Engineer Details Messy LK-99 Superconductor Creation Process

Andrew McCalip (via Twitter @andrewmccalip)
(Image credit: Andrew McCalip (via Twitter @andrewmccalip))

If you're interested in making your own batch of the LK-99 superconducting material that's grabbed headlines around the world, you might be in for a shock at the complexity and nebulousness of the procedure. And as we'll detail below, you might also find difficulty sourcing some of the materials needed. 

If one person has stood among the eddies of the LK-99 superconductor drama as it happens in the US, that person is Andrew McCalip. The R&D engineer with California-based Varda Space Industries, McCalip has been at the forefront of public, independent replication efforts around the serendipitous superconductor, open-sourcing his work through Twitter and live-streaming the cooking process over Twitch - a relatively rare generosity. From his process, we can glean more information about the elusive LK-99 compound, its synthethization process, how difficult that process is in the face of restrictions around some of the required materials, and the somewhat "spotty" manufacturing process described in the original Korean paper. You can see his efforts in the two albums of images below.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • brandonjclark
    I feel like this is shaping up to be a major materials breakthrough.
    Reply
  • ingtar33
    nah, this is a type of ceramic, which means it's application as a real world superconductor is really limited, furthermore most of the physically observable effects can be the effect of dimagnitism not superconductivity.
    Reply
  • PlaneInTheSky
    No idea who this Andrew guy is, but it looks like he's just looking for attention on Twitter rather than producing anything useful.

    Anyway, I think this story is dead now.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    ingtar33 said:
    nah, this is a type of ceramic, which means it's application as a real world superconductor is really limited
    If it is really what they claim it is but cannot be formed in anything much larger than dust-sized flakes, it would still have uses in stuff like ferrite-like cores for electromagnets, transformers and motors. It could also be used in place of permanent magnets. If they can make it cheaper than Neodymium and it can handle magnetic field densities at least as strong, there will be plenty of possible uses.
    Reply
  • ingtar33
    InvalidError said:
    If it is really what they claim it is but cannot be formed in anything much larger than dust-sized flakes, it would still have uses in stuff like ferrite-like cores for electromagnets, transformers and motors. It could also be used in place of permanent magnets. If they can make it cheaper than Neodymium and it can handle magnetic field densities at least as strong, there will be plenty of possible uses.
    correct. there are uses, but the big uses they want for a room temp superconductor... such as replacing copper wire are basically impossible. still its an interesting type of ceramic. i just wish there was some real world confirmation. the videos such as this one all look like dimagnitism, furthermore several major labs have tried to reproduce this material with no luck. the only confirmation came from a computer simulation which seemed to imply this material had properties of a superconductor, but the lab which created the simulation hadn't made the material yet.
    Reply
  • purpleduggy
    the problem with reproducing the result is that they don't want to share the tech. the first usage and likely primary funding for research will be military and it is beneficial to their strategy if competing nations fail at reproducing it. Its like saying because no one but tsmc and samsung is capable of manifacturing at 2nm node, then 2nm node does not exist because other countries can only do 28nm. not at all. skill issue.
    Reply
  • PEnns
    "And as we'll detail below, you might also find difficulty sourcing some of the materials needed."

    Do you really expect people to run and start their own experiment at........Superconductor Fabrication??
    Reply
  • Friesiansam
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    No idea who this Andrew guy is, but it looks like he's just looking for attention on Twitter rather than producing anything useful.

    Anyway, I think this story is dead now.
    Yours', is the kind of attitude to scientific experimentation and discovery, that would see us still stuck in the Dark Ages.
    Reply
  • toffty
    Friesiansam said:
    Yours', is the kind of attitude to scientific experimentation and discovery, that would see us still stuck in the Dark Ages.
    And yours would bankrupt governments.

    From the outset LK99 appeared dubious and needed to be verified.
    The media way over hyped this and really needed to wait for verification to come in before saying this was the next amazing discovery

    Just because someone has an idea doesn't mean we should throw money at it.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    toffty said:
    The media way over hyped this and really needed to wait for verification to come in before saying this was the next amazing discovery
    Even if LK-99 is real, fact still is that it would be a crystalline material, which means its applications will be limited to whatever applications can make use of whatever shape and size crystals it can be made into.

    Being non-metallic likely crushes most hopes of using it for conventional superconductor purposes.
    Reply