First Look: AMD's Carrizo APU Notebook Design

While Carrizo-equipped systems won't be available until the mid-year time frame, the company has working silicon in hand. AMD has thin and light prototype systems jointly developed with Shuttle Inc. and is showing them off at CES. According to Kevin Lensing, Senior Director, Product Management, AMD, "It's a 'Carrizo'-based system sporting an upcoming mobile discrete GPU and it delivers exceptional, unprecedented gaming performance in a thinner and lighter platform than previously possible due to the energy efficiency and performance focus we have in 'Carrizo.'" The CES demonstrations are limited to private appointments and aren't available to the general public, but Tom's Hardware will be there and we look forward to seeing what Carrizo can do.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Don Woligroski was a former senior hardware editor for Tom's Hardware. He has covered a wide range of PC hardware topics, including CPUs, GPUs, system building, and emerging technologies.

  • shogunofharlom
    As a longtime AMD user, I'm telling you... don't get your hopes up. AMD cant make decent cpu's or drivers, but their PR department is top notch. Expect the usual %10 performance increase with a %5 battery life gain. They will use the designs marginally increased efficiency to increase clock speeds, but not so much to negate a net a battery-life gain.
    Reply
  • Fearnot
    Better be a FM2+ Carrizo also or AMD has completely abandoned the desktop till 2016. Also don't bother bringing up the rebadged 2012 8350's that they are still trying to sell like new.
    Reply
  • AJSB
    I don't give a <<blank>> about Notebooks, i had two and swear to never again, i only use/build mini-ITX for several years.

    Better AMD have that Carrizo thing in a dropin FM2+ socket or else i will be VERY disapointed.

    Still using Trinity APUs in FM2+ MoBos and WON'T upgrade untill Carrizo arrives to Desktop.
    Reply
  • Rookie_MIB
    I certainly am rooting for AMD to get their *#&@ together and get this power usage under control. In situations where power is not an issue, I certainly like AMD's performance/$ ratio as I can easily put together a competent desktop or basic server for a very reasonable price. When it comes down to performance/watt (laptops and htpc) however, I have to go Intel.

    J1900 HTPC (10w)
    i5 Sandy bridge laptop (zenbook)
    AMD Opteron rack server (1u webserver)
    Xeon X3450 rack server (big hotswap VM server and couldn't beat the price)
    AMD Phenom II x 2 (freenas media server)
    AMD A10-5700 desktop (working computer)
    Reply
  • anxiousinfusion
    I don't give a <<blank>> about Notebooks, i had two and swear to never again, i only use/build mini-ITX for several years.

    Better AMD have that Carrizo thing in a dropin FM2+ socket or else i will be VERY disapointed.

    Still using Trinity APUs in FM2+ MoBos and WON'T upgrade untill Carrizo arrives to Desktop.

    Agreed. It's saddening to see AMD basically tell desktop users to go die in a hole. Laptops are the epitome of compromise.
    Reply
  • thd101kf
    At least for consumers who spend most on their time on entertainment this amd apu will be better than intel who focus too much on pure cpu workloads despite the improvement they have made in igp.
    Reply
  • Vlad Razvan
    As a longtime AMD user, I'm telling you... don't get your hopes up. AMD cant make decent cpu's or drivers, but their PR department is top notch. Expect the usual %10 performance increase with a %5 battery life gain. They will use the designs marginally increased efficiency to increase clock speeds, but not so much to negate a net a battery-life gain.

    I don't agree with you on the drivers part. While it used to be true in the past, I consider current AMD drivers to be on par with nVidia's. I currently own an Asus ROG 751JY with an nvidia card, and I have to say - nvida drivers are dissapointing. Issues like BSODs and overheating, or setting the GPU to 100% at idle and on battery power are quite common in today's nvidia drivers. Also, nvidia control pannel doesn't have as many features as Catalyst control center. (I used to have a 7970m in my Precision M6700 before I sold it and got my current machine). I can't belive I'm saying this, but I miss catalyst control center... It even enabled OC by default - I can't seem to OC the 980m regardless of what I try...
    Reply
  • TechyInAZ
    Interesting, any chance well be seeing this type of APU in the desktop market?
    Reply
  • zodiacfml
    this is going to be the same story all over again versus the Intel's Broadwell, auperior graphics with weaker CPU with higher consumption.
    Reply
  • Dan Ritchie
    Kaveri was starting to get pretty good. Performance of C++ Amp code was impressive. Looking forward to seeing what HSA adds.
    Reply