Trending

This Award-Winning 1TB SSD Is Only $83

By

A hefty price cut

(Image credit: SK Hynix)

SATA isn't what most of the best SSDs use anymore, but SATA SSDs will still bring you a strong upgrade over traditional hard drives, especially if you want a lot of fast storage on the cheap. In our SK Hynix Gold S31 review earlier this year, we gave the SSD our Editor's Choice Award. Today, you can get the 1TB drive for $83.19 , down from $159.99, though it was $105.99 when we reviewed it.

The Gold S31 has key features like LPDDR3 DRAM and offers a lot of performance for the price. It's a 2.5-inch drive that connects over SATA III and comes in sizes ranging from 250GB to 1TB (the 500GB version is also on sale right now for $48.79, down from $60.99). The 1TB version we're suggesting here has an LPDDR3 DRAM cache and scored sequential read / write speeds of 560 MBps / 525 MBps in our testing.

1TB SK Hynix Gold S31: was $159.99, now $83.19 at Amazon
The SK Hynix Gold S31 SSD is a SATA drive with an LPDDR3 DRAM cache. It touts sequential read/write speeds of 560 MBps and 525 MBps, respectively. View Deal

The  Hynix Gold S31 also comes with free cloning and migration software, which our review praised as key pros alongside its performance and long five-year warranty. With a new generation of games around the corner, it’s not a bad idea to stock up on some extra storage space while it’s cheap. 

Topics
Deal
17 Comments Comment from the forums
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    The only downside is it isn't 2TB for $160. With games using higher resolution and more complex assets, with Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 being a prime example of 200GB of space required, but with 40GB+ being increasingly common, and especially with the RTX 3070, and presumably AMD's version as well, making 4k60 accessible at the mainstream level, there is an ever increasing market for 2TB and higher SATA SSDs...
    Reply
  • Giroro
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    The only downside is it isn't 2TB for $160. With games using higher resolution and more complex assets, with Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 being a prime example of 200GB of space required, but with 40GB+ being increasingly common, and especially with the RTX 3070, and presumably AMD's version as well, making 4k60 accessible at the mainstream level, there is an ever increasing market for 2TB and higher SATA SSDs...
    You can always do a RAID 0 array of 1TB drives, which will also perform better than an interface-limited 2TB drive.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Giroro said:
    You can always do a RAID 0 array of 1TB drives, which will also perform better than an interface-limited 2TB drive.
    RAID 0 + SSD is rarely a good idea. There are only a very few use cases where it might make a difference. A gaming PC is not one of them.
    Reply
  • styymy
    Admin said:
    We gave this SK Hynix 1TB SSD high marks in our review this year, and now it's on sale.

    This Award-Winning 1TB SSD Is Only $83 : Read more
    Already back up to $99. Only took a few hours.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    USAFRet said:
    RAID 0 + SSD is rarely a good idea. There are only a very few use cases where it might make a difference. A gaming PC is not one of them.
    Raid 0 on a gaming PC doesn't sound that bad.

    There's no point backing up Steam since you can always re-download it.

    The increase in speed over a single SSD may not be that noticeable for gaming but having an array twice as large as before lets you fit twice as many games.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    derekullo said:
    Raid 0 on a gaming PC doesn't sound that bad.

    There's no point backing up Steam since you can always re-download it.

    The increase in speed over a single SSD may not be that noticeable for gaming but having an array twice as large as before lets you fit twice as many games.
    1TB + 1TB + RAID 0 = 2TB
    1TB + 1TB = 2TB

    Steam trivially allows libraries on multiple drives or partitions.
    No need for the complexity and fragility of the RAID 0.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    USAFRet said:
    1TB + 1TB + RAID 0 = 2TB
    1TB + 1TB = 2TB

    Steam trivially allows libraries on multiple drives or partitions.
    No need for the complexity and fragility of the RAID 0.

    Complexity of Raid 0To me only having 1 partition with all of my games is easier to manage and less complex than deciding if I should install my game on D: with 600 gigabytes free or E: with 500 gigabytes free.

    Fragility of Raid 0If you only have 1 drive and it fails you lose everything.

    If you have a raid 0 and 1 drive fails you also lose everything.

    The chance of a drive dying with 2 drives is indeed higher than a single drive, but the "everything" in this case is easily replaceable data you can re-download from Steam.

    My sample size may not be as large as Backblaze, but with the 600 or so computers with SSDs that we have purchased in the last 3 years I have yet to see an SSD fail versus the 1-2 a month hard drives that fail.

    In conclusion, the increased quality of life due to the reduction of complexity outweighs the negligible increase in fragility of the easily replaceable data.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    You can promote the RAID 0 all you want.
    For this purpose, I'll not agree. Especially without dedicated RAID hardware controller.


    Steam games locationIn the steam client:
    Steam
    Settings
    Downloads
    Steam Library Folders
    Add library folder

    To move an already installed gameGames library
    Right click the game
    Properties
    Local Files
    Move Install Folder
    Reply
  • derekullo
    USAFRet said:
    You can promote the RAID 0 all you want.
    For this purpose, I'll not agree. Especially without dedicated RAID hardware controller.


    Steam games locationIn the steam client:
    Steam
    Settings
    Downloads
    Steam Library Folders
    Add library folder

    To move an already installed gameGames library
    Right click the game
    Properties
    Local Files
    Move Install Folder
    A dedicated raid controller for a gaming computer sounds like overkill if all you are doing is storing games.

    I can't think of another scenario when I would use raid 0 other than this one here.

    If not this one than for what purpose would you use a raid 0 ?

    Edit: I'm sorry if this brings up a scarring raid 0 failure from the past.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    derekullo said:
    A dedicated raid controller for a gaming computer sounds like overkill if all you are doing is storing games.

    I can't think of another scenario when I would use raid 0 other than this one here.

    If not this one than for what purpose would you use a raid 0 ?
    I have a 3x 8TB RAID 0 in my QNAP NAS box.
    Dedicated RAID controller, solid software.
    Simply to present a single 24TB volume. And also, mostly as an experiment. Just to play with it.

    This is fully backed up and easily recoverable at all times, to other storage.

    For a game box, with Steam easily configurable for multiple drives? Not a chance.

    For your "easily downloadable again" ? Not everyone has great bandwidth.
    Reply