IDE adapters can be found on every motherboard for many years, you will have to specially purchase a SCSI adapter in most cases. A few motherboards are available with integrated SCSI-chip however. Those fully featured motherboards are clearly cheaper than a standard motherboard plus a PCI SCSI adapter card, but you can easily exchange the card if you want to upgrade to a faster or better featured one (e.g. multi-channel cards, RAID adapters etc).
In order to keep up compatibility, the principle has never been changed. Two drives can be operated from one IDE channel. One is the 'master' drive, the other will be 'slave'. With the introduction of the ATAPI standard, CD-ROM drives could also be operated from IDE controllers. Therefore a second IDE channel became common, as attaching one hard drive and the CD-ROM would not have left any room for future upgrades.
The SCSI bus is both more complex and more flexible. Every device gets assigned a SCSI-ID number. It can either be set directly on the devices (using jumpers), or the host adapter assigns them. The most important advantage is the amount of supported drives: 8 devices can be in a SCSI chain, with one of the devices being the host adapter. Each end of the SCSI chain has to be 'closed' with a terminator to prevent signal reflexions.
All devices can also be operated externally. Some drives (e.g. Iomega Jaz) can be obtained as external SCSI versions. There are also special SCSI cases available where you can place hard drives, CD drives, streamers or other hardware. Also SCSI scanners are very popular due to the higher bus performance compared to USB or the parallel port.
Thanks to complex controller chips, SCSI is able to access all drives almost simultaneously, which is still not possible with IDE. Decent SCSI-adapters have its own processor and are able to do bus mastering, so that SCSI-bus tranfers don't cost any significant CPU performance.
