Future Seagate SSDs Will Use ''Memory Modem''

20

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • jacobdrj
    Seagate is not my favorite company, but I don't despise them either. Them investing in their own approach to SSD development is excellent for the market, just like Samsung going their own way, with Marvell, Intel, Sandforce and OCZ/Indilinx...

    Kind of sad it took them this long to get their feet wet...
    Reply
  • waethorn
    Huh?

    Memory "Modem"?

    Since when does modulating analog audio waves apply to storage?
    Reply
  • drwho1
    512GB SSD's for $100 coming up!
    Will sell like Hotcakes. Syrup extra.
    /sarcasm
    Reply
  • djscribbles
    More about the technology:
    http://www.densbits.com/Data/Upl/UFCK/DensBitsTechnologyOverview.pdf

    Memory Modem is a really strange name, it doesn't exactly make me think "cutting-edge", but it seems like their claimed results are quite good. Enabling TLC cells will reduce cost quite a bit by itself.
    Reply
  • warezme
    they bought Samsung? Dang, there goes another brand I won't buy now.
    Reply
  • alidan
    jacobdrjSeagate is not my favorite company, but I don't despise them either. Them investing in their own approach to SSD development is excellent for the market, just like Samsung going their own way, with Marvell, Intel, Sandforce and OCZ/Indilinx... Kind of sad it took them this long to get their feet wet...
    i dont like seagate drives, after after having 4 fail and being on my 5th and 6th replacement drives, i have only 1 thing to say, their warranties kick ass, at least the one im on. as for the drives, a secondary backup is a must.

    as for the drives... i dont need them to be more than 100mb read and write, so long as io operations are still high and the seek time is insanely low, 1ms or less, i would buy them. i have a use for a low speed storage if the seek time is fast.
    Reply
  • goodguy713

    with that kind of reliability track record i would would never buy a seagate drive .. western digital is my all time favorite next to hitachi .. had both drives well over 3 years and neither of them have had any issues just saying .. samsung was one of the best drives you could get..
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    goodguy713with that kind of reliability track record i would would never buy a seagate drive .. western digital is my all time favorite next to hitachi .. had both drives well over 3 years and neither of them have had any issues just saying .. samsung was one of the best drives you could get..
    I just got rid of two Seagate 120GB Barracudas that were 8 years old and still good per every diag I could run on them.

    Have two 5 year old 500GB Seagates in my home machine with no issues at all.

    I don't think Seagate is as bad as everyone makes them out to be, there are still worse.
    Reply
  • ProDigit10
    good to get prices down on netbooks and tablets!
    Good enough for netbooks, their cpu can only handle so much anyway!
    Reply
  • megiv
    fatality1515"Based in Israel..." Good to know! I will boycott this drive.. Israel receives from the US $3.09 billion a year (or an average of $8.5 million a day) in aid.. Israel is not poor, and doesn't need this money.. Yet the Jewish lobby makes a wonderful job milking billions out of Americans each year, for many decades.. Greedy scumbags! They will not get a penny out of me...Earth to fatality1515 - The US gives 3.09 billion $ "Voucher". Israel must spend this money to purchase from US factories. Do you really think that its all about some lobby? that kind of anti semi mixed with ignorance.

    I got a better idea - lets talk about the addiction to fossil fuel and the Arab lobby, shall we?
    Reply