Speaking of, although they look great, the only downside to the fans we used is their static pressure performance, and that’s definitely something you’ll see in the temperature results. AIO radiators typically have a far higher fin density than their open-loop cousins, making static pressure all the more important for good performance.
As a system builder or enthusiast, it’s good to get back to the basics every now and then with an AIO-cooled PC like this. The overall aesthetic goal for this NZXT build was to showcase what you can do with some subtle RGB lighting configured in the correct way, and it’s hard to deny just how clean it looks, even with those stock cables. The amount of lighting software you have to install to control the fans, RAM, and top of the cooler is frustrating, but on the whole we think it’s worth it for the final results.
As for the build process, we didn’t run into many problems. That said, the radiator bracket is a bit finicky to get into position once it’s got both the radiator and the fans installed on either side of it. Additionally, installing the top exhaust fan after the cables were installed was also a bit of a struggle.
We aimed to hit that 1440p 60fps sweet spot with this build, and perhaps unsurprisingly the RTX 2070 Super paired with that Ryzen 5 3600X performs well in that regard. In fact, if you take a quick glance over the gaming benchmarks, you’ll notice this system often outperforms the liquid-cooled “Console Killer” that we built back in April 2019.
That system featured an Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 and an AMD Ryzen 5 2600X. It really does go to show how both of those platforms have matured over the last year, especially in regards to Ryzen / Zen 2’s gaming performance. And yet the more impressive figure is the price difference, as our CPU/GPU combo here is 35% cheaper than what was featured in that liquid-cooled build back then, and that’s without including the waterblocks.
System and Temperature Benchmarks
When it came to temperatures--unsurprisingly compared to our liquid-cooled systems--the Kraken build did register somewhat higher, especially in more-aggressive 3D render based operations. During our consecutive CineBench R15 runs, we saw temps climb as high as 77 C, and with Prime95’s stock blends test the processor hit a whopping 84 degrees. With better performing fans, perhaps EKWB’s new Vardar X3Ms (so as to not sacrifice that RGB element), temperatures would drop.
Aside from temperatures, overall system performance looked good. 203 points in CineBench R15’s single core test is definitely an improvement on the Ryzen 5 2600X found in the Console Killer, and primary SSD drive performance was also solid, although we would say those PCIe 4.0 writes on the 500GB drive leave a lot to be desired compared to the larger-capacity variants.
As always, you could spend more on the graphics card and CPU and get better performance, or spend more on custom cooling and cables and make this system look better. But we’re mostly pleased with the results of this build with standard, sub-pinnacle parts. Gaming performance at 1440p was good. The NZXT case, cooler and fans -- and particularly the LCD display on the Kraken cooler -- helped the system look slick without going the gaudy route. And our total build budget remained at least in the realm of affordability for most serious gamers and enthusiasts.
One easy way to shave down the price here would be to go with a technically slower PCIe 3.0 boot SSD (which should still load your games and levels in roughly the same amount of time) and opt for a hard drive for your bulk storage. And if you’re primarily interested in gaming and basic productivity, dropping the RAM down to 16GB of RAM will also save $100 without affecting your frame rates. But if you decide you want 32GB in a year or two, you may wind up paying more, as RAM prices are on the rise again.
MORE: Best Gaming Desktops
MORE: How To Build A PC
MORE: All PC Builds Content