AMD Nixes PCIe 4.0 Support on Older Socket AM4 Motherboards, Here's Why

(Image credit: AMD)
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Dark Lord of Tech
    Thanks for the great info!
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    Not surprising. There is more than just traces to PCIe. Typically new standards can change those traces, how wide or thick they are or the distances they can travel to qualify for their rated speeds.

    The only downside is that AMD should have said something much sooner as a lot of people hyped that as a massive feature.

    However considering that PCIe 2.0 is still barely saturated for what this would have given people, it would have only given them the x16 slot and MAYBE the M.2 slot as 4.0, its not a major deal as 3.0 still has plenty of headroom for GPUs.
    Reply
  • current graphics cards are not going to benefit from pcie4 much--if at all. where you get the kick in the pants is with the new NVMe pcie 4.0 drives coming out. so it's still worth it to get a new mobo. glad I waited to build.
    Reply
  • rajag89
    taking a bit of the shine of AMD's vaunted backward compatibility with Ryzen processors on the AM4 socke
    Why do we expect a mb designed for PCIE3 to support PCIE4 ? The processor runs as promised with backward compatibility. The article tries to show AMD in bad lights because it can't allow PCIE3 ports of older generation to run on PCIE4 magically. Yay, as per the writer AMD broke the promise because the PCIE3 ports can't work as 4.
    Reply
  • exactly. i never bought the hype that pcie4 would be available on old motherboards. not possible, and if it is, it's gimped and full of bugs. not stable, not good, not usable. get a new motherboard
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    when reading about AM4 supporting the newer gen chips at no point did i even consider that pcie 4 would work on pcie3 slots, nor that usb 2/3 ports would all of a sudden become thunderbolt ports, that the DDR4 slots would support DDR 5, that the SATA 6 ports would all of a sudden become SATA 12 or anything else magically changing to include features that are not the cpu itself.

    not really sure why the author believes this was ever a promise AMD made. they promised the new cpu's would work on AM4 boards and for the most part it does. few of the super budget boards from 2 generations ago can't support it due to BIOS limitations, but overall, they have delivered a lot more than Intel ever has for a socket lasting longer than a year.

    if you want bleeding edge, be prepared to pay for it like always. ok with last year's fashions? then enjoy the cost savings the older chipsets will bring you. :)
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    Math Geek said:
    when reading about AM4 supporting the newer gen chips at no point did i even consider that pcie 4 would work on pcie3 slots, nor that usb 2/3 ports would all of a sudden become thunderbolt ports, that the DDR4 slots would support DDR 5, that the SATA 6 ports would all of a sudden become SATA 12 or anything else magically changing to include features that are not the cpu itself.

    not really sure why the author believes this was ever a promise AMD made. they promised the new cpu's would work on AM4 boards and for the most part it does. few of the super budget boards from 2 generations ago can't support it due to BIOS limitations, but overall, they have delivered a lot more than Intel ever has for a socket lasting longer than a year.

    if you want bleeding edge, be prepared to pay for it like always. ok with last year's fashions? then enjoy the cost savings the older chipsets will bring you. :)


    AMD confirmed directly to us that it would support that feature on older boards. That's why the author feels that way :)
    Reply
  • rajag89
    PaulAlcorn Well, even then it isn't a part of backward compatibility. They hoped to deliver something extra which eventually didn't workout. But calling this as a failure to deliver backward compatibility is a bit too much from writer. Just MO.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    really? i saw where they said it could work on some boards but did not see where they promised that.

    that would of course change things a bit. if they made a promise before testing it fully and now have to take it back, then i can see where the comments are justified. can you link that release so i can work on my appropriate level of disgust :)
    Reply
  • King_V
    I personally always saw it as a bonus rather than anything. I don't recall, for example, in the days of Socket 7, any new features that didn't exist on the board being promised.

    I can't imagine in general that customers would be disappointed. PCIe 4.0 was certainly never even thought of when people were buying, say, the B350 and B450 boards, etc. just that the socket would still be usable by new processors up to 2020.

    Maybe AMD was a little too hyped when they first said it, though. Still, I'd be shocked of people (outside of trolls, anyway) started screaming and bemoaning the inability to get PCIe 4.0 on older boards. I fully agree with the closing paragraph:
    Given the circumstances, AMD is making the right choice here. Complicated support matrices, unofficial (and thus un-warrantied) "support," lowered throughput, and possible data loss are all untenable side effects of giving users what they want -- PCIe 4.0 support on motherboards that weren't designed for the task.
    Reply