Which PC Boots Up and Shuts Down Faster: AMD or Intel?

Z490 vs X570
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The move to SSDs spurred a wave of UEFI and software optimizations that ultimately reduced boot times by significant amounts, but that doesn’t mean that every processor or platform can deliver the same level of performance during system boot up. There can be big differences between Intel and AMD’s respective chips and platforms (see our AMD vs Intel CPU face-off), so we set out to measure which company is the fastest at system boot up, shutdown, and restarting. 

Booting your PC can either go by in a few blinks of an eye or take up to minutes for those poor souls still booting off of an archaic HDD. These days we often take for granted how quickly our systems respond to our requests now that SSDs are prevalent. Through both UEFI optimizations as well as SSDs, we no longer have to dread long wait times that plagued our HDD experiences a decade ago. However, even one of the best SSDs can only do so much to speed up your user experience if the underlying hardware is the bottleneck.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • 563REt
    Admin said:
    We put Intel's Z490 platform head-to-head with AMD's X570 to see which system boots the fastest.

    Which PC Boots Up and Shuts Down Faster: AMD or Intel? : Read more
    The CPU does not make any difference, its the speed of your storage device. If your using a hardrive then your windows will boot up slower and be slower in general. Use an SSD or an M.2 NVme SSD for a faster Windows Experience.
    Reply
  • Aaron44126
    563REt said:
    The CPU does not make any difference, its the speed of your storage device. If your using a hardrive then your windows will boot up slower and be slower in general. Use an SSD or an M.2 NVme SSD for a faster Windows Experience.
    I get where you're coming from, but for the purposes of what was being measured in this article... They used the same storage device in all of the tests so clearly that is not the only factor.
    Reply
  • fevanson
    It looks like AGESA MOBO firmware from AMD's side takes a bit longer to initialize than Intel, otherwise I believe the actual boot up times will be almost 1:1.
    Reply
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    Slow news day?
    Reply
  • madmatt30
    Probably the most pointless test ever in all fairness.

    If you can't handle waiting 15 seconds to get into windows in a useable state there's something inherently wrong.

    My xbox one takes longer to boot than that!
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    Considering I'm used to over 1 minute boot times from older systems of yester year.

    These speeds are largely meaningless.

    And I rarely reboot, shut down, or cold boot.

    Most of the times my system is just on.
    Reply
  • cmoswizard
    This analysis ignores the many times that Microsoft decides to borrow your computer for updates both during boot up and shutdown. Average those in for an infrequent user and Windows loses hands down to Linux.
    AMD vs. Intel? Probably the same as stated here.
    Reply
  • jgraham11
    Wow, pretty crappy review. Another example of Tom's favouring Intel

    Why didn't you use an M.2 drive, they are 4-8 times faster than the SATA drive they chose. Notice the article never says SATA drive, I just searched it and the only reference is "Disabled the third-party SATA controller ".

    Could it have been because Intel doesn't support PCIE 4.0, which would have shown Intel being slower.

    Also, price wise, which is how all comparisons should be done: the 10600k would be price equivalent to the 3700X not the 3600X.
    Reply
  • NightHawkRMX
    They didn't use a SATA drive. They used an intel Optane PCIe SSD. Very fast though id assume PCIe 3 limited.

    I have built several AMD and intel machines and I can say, AMD usually does take a little longer to boot. But honestly it's not a metric that matters. 5-10 seconds more? Who cares.
    Reply
  • PCWarrior
    So Intel boots 50% faster than AMD in Windows and shuts down 72.7% faster in Linux. AMD fanboys feeling butthurt when seeing AMD losing badly, never fails to make me laugh.

    jgraham11 said:
    Wow, pretty crappy review. Another example of Tom's favouring Intel

    Why didn't you use an M.2 drive, they are 4-8 times faster than the SATA drive they chose. Notice the article never says SATA drive, I just searched it and the only reference is "Disabled the third-party SATA controller ".
    They didn’t use a SATA drive. They used the PCIE Intel Optane Drive here. That’s pretty much the fastest drive money can currently buy when it comes to latency and responsiveness.
    Reply