Page 1:Is Newer Better?
Page 2:Test Settings
Page 3:Benchmark Results: 3DMark And PCMark
Page 4:Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra
Page 5:Benchmark Results: Crysis
Page 6:Benchmark Results: F1 2010
Page 7:Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Metro 2033
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
Page 10:Benchmark Results: Productivity
Page 11:Power And Heat
Page 12:Combined Performance And Efficiency
Page 13:Value Conclusion
Benchmark Results: Productivity
The Adobe Photoshop filters we use to benchmark are well-optimized to use all four cores of the $1000 and $2000 builds. However, they don't appear to benefit from the higher-priced machine’s Hyper-Threading functionality, which creates an additional four logical cores for improved resource utilization.
Contrary to Photoshop, 3ds Max does appear to benefit from Intel's Hyper-Threading technology. The $2000 machine’s reference speed outperforms the $1000 machine’s overclock, in spite of the cheaper system’s higher clock rate.
WinZip appears poorly optimized for four-core processors (in reality, it only utilizes a single core), which is a phenomena that could help explain why 7-Zip and WinRAR have become more popular among performance enthusiasts.
ABBYY FineReader mimics 3ds Max performance, again rewarding a performance lead the $2000 machine’s logical core increase. This isn’t a 1:1 correlation however, since the $500 machine’s two physical cores still score significantly behind the $1000 build’s four physical cores.
- Is Newer Better?
- Test Settings
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark And PCMark
- Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra
- Benchmark Results: Crysis
- Benchmark Results: F1 2010
- Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2
- Benchmark Results: Metro 2033
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Power And Heat
- Combined Performance And Efficiency
- Value Conclusion