AMD Ryzen 7 5700G: Zen 3 May Finally Be Coming To Desktop APUs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (Image credit: Weixin)

IVA Computer Hardware Group (via Twitter user HXL) is reportedly selling an engineering sample of AMD's forthcoming Zen 3 (Cezanne) APUs on Weixin. The seller isn't absolutely certain of the exact model, but it could be the Ryzen 7 5700G or Ryzen 7 5750G.

A lot of excitement surrounded AMD's Ryzen 4000 (Renoir) pre-launch as the Zen 2 chips would usher in eight cores to the APU segment. However, the chipmaker broke many hearts when it decided to restrict the sales to OEMs. While you could still pick up a Ryzen 4000 chip on the black market, desktop Renoir pretty much ended up in disappointment. With Ryzen 5000 (Cezanne), AMD might take a different course because, well, it's Zen 3 in the conversation here.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Loadedaxe
    The need to get off Vega graphics for the apus, its getting rather old and outdated.
    Reply
  • deksman
    Loadedaxe said:
    The need to get off Vega graphics for the apus, its getting rather old and outdated.

    To be fair, AMD upgraded Vega for Zen 2 CPU's and it ended up being on par with Navi performance and efficiency-wise.
    However, I do agree that with RDNA 2, AMD is better off to switch over to that for the iGP... still, I think that because of its later introduction, I think they opted to stick with enhanced Vega instead for Zen 3.
    I think we will see RDNA 2 (or 3) based APU's starting with Zen 4.
    Reply
  • mattkiss
    deksman said:
    To be fair, AMD upgraded Vega for Zen 2 CPU's and it ended up being on par with Navi performance and efficiency-wise.

    What do you mean by this?
    Reply
  • Giroro
    AMD already has an 8 core Zen 3 APU with navi graphics. Multiple variants actually in the PS5 and Xbox XS.
    It seems like it would be a waste of engineering resources to go back and redesign their new mid/high end APU with ultra-low-end Vega graphics.
    And it would be especially a bummer when it could easily be another year for mainstream priced current-gen GPUs to launch and actually become available.

    With availability and pricing the way it is, AMD has a real opportunity to totally dominate low to midrange gaming this year if they can get the graphics performance high enough to tide people over until an upgrade path to a new $150 - $300 GPU ... Exists.
    Plus the AMD executive who kept rebadging GCN cards for like 8 years got poached by Intel (weirdly not for their CPUs) so there is hope that AMD's GPU team might actually start making smart decisions again.
    Reply
  • mitch074
    Vega is not bad as an iGPU - it sucked when being clocked up, but considering that the main limit of an iGPU is shared RAM, sticking with it may be needed for price and performance. RDNA2 needs a big cache to work properly, which is OK when you have as much room on the die as you need. Here though, not so much.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Yep Vega is very good apu gpu!
    Anything better would make apus too expensive. Most people look for sub $100 apus and you have to cut even Vega down a lot to get the price there!
    Something as powerfull as PS5 would cost $1500 the cpu alone... nobody woul buy those...
    Reply
  • usiname
    hannibal said:
    Yep Vega is very good apu gpu!
    Anything better would make apus too expensive. Most people look for sub $100 apus and you have to cut even Vega down a lot to get the price there!
    Something as powerfull as PS5 would cost $1500 the cpu alone... nobody woul buy those...
    $1500? The whole xbox series x is $499 and PS5 399$. How only cpu can cost more than this, by more I mean 4x the price of PS5?
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Consoles Are sold at lost. Normal pc hardware They want to get Profit. Amd wants to have 50% Profit. Above that expensive to move, storage. Then middle hands want to get Profit. So the total price can be easily 3 to 4 times of the production costs...
    Ofcourse my estimation was pure ques, but I Expect that it can be even too Little...
    Reply
  • wtfmang
    yeah, $1500 Monopoly dollars
    Reply
  • mdd1963
    If it is coming with the same (rather pathetic) sub-GT1030-level performing graphics of the 4000-series APUs, I am not holding out much hope for folks fantasizing about doing any real gaming at 1080P without need for a discrete GPU...(perhaps in 3 more years an APU can equal a GTX1050's performance...(although a GTX1060 would be preferable!)

    (Might do OK for folks who do not really need a GPU, however....unless it is priced with more than a $100 of what a no-integrated-graphics equivalent CPU costs, I'd suspect only the misinformed would buy it)
    Reply