Microsoft's Windows 95 release was 30 years ago today, the first time software was a pop culture smash
Going big on gaming and internet support were good bets.
Microsoft’s momentous Windows 95 operating system became available to the public on this day 30 years ago. Computing enthusiasts were queuing around the block at midnight launch events. Perhaps this was the first time an OS launch became a cultural event – one that was carefully primed by the launch a month earlier, and the Start Me Up advertising campaign.
PC users had access to Windows operating systems, and similar WIMP OSes, before Windows 95. However, Windows 95 was billed as a merger of Microsoft’s DOS and Windows products into a unified whole. Moreover, it brought in a significantly revamped UI, including the Start Button and many other elements we still live with today.
Other welcome features that first became mainstream on PCs thanks to the introduction of Windows 95 include; the 32-bit preemptive multitasking architecture with task bar, plug and play hardware, support for long filenames, and many more.
System requirements
To boost Windows 3.1 migrations, Windows 95’s official requirements presented quite a low bar. Users should have an Intel 386DX processor, 4MB of RAM, a VGA or better display, and make sure to have 55MB of HDD space clear for the installation process.
Recommended settings, for those hoping to make proper use of the new multitasking capabilities, and internet features like MSN and Exchange were higher. For improved usability, Windows 95 would benefit from a 486 or better CPU, 8MB of RAM, an SVGA display, as well as more storage.
It is debatable whether this was the beginning of bloat. For some context, the contemporary Macintosh System 7.5.X required about half the fixed storage of Windows 95.
You can test Windows 95 RTM in an online VM, on PCjs Machines, using the link.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Windows 95 launch price and success
Windows 95 originally retailed in a box with between 13 and 15 1.44MB floppy disks. You could purchase a full installation version or an upgrade for Windows 3.1 systems. A CD distribution came with a boot floppy, as you would need DOS-level CD-ROM drivers to load before install.
PC enthusiasts at the time would have had to buy a new system with Windows 95 pre-installed or cough up $209, which adjusted for inflation brings us perilously close to $400 in 2025. Just for an OS...
Despite the entry price, Microsoft’s lavish advertising budget and promotional activities paid off. Sales revenue from the release reportedly hit $720 million on day one. Also, a million copies of the OS had been shipped by day four.
In 1996, Microsoft celebrated the one-year anniversary of Windows 95’s release with the claim that it had shipped 40 million units worldwide. By then, the software company could boast of 400 PC manufacturing partners, and that 4,406 software applications were supported.
Gaming and the web
Paving the way for the success to come, it was also noted that 10 of the 11 publishers of the top 20 PC game titles were onboard with Windows 95-based gaming. Moreover, the use of the web was accelerating, with Netscape and Microsoft both releasing their new browsers on 32-bit Windows.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
Findecanor Back then, there were quite a few in the tech press who were in effect compromised, fooled by Microsoft marketing. Some sheep still are.Reply
I too installed Windows 95 back in the day, right after I had got my first "PC". (but I didn't pay for it)
And when I partitioned my hard drive, I also created an equally large partition for Linux. -
Alvar "Miles" Udell ReplyIt is debatable whether this was the beginning of bloat.
The answer is "No" because Windows 95 has minimal, typical, and custom installation options, and there's very little that would count as "bloat" except for the later added Active Desktop, because nothing really ran in the background that was unnecessary that you didn't add.
I would say Windows XP was the beginning of bloat (I don't count Windows Mistake Edition, it was trash and should be forgotten) because the enterprise focused Windows 2000 (which I still say is the better OS) striped out all the media features and such, was far more lean, and more stable.
Though it would depend on what you call "bloat". For most tech publications and many people "bloat" is classified as "Anything that exists that I don't like even if it doesn't run at all". For me it's "Anything that exists AND uses meaningful system resources AND can cause issues AND doesn't impact anything else if removed". For some people I think the entire existence of a UI is "bloat" to them. -
ggeeoorrggee I assumed this article would be mentioning the Weezer “Buddy Holly” video packaged on the Windows 95 CD.Reply -
ezst036 I still have fond memories of Windows 95. I miss that Microsoft, the one who was much more outwardly interested in having the users' interest best interest at heart.Reply
Windows 95 had zero factory spyware in it. FWIW. That I am aware of. -
TechieTwo Windows was definitely the downfall of PC security and it's just gotten worse with every iteration. Pretty sad IMNHO.Reply -
Dr3ams The first PC I built was in 1995.Reply
It included:
- Windows 95
- Intel Pentium 133
- 16 MB RAM
- 1.2 GB hard drive
- ATI Mach64 4 MB GPU
- Sound Blaster 32 PnP sound card
- 6 speed CD ROM
- no name 17" CRT monitor
I also bought a HP DeskJet 660C printer which came with the games Myst and Microsoft Arcade. I can't remember the manufacturer or specs of the mainboard, PSU and case. -
ejolson As a student I moved from Windows 3.11 to Linux. Linux was free but I soon upgraded the RAM in that 486 computer from 8MB to 20MB to run X Windows. Although the RAM was significantly more than the cost of Windows 95, money not spent on software can be spent on hardware.Reply -
NightLight I'm not interested in people saying they opted for linux, good on you, your must be so proud. This is not about that. Win95 was a big step up from win 3x and is at the base of what we have now. You can hate on msft all you want, but everybody knows about it. They did good, and it needs to be said. A bit of respect can be shown without having to beat up on legendary software.Reply