AMD Launches HD 7700M, 7800M, and 7900M Mobile GPUs

22

Starting in late 2011, AMD has released three different series of discrete graphics cards based on its new 28 nm GCN Architecture: Radeon HD 7900 series, HD 7800 series and HD 7700 series. Now AMD has taken the new 28 nm GCN Architecture to its mobile platform with its Radeon HD 7900M "Wimbledon", HD 7800M "Heathrow" and HD 7700M "Chelsea" release.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • eddieroolz
    The naming falsification (7870 -> 7970M) continues.
    Reply
  • willard
    Hey, at least these are actually 7000 series cards for a change. I fully expected these to be rebadged 6000 series cards.
    Reply
  • joedjnpc
    Where is the naming falsification? There's clearly an "M" there to differentiate the products. The 79** series represents the highest end model, why do AMD need to keep the naming and performance consistant in the move from desktop to laptop? Anyone with half a brain knows you can't get the same performance in a lappy.
    Reply
  • matt_b
    eddieroolzThe naming falsification (7870 -> 7970M) continues.As confusing and as much fuss that I can put up over the eternal naming game, I do understand it. The 7970 is supposed to be the top performer (single core GPU card) for the 7000 series for desktops, so keeping the naming scheme, the 7970m is the top performer for the mobile/laptop 7000 series - all with disregard to performance. I understand the reason, but I would just rather it be HD7970 = the 7970m in performance, with the obvious tweaks for power consumption and heat output that a mobile unit must have. Gaming/apps on a laptop would be so much easier with respect to looking up system requirements and knowing that hardware naming is on the same playing field.
    Reply
  • noobzilla771
    OMG I just bought an Alienware m17x R3 last week too :( The R4s with 7970m is out with base price of $1899.
    I got a refurb 6990m for $1200 after taxes. Hopefully I got it for that price because it's old GPU. If refurb 7970m shows up for the same price I will shoot myself :(
    Reply
  • SteelCity1981
    The thing i hate is the rebandage gpus. I mean if you want to talk about truly the falsification that's falsification and i'm surprised their hasn't been a class action lawsuit in regards to rebrandaging the same gpu's by fooling consumors into thinking it's a newer gen gpu when it actually isn't.
    Reply
  • matt_b
    SteelCity1981The thing i hate is the rebandage gpus. I mean if you want to talk about truly the falsification that's falsification and i'm surprised their hasn't been a class action lawsuit in regards to rebrandaging the same gpu's by fooling consumors into thinking it's a newer gen gpu when it actually isn't.Anyone in the know feels the same way about the re-badging as you do here. Lucky for consumers, all of these cards mentioned in the article are the new architecture. It may be too early to make a call, but so far Nvidia seems to be taking a solid first-placed lead for re-badging this generation of GPU's - shame on both of them though.
    Reply
  • madooo12
    matt_bAs confusing and as much fuss that I can put up over the eternal naming game, I do understand it. The 7970 is supposed to be the top performer (single core GPU card) for the 7000 series for desktops, so keeping the naming scheme, the 7970m is the top performer for the mobile/laptop 7000 series - all with disregard to performance. I understand the reason, but I would just rather it be HD7970 = the 7970m in performance, with the obvious tweaks for power consumption and heat output that a mobile unit must have. Gaming/apps on a laptop would be so much easier with respect to looking up system requirements and knowing that hardware naming is on the same playing field.so if there is potential for power improvements, why not apply them for desktops?
    the mobile part MUST perform less to consume less power

    BTW nice to see AMD focusing more on mobile stuff
    Reply
  • xtreme5
    gooood!!!
    Reply
  • A Bad Day
    Let's see if AMD rebadges the lower end 7000's GPUs...
    Reply