Battle of the X670E Flagships: Testing MSI, Asus and Gigabyte’s Best

Battle of the X670 Flagships
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

No one loves the fact that motherboard prices keep going up (except probably the motherboard makers themselves). But there’s no denying that flagship boards still pack in the most complete and most interesting collection of features, along with high-end specs in an attempt to draw in those looking for the best of the best to build their new system around. And with AMD’s new Ryzen 7000X3D CPUs arriving with impressive performance, it’s likely that more people will be looking to build rigs based around AMD’s X670E chipset.

So here we’ll be looking at a few flagship AMD boards from Asus, Gigabyte and MSI. Similar to our Z790 flagship roundup on the Intel side, we’ll detail three (of four) flagship motherboards from the B670E platform. We’ll test and discuss the MSI X670E Godlike ($1,299), Asus Crosshair X670E Extreme ($999), and the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Xtreme in detail, and also cover the notably less expensive (but flagship nonetheless) ASRock X670E Taichi ($479.99). All boards offer a premium appearance, overkill power delivery, PCIe 5.0 slots, and M.2 sockets. Are any of these worth the price? Of these, which should you choose?

The biggest difference between these boards is the price. From the sub-$500 Taichi to the nearly $1300 Godlike, there’s a huge gap from least to most expensive. The problem (for the consumer) is that aside from just price, there isn’t a $700 difference between them on any front, including performance. While some VRMs are better, even the worst (and I use that term loosely) easily handles the Ryzen 9 7950X without issue. It comes down to how many and what speed M.2 sockets you desire, if you’re OK with last-gen flagship class audio or your want the latest and greatest, and finally, 40 Gbps USB ports. 

Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • evdjj3j
    I'm surprised MSI uses the name Godlike. I could see that turning off a lot of Christians.
    Reply
  • Avro Arrow
    They call them "Flagship" motherboards.

    I call them "Irrelevant motherboards that people do not buy." :LOL:

    Seriously though, these really are irrelevant to most people because no matter who is king at this level, things can be very different at the price points that most people are willing to pay.

    Like, if I were in the market for an X670E board, I'd be looking at the ASRock X670E PG Lightning. ASRock isn't even represented here, probably because they don't think that there is a need for anything more expensive than a Taichi.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Can you guys focus on B650 boards as well? All you seem to review is stuff that lands the manufacturers juicy dough.
    Reply
  • ohio_buckeye
    Not buying these. Overpriced.
    Reply
  • simonharris314
    Can I just ask how you managed to get an Intel Core i9-13900K running on an AM5 motherboard?
    Maybe the test system needs to be looked at?

    H
    Reply
  • jxdking
    Why testing with DDR5-6000 CL36, not CL30 stuff?
    Why testing with RTX 3070, not RTX 4090?
    Why MSI's uncore frequency is 1500MHz in CPU-Z, while other 2 boards running on 3000MHz?

    PS: They are on different AGESA as well. CPU boosts differently on differently AGESA.
    Reply
  • PlaneInTheSky
    Dude, if I'm going to buy a $1,000 mobo, it better come with a bar of gold attached to it.

    Who even buys this, rich kids from Saudi Arabia or something.
    Reply
  • jdalso
    When I look at the Asus manual for the reviewed motherboard, the only sharing is between the 2 PCIe slots which will run at x8,x8 when both are used. It has multiple m.2 v5 slots that run without sharing with the PCIe slots.
    Reply
  • MKBL
    Is this typo? Intel CPU on X670E?

    Test System ComponentsCPUIntel Core i9-13900KMemoryKingston Fury Beast DDR5-6000 CL36 (KF560C36BBEAK2-32) GSkill Trident Z DDR5-5600 CL36 (F5-5600U3636C16GX2-TZ5RK)
    Reply
  • waltc3
    Nice write up! One thing I would have enjoyed seeing pictured is the back of the motherboards. I've never understood why some reviews don't bother with shots of the back of the reviewed boards. My x570 Master comes standard with a backplate on the back of the board, which not only lends it weight, but most importantly keeps the board from any sort of warp so that the dimensions are always the same (fits the stand-offs perfectly, etc.) Sometimes a pic of the board back can offer some insight into board construction.

    All of these mboards disappoint. I'm not going to go Intel, so I'll only compare and look for AMD mboards. MSI/Asus--far too expensive. Just ridiculous, frankly. You're right, the best board buy seems to be the Asroc you've mentioned. The GB board features almost the identical sound hardware that is featured on my x570 Master! They couldn't have improved it? Sad. $360 for my x570 was a great buy, considering the features it offers. The x670e Aorus Master costs $140 more than my x570 Master, but lacks several of the must-have features that made the Master so popular are not present in the x670e Master--including, incredibly, no backplate Clear CMOS button! And last, these are all E-ATX, which is going to require a new case purchase, on top of the rest of it. The 5800X3D is looking better all the time.
    Reply