Bringing It All Together: The Tahiti GPU And Radeon HD 7970
The Tahiti GPU in AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 plays host to 32 CUs. With 64 ALUs per CU, that adds up to a total of 2048 total ALUs. Do the multiplication, assuming a 925 MHz core clock and you have a GPU capable of about 3.8 TFLOPS of 32-bit math and 947 double-precision GFLOPS. The L1 cache offers about 2 TB/s of bandwidth at this card’s clock rate, backed by a larger 768 KB L2 cache.
There are eight render back-ends capable of 32 full-color raster operations per clock, the same as Radeon HD 6970. But while the raw specifications are identical, efficiency is improved by virtue of six 64-bit memory controllers yielding a wider 384-bit memory interface. Between the expanded bus and faster 1375 MHz GDDR5 memory, the Radeon HD 7970 boasts an impressive 264 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is roughly 100 GB/s more than the Radeon HD 6970.
Revamped Tessellation Engines
Each GPU has two revamped geometry engines optimized for tessellation. Though they’re still limited to 2 billion vertices, AMD claims a 1.7x to 4x performance increase, depending on the number of subdivisions applied to the source primitive. The large parameter buffer cache has also been increased.
PowerTune and ZeroCore
PowerTune should be familiar from our Radeon HD 6900-series launch coverage. To recap, the feature monitors work performed by the GPU and adjusts frequencies so that the board only uses the power that its maximum TDP allows. According to AMD, without PowerTune, the Radeon HD 7970’s core would have to be cut to about 720 MHz in order to fit within the 250 W envelope, taking worst-case scenarios into account.
The Tahiti GPU does have new power management functionality up its silicon-encrusted sleeve though, and it’s called ZeroCore technology. Comprised of several developments, including a deep sleep mode to reduce GPU consumption, a DRAM stutter mode to reduce memory power, and the ability to compress the frame buffer’s contents, ZeroCore has a measurable effect on draw during idle and monitor-off situations. AMD claims that the card only consumes 15 W in a static Windows environment, and its GPU is completely turned off when the monitor is not in use. The fan even stops, and minimal heat is dissipated. Our power readings confirm that the Radeon HD 7970 uses notably less power than the Radeon HD 6970 at idle.
CrossFire users—the folks who often have to contend with the biggest thermal issues—will welcome another component of ZeroCore that turns off the second, third, or fourth board in a multi-GPU environment when they’re not needed. With supply of available Radeon HD 7970s painfully low and only a single sample available to test, we cannot yet confirm that this feature works as AMD is advertising. However, it’s on our list of things to double-check when the company’s supply stabilizes.
PCI Express 3.0
Data is fed into and from the GPU through PCI Express, of course, and AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 is the first graphics card to boast compatibility with the third-gen standard. Frankly, today’s desktop software cannot seem to saturate PCI Express 2.0 slots, even when they’re halved into eight-lane links. So, we doubt we’ll see any performance increase from the interface currently only supported by Intel’s Core i7-3000-series processors. However, AMD hints that the 16 GB/s of bidirectional bandwidth may help compute applications in some cases. Again, though, vendors aren’t even ready to show off the applications they demonstrated at the Radeon HD 7970 briefing, and we weren’t given enough time to test the effects of third-gen PCI Express ahead of today’s embargo anyway.
Meet Radeon HD 7970
At 10.5” long by 4.5” tall, the Radeon HD 7970’s PCB is exactly the same size as the 6970. It appears smaller, though, thanks to a design trick used by automakers and Apple: the heat sink is tapered at the end.
Despite the dimensional similarity, there are some notable differences between AMD’s successive single-GPU flagships. The back of the new card isn’t covered by a metal reinforcement plate, for starters. Moreover, its axial fan intake is just under three inches, while the Radeon HD 6970’s is about two and a half.
Speaking of that fan, it has larger, wider blades designed for better airflow at lower rotational speeds. Despite the seeming improvement, our experience with fan noise was not a positive one. Check our noise benchmarks for more. AMD uses a newer version of the phase-changing thermal interface material (essentially a type of thermal paste) used in the Radeon HD 6990 to mate the cooler to the GPU. The two-step, three-level vapor chamber purportedly has an easier job pushing air out of the back of the card because AMD removed the stacked DVI connector for better airflow.
So, with the second DVI connector removed, what’s left? The reference card comes with two mini-DisplayPort outputs, an HDMI output, and one dual-link DVI output. Before you get too torn up about a triple-monitor Eyefinity setup requiring an expensive investment in DVI adapters, there’s some good news: AMD says it's going to bundle an HDMI-to-DVI adapter and active mini-DisplayPort-to-DVI adapter with its cards. So, despite the loss of one previously-valuable connector, triple-monitor users should be better-supported now than they were with the Radeon HD 6970. Of course, that's not to say the company's add-in board partners will be as generous. Do your homework before picking a brand and make sure those extras come bundled before jumping on the lowest price.
With the cooler removed, you can see the large plate protecting the GPU, designed to resist the warping seen in previous-generation products. Here are some shots of the naked card and exposed GPU, posing in unabashed glory.
Note the six- and eight-pin power connectors, similar to the Radeon HD 6970. These should come as no surprise considering the similar TDP of both cards, although AMD claims the power delivery is overkill for everyone except overclockers. Also pay attention to the dual BIOS switch, which is another welcome carry-over from the 6900 series that facilitates firmware tweaking with a little less risk.
I'll be trolling Newegg for the next couple weeks on the off-chance they pop up before the 9th. A couple in CrossFire could be pretty phenomenal, but it remains to be seen if they maintain the 6900-series scalability.
Hate to break it to you, but there won't be, unless you celebrate Christmas in mid-January.
Start treating your SO super-nice and ask for one for Valentine's Day!
If I ever find someone that will buy me a $500 graphics card for Valentine's Day I'll be proposing on the spot.
While I have little doubt that 2x of these cards would be very impressive, so would the $1100+ pricetag. I guess coming from the 580 SLI standpoint it might not seem like much, but if you've been considering the $750 ($900 for mobo+psu difference) 3x 6950 route like myself it seems like a major jump.
Of course this is all just initial reaction towards the earliest of benchmarks. Given awhile to really dig around the new 7xxx, while allowing it to mature from a driver standpoint might make the 3x6950 seem foolhardy.